电子笔记技术与护理学生学习成绩的关系。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148
Jan Emory, Tabatha Teal, Ginger Holloway
{"title":"电子笔记技术与护理学生学习成绩的关系。","authors":"Jan Emory,&nbsp;Tabatha Teal,&nbsp;Ginger Holloway","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Technological advances have provided alternatives to traditional handwritten note taking that are changing the classroom learning environment in higher education for nursing students.<i>Aims</i>: The purpose of this study was to explore nursing student attitudes and preferences for note taking and the relationship of note taking methods on academic performance. Design: The mixed method approaches collected data from 217 nursing students in a baccalaureate program of study in spring and fall of 2017.<i>Methods</i>: Nursing students at the junior and senior level in the academic program voluntarily participated by completing a survey using a Likert-type scale and open-ended questions.<i>Findings</i>: The majority of students (69.3%) reported taking notes by electronic methods. No significant difference was found between the method of note taking and GPA (<i>p</i> = .139).<i>Conclusions</i>: Findings suggest that multiple variables influence learning in the classroom environment and note taking method has little impact on academic performance. Impact Statement: Educators should consider this finding when implementing policies on classroom electronics, including note taking. Understanding that the preferred method of note taking whether handwritten or electronic has little impact on overall academic performance should inform evidence based teaching and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Emory,&nbsp;Tabatha Teal,&nbsp;Ginger Holloway\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Technological advances have provided alternatives to traditional handwritten note taking that are changing the classroom learning environment in higher education for nursing students.<i>Aims</i>: The purpose of this study was to explore nursing student attitudes and preferences for note taking and the relationship of note taking methods on academic performance. Design: The mixed method approaches collected data from 217 nursing students in a baccalaureate program of study in spring and fall of 2017.<i>Methods</i>: Nursing students at the junior and senior level in the academic program voluntarily participated by completing a survey using a Likert-type scale and open-ended questions.<i>Findings</i>: The majority of students (69.3%) reported taking notes by electronic methods. No significant difference was found between the method of note taking and GPA (<i>p</i> = .139).<i>Conclusions</i>: Findings suggest that multiple variables influence learning in the classroom environment and note taking method has little impact on academic performance. Impact Statement: Educators should consider this finding when implementing policies on classroom electronics, including note taking. Understanding that the preferred method of note taking whether handwritten or electronic has little impact on overall academic performance should inform evidence based teaching and learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Nurse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:技术进步为传统的手写笔记提供了替代方案,正在改变高等教育护理学生的课堂学习环境。目的:本研究旨在探讨护生对笔记的态度和偏好,以及笔记方式与学业成绩的关系。设计:采用混合方法收集2017年春季和秋季217名本科护理专业学生的数据。方法:采用李克特式问卷和开放式问卷调查方式,对专科大三、大四护理学生进行自愿参与。调查结果:绝大多数学生(69.3%)报告使用电子方法做笔记。记录方法与GPA无显著差异(p = 0.139)。结论:研究结果表明,课堂环境中多变量影响学习,笔记方法对学习成绩影响不大。影响陈述:教育工作者在实施课堂电子设备政策时应考虑这一发现,包括记笔记。了解首选的笔记方法,无论是手写的还是电子的,对整体学习成绩的影响很小,应该为基于证据的教学和学习提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students.

Background: Technological advances have provided alternatives to traditional handwritten note taking that are changing the classroom learning environment in higher education for nursing students.Aims: The purpose of this study was to explore nursing student attitudes and preferences for note taking and the relationship of note taking methods on academic performance. Design: The mixed method approaches collected data from 217 nursing students in a baccalaureate program of study in spring and fall of 2017.Methods: Nursing students at the junior and senior level in the academic program voluntarily participated by completing a survey using a Likert-type scale and open-ended questions.Findings: The majority of students (69.3%) reported taking notes by electronic methods. No significant difference was found between the method of note taking and GPA (p = .139).Conclusions: Findings suggest that multiple variables influence learning in the classroom environment and note taking method has little impact on academic performance. Impact Statement: Educators should consider this finding when implementing policies on classroom electronics, including note taking. Understanding that the preferred method of note taking whether handwritten or electronic has little impact on overall academic performance should inform evidence based teaching and learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
The voice of the second-level regulated nursing role: a qualitative approach. Perspectives on the implementation of health informatics curricula frameworks. Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1