澳洲脊医学生对教育的认知:问卷的验证。

Q3 Health Professions Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association Pub Date : 2021-08-01
Stanley I Innes, Norman Stomski, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Bruce F Walker
{"title":"澳洲脊医学生对教育的认知:问卷的验证。","authors":"Stanley I Innes,&nbsp;Norman Stomski,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde,&nbsp;Bruce F Walker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to validate a questionnaire to address an absence of a measure to evaluate Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of the quality of chiropractic programs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Potential relevant questionnaire items were selected from the Australian chiropractic accreditation standards. Chiropractic students rated these items for clarity and relevance, which resulted in a pilot questionnaire of 47 items. Principal components analysis was used to establish the structure of the scales. Finally, intra-class correlation coefficients were used to establish the scales' test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four items were omitted resulting in the retention of 13 items that strongly loaded onto five factors. Internal consistency was adequate. The test-retest reliability ranged from adequate to good for four of the derived factors. The fifth was poor and omitted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A valid questionnaire for assessing Australian chiropractic programs has been developed comprising four scales that enquire about: 1) quality of the educational program; 2) provision of student support services; 3) enablement of independent learning; and 4) adequacy of teaching resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":38036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480377/pdf/jcca-65-174.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of education: validation of a questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Stanley I Innes,&nbsp;Norman Stomski,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde,&nbsp;Bruce F Walker\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to validate a questionnaire to address an absence of a measure to evaluate Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of the quality of chiropractic programs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Potential relevant questionnaire items were selected from the Australian chiropractic accreditation standards. Chiropractic students rated these items for clarity and relevance, which resulted in a pilot questionnaire of 47 items. Principal components analysis was used to establish the structure of the scales. Finally, intra-class correlation coefficients were used to establish the scales' test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four items were omitted resulting in the retention of 13 items that strongly loaded onto five factors. Internal consistency was adequate. The test-retest reliability ranged from adequate to good for four of the derived factors. The fifth was poor and omitted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A valid questionnaire for assessing Australian chiropractic programs has been developed comprising four scales that enquire about: 1) quality of the educational program; 2) provision of student support services; 3) enablement of independent learning; and 4) adequacy of teaching resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8480377/pdf/jcca-65-174.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在验证一份问卷,以解决缺乏评估澳大利亚捏脊学生对捏脊项目质量的看法的措施。方法:从澳大利亚捏脊医学认证标准中选取可能相关的问卷项目。脊椎按摩专业的学生对这些问题的清晰度和相关性进行了评分,结果得出了一份包含47个问题的试点问卷。采用主成分分析法建立了量表的结构。最后,采用类内相关系数建立量表的重测信度。结果:遗漏34个题项,保留13个题项,这13个题项强负荷于5个因子。内部一致性是足够的。四个衍生因子的重测信度范围从足够到良好。第五部很差,被省略了。结论:制定了一份有效的评估澳大利亚脊椎指压疗法项目的问卷,包括四个量表,询问:1)教育项目的质量;2)提供学生支援服务;3)自主学习的实现;4)教学资源是否充足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of education: validation of a questionnaire.

Background: This study aimed to validate a questionnaire to address an absence of a measure to evaluate Australian chiropractic students' perceptions of the quality of chiropractic programs.

Method: Potential relevant questionnaire items were selected from the Australian chiropractic accreditation standards. Chiropractic students rated these items for clarity and relevance, which resulted in a pilot questionnaire of 47 items. Principal components analysis was used to establish the structure of the scales. Finally, intra-class correlation coefficients were used to establish the scales' test-retest reliability.

Results: Thirty-four items were omitted resulting in the retention of 13 items that strongly loaded onto five factors. Internal consistency was adequate. The test-retest reliability ranged from adequate to good for four of the derived factors. The fifth was poor and omitted.

Conclusion: A valid questionnaire for assessing Australian chiropractic programs has been developed comprising four scales that enquire about: 1) quality of the educational program; 2) provision of student support services; 3) enablement of independent learning; and 4) adequacy of teaching resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association Health Professions-Chiropractics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (JCCA) publishes research papers, commentaries and editorials relevant to the practice of chiropractic.
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of Herpes zoster and associated differentials. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy in a 68-year-old man diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Contralateral hip joint degeneration associated with a cam-type deformity of the proximal femur in a retired chiropractor: 10-year follow-up. Expanding concussion care in Canada: the role of chiropractors and policy implications. Exploration of chiropractic students' motivation toward the incorporation of new evidence on chiropractic maintenance care: a mixed methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1