腔内淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的新辅助化疗:特征、治疗和肿瘤预后:单一中心的经验。

European journal of breast health Pub Date : 2021-10-04 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-4-8
Erika Barbieri, Damiano Gentile, Alberto Bottini, Andrea Sagona, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Agnese Losurdo, Bethania Fernandes, Corrado Tinterri
{"title":"腔内淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的新辅助化疗:特征、治疗和肿瘤预后:单一中心的经验。","authors":"Erika Barbieri,&nbsp;Damiano Gentile,&nbsp;Alberto Bottini,&nbsp;Andrea Sagona,&nbsp;Wolfgang Gatzemeier,&nbsp;Agnese Losurdo,&nbsp;Bethania Fernandes,&nbsp;Corrado Tinterri","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). In luminal-like BC, the decision to administer NAC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes of luminal-like, node positive, BC patients treated with NAC, and to identify independent predictive factors for treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with luminal-like, node positive BC who underwent NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive or <i>in situ</i> residual tumor in both breast and axillary nodes (ypT0N0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 luminal-like, node positive BC patients underwent NAC. Overall, 34 (16.6%) patients showed pCR, 86 (42.0%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 119 (58.0%) patients underwent mastectomy, 130 (63.4%) patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 75 (36.6%) patients underwent breast surgery plus SLNB. Pathologic CR to NAC (29.1% vs 7.6% if no pCR, odds ratio = 2.866, 95% confidence interval = 1.296-6.341, p = 0.009) was found to significantly increase the probability to receive BCS. There was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival between patients with luminal-like, node positive BC receiving BCS or mastectomy (p = 0.596, p = 0.134, respectively), and ALND or SLNB only (p = 0.661, p = 0.856, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Luminal-like, node positive BC presents low pCR rates after NAC. Pre-operative chemotherapy increases the rate of BCS. Pathologic CR has emerged as an independent predictive factor for BCS. In patients with axillary pCR, SLNB is an acceptable procedure not associated with worse oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11885,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496120/pdf/ejbh-17-356.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal, Node Positive Breast Cancer: Characteristics, Treatment and Oncological Outcomes: A Single Center's Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Barbieri,&nbsp;Damiano Gentile,&nbsp;Alberto Bottini,&nbsp;Andrea Sagona,&nbsp;Wolfgang Gatzemeier,&nbsp;Agnese Losurdo,&nbsp;Bethania Fernandes,&nbsp;Corrado Tinterri\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-4-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). In luminal-like BC, the decision to administer NAC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes of luminal-like, node positive, BC patients treated with NAC, and to identify independent predictive factors for treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with luminal-like, node positive BC who underwent NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive or <i>in situ</i> residual tumor in both breast and axillary nodes (ypT0N0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 luminal-like, node positive BC patients underwent NAC. Overall, 34 (16.6%) patients showed pCR, 86 (42.0%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 119 (58.0%) patients underwent mastectomy, 130 (63.4%) patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 75 (36.6%) patients underwent breast surgery plus SLNB. Pathologic CR to NAC (29.1% vs 7.6% if no pCR, odds ratio = 2.866, 95% confidence interval = 1.296-6.341, p = 0.009) was found to significantly increase the probability to receive BCS. There was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival between patients with luminal-like, node positive BC receiving BCS or mastectomy (p = 0.596, p = 0.134, respectively), and ALND or SLNB only (p = 0.661, p = 0.856, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Luminal-like, node positive BC presents low pCR rates after NAC. Pre-operative chemotherapy increases the rate of BCS. Pathologic CR has emerged as an independent predictive factor for BCS. In patients with axillary pCR, SLNB is an acceptable procedure not associated with worse oncological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496120/pdf/ejbh-17-356.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-4-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新辅助化疗(NAC)是局部晚期乳腺癌(BC)患者的首选治疗方法。在类似于光的不列颠哥伦比亚省,管理NAC的决定仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是描述光样、淋巴结阳性、BC患者接受NAC治疗的临床特征、治疗和肿瘤预后,并确定治疗的独立预测因素。材料和方法:回顾性分析所有连续行NAC的光样淋巴结阳性BC患者。病理完全缓解(pCR)定义为乳腺和腋窝淋巴结无浸润性或原位残余肿瘤(ypT0N0)。结果:共有205例发光样淋巴结阳性BC患者行NAC。总体而言,34例(16.6%)患者行pCR, 86例(42.0%)患者行保乳手术(BCS), 119例(58.0%)患者行乳房切除术,130例(63.4%)患者行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND),未行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB), 75例(36.6%)患者行乳房手术加SLNB。病理CR对NAC(无pCR组为29.1% vs 7.6%,优势比为2.866,95%可信区间为1.296-6.341,p = 0.009)显著增加了接受BCS的概率。光样淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者接受BCS或乳房切除术(p = 0.596, p = 0.134)与仅行ALND或SLNB (p = 0.661, p = 0.856)的无病生存期和总生存期无显著差异。结论:NAC后发光样淋巴结阳性BC的pCR率较低。术前化疗可增加BCS的发生率。病理性CR已成为BCS的独立预测因素。在腋窝pCR患者中,SLNB是一种可接受的手术,与较差的肿瘤预后无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal, Node Positive Breast Cancer: Characteristics, Treatment and Oncological Outcomes: A Single Center's Experience.

Objective: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). In luminal-like BC, the decision to administer NAC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes of luminal-like, node positive, BC patients treated with NAC, and to identify independent predictive factors for treatment.

Materials and methods: All consecutive patients with luminal-like, node positive BC who underwent NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor in both breast and axillary nodes (ypT0N0).

Results: A total of 205 luminal-like, node positive BC patients underwent NAC. Overall, 34 (16.6%) patients showed pCR, 86 (42.0%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 119 (58.0%) patients underwent mastectomy, 130 (63.4%) patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 75 (36.6%) patients underwent breast surgery plus SLNB. Pathologic CR to NAC (29.1% vs 7.6% if no pCR, odds ratio = 2.866, 95% confidence interval = 1.296-6.341, p = 0.009) was found to significantly increase the probability to receive BCS. There was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival between patients with luminal-like, node positive BC receiving BCS or mastectomy (p = 0.596, p = 0.134, respectively), and ALND or SLNB only (p = 0.661, p = 0.856, respectively).

Conclusion: Luminal-like, node positive BC presents low pCR rates after NAC. Pre-operative chemotherapy increases the rate of BCS. Pathologic CR has emerged as an independent predictive factor for BCS. In patients with axillary pCR, SLNB is an acceptable procedure not associated with worse oncological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Concurrent Lupus Mastitis and Sarcoidosis in a 62-Year-Old Female High Levels of Superoxide Dismutase 2 Are Associated With Worse Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer The Effect of Informative Mobile App Use on Anxiety, Distress, and Quality of Life of Women With Breast Cancer Bioinformatic Investigation of Genetic Changes in Paraoxonase Genes in Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes Skin Staining After Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection: A Retrospective Study of Two Protocols for Injection and Long-Term Follow-Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1