对过渡性护理实施跨专业和跨机构过程的试点干预进行现实主义评估。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-24 DOI:10.1080/01621424.2021.1989356
Séverine Schusselé Filliettaz, Stéphane Moiroux, Gregory Marchand, Ingrid Gilles, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
{"title":"对过渡性护理实施跨专业和跨机构过程的试点干预进行现实主义评估。","authors":"Séverine Schusselé Filliettaz,&nbsp;Stéphane Moiroux,&nbsp;Gregory Marchand,&nbsp;Ingrid Gilles,&nbsp;Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux","doi":"10.1080/01621424.2021.1989356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2016, in Switzerland, we implemented transitional interprofessional and interinstitutional shared decision-making processes (IIPs) between a short-stay inpatient care unit (SSU) and primary care professionals. Between 2018 and 2019, we evaluated this intervention using a realist design to answer the following questions: for whom, with whom, in which context and how have IIPs been implemented? Our initial theory was tested via interviews with patients, primary care professionals and staff from the SSU. Results showed that a patient's stay at the SSU, with actors committed to facilitating IIPs, reinforced the perceived appropriateness and implementation of those IIPs. However, this appropriateness varied according to different contextual elements, such as the complexity of needs, preexisting collaborative practices and the purpose of the inpatient stay. Since IIPs occurred in a context of fragmented practices, proactive and sustained efforts are required of the actors implementing them and the organizations supporting them.</p>","PeriodicalId":45875,"journal":{"name":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realist evaluation of a pilot intervention implementing interprofessional and interinstitutional processes for transitional care.\",\"authors\":\"Séverine Schusselé Filliettaz,&nbsp;Stéphane Moiroux,&nbsp;Gregory Marchand,&nbsp;Ingrid Gilles,&nbsp;Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01621424.2021.1989356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2016, in Switzerland, we implemented transitional interprofessional and interinstitutional shared decision-making processes (IIPs) between a short-stay inpatient care unit (SSU) and primary care professionals. Between 2018 and 2019, we evaluated this intervention using a realist design to answer the following questions: for whom, with whom, in which context and how have IIPs been implemented? Our initial theory was tested via interviews with patients, primary care professionals and staff from the SSU. Results showed that a patient's stay at the SSU, with actors committed to facilitating IIPs, reinforced the perceived appropriateness and implementation of those IIPs. However, this appropriateness varied according to different contextual elements, such as the complexity of needs, preexisting collaborative practices and the purpose of the inpatient stay. Since IIPs occurred in a context of fragmented practices, proactive and sustained efforts are required of the actors implementing them and the organizations supporting them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2021.1989356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2021.1989356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年,在瑞士,我们在短期住院护理单位(SSU)和初级保健专业人员之间实施了过渡性的跨专业和跨机构共享决策过程(iip)。在2018年至2019年期间,我们使用现实主义设计评估了这种干预措施,以回答以下问题:为谁,与谁一起,在何种背景下以及如何实施iip ?通过对患者、初级保健专业人员和SSU工作人员的访谈,我们对最初的理论进行了测试。结果表明,患者在SSU的住院期间,行动者致力于促进iip,加强了这些iip的适当性和实施。然而,这种适当性根据不同的背景因素而变化,例如需求的复杂性、先前存在的合作实践和住院病人的目的。由于iip是在支离破碎的实践背景下发生的,因此需要实施它们的参与者和支持它们的组织进行积极和持续的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Realist evaluation of a pilot intervention implementing interprofessional and interinstitutional processes for transitional care.

In 2016, in Switzerland, we implemented transitional interprofessional and interinstitutional shared decision-making processes (IIPs) between a short-stay inpatient care unit (SSU) and primary care professionals. Between 2018 and 2019, we evaluated this intervention using a realist design to answer the following questions: for whom, with whom, in which context and how have IIPs been implemented? Our initial theory was tested via interviews with patients, primary care professionals and staff from the SSU. Results showed that a patient's stay at the SSU, with actors committed to facilitating IIPs, reinforced the perceived appropriateness and implementation of those IIPs. However, this appropriateness varied according to different contextual elements, such as the complexity of needs, preexisting collaborative practices and the purpose of the inpatient stay. Since IIPs occurred in a context of fragmented practices, proactive and sustained efforts are required of the actors implementing them and the organizations supporting them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY
HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES QUARTERLY HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Services Quarterly continues to publish important research on the cutting edge of home care and alternatives to long-term institutional care for the elderly, disabled, and other population groups that use in-home health care and other community services. The journal is aimed toward service providers and health care specialists involved with health care financing, evaluation of services, organization of services, and public policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Elderly Health Care Voucher Scheme in Hong Kong: needs assessment and an evaluation of outcomes. Optimism and resilience among the precariat: a gendered analysis of community home-based care work in South Africa. Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in long-term care from a multidisciplinary perspective: a case study approach. Resilience in home and community care registered practical nurses: a scoping review. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare utilization among Home Care Aides in Washington, U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1