重新配置粮食系统治理:联合国粮食安全体系和权力与合法性之争。

Matthew C Canfield, Jessica Duncan, Priscilla Claeys
{"title":"重新配置粮食系统治理:联合国粮食安全体系和权力与合法性之争。","authors":"Matthew C Canfield,&nbsp;Jessica Duncan,&nbsp;Priscilla Claeys","doi":"10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72792,"journal":{"name":"Development (Society for International Development)","volume":"64 3-4","pages":"181-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513380/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C Canfield,&nbsp;Jessica Duncan,&nbsp;Priscilla Claeys\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"volume\":\"64 3-4\",\"pages\":\"181-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development (Society for International Development)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

联合国粮食系统首脑会议是一项雄心勃勃且竞争激烈的活动,它使全球粮食治理的相互竞争的方法得到了缓解。在这篇文章中,我们剖析了围绕如何管理粮食系统的对立观点,重点关注我们认为处于这些分歧核心的两个问题:权威和合法性。我们说明了企业慈善和粮食主权网络如何努力建立粮食系统的认识权威,并通过非常不同的参与和问责制方法产生合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy.

The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Getting to COP27: Bridging Generational Divide Low Carbon Mobility Transitions and Justice: A Case of Costa Rica Challenges and Potential to Revamp the Normative Framework on the Right to Development. The Structural Power of the State-Finance Nexus: Systemic Delinking for the Right to Development. The Future is Public! The Global Reclaiming and Democratization of Public Ownership Beyond the Market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1