破裂与未破裂椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管造影特征。

Gi Jeong Park, Jae Hoon Cho, Ki Hong Kim
{"title":"破裂与未破裂椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的血管造影特征。","authors":"Gi Jeong Park,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Cho,&nbsp;Ki Hong Kim","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a rare and critical disease. VADA rupture can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage which is a major complication of VADA due to their high rebleeding rate and poor outcome. In the present study, ruptured and unruptured VADAs were compared by analyzing angiographic findings to determine useful predisposing factors for VADA rupture for appropriate treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with VADA treated during a 10-year period were retrospectively identified. The 57 cases diagnosed with VADA were divided into ruptured (n=15) and unruptured (n=42) groups. In addition, each case was analyzed using angiographic 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images. Factors such as length, dilated and stenotic diameter, shape, and vessel around the vertebral artery (VA) were measured and statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ruptured group, stenotic findings of the affected lesion were more common and severe than in the unruptured group. The average stenotic diameter was 2.27 mm (vs. 2.84 mm). And stenotic degree was 62% and 53% in the ruptured and unruptured groups, respectively. Posterior communicating artery (PcomA) flow was more common in the ruptured group (87% vs. 55%, p=0.028). Conclusions: Based on angiographic findings, stenotic lesions, which may be influenced by PcomA flow, are more common in ruptured VADAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","volume":"24 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/3e/jcen-2021-e2021-06-012.PMC8984639.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiographic characteristics of ruptured versus unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm.\",\"authors\":\"Gi Jeong Park,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Cho,&nbsp;Ki Hong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a rare and critical disease. VADA rupture can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage which is a major complication of VADA due to their high rebleeding rate and poor outcome. In the present study, ruptured and unruptured VADAs were compared by analyzing angiographic findings to determine useful predisposing factors for VADA rupture for appropriate treatment selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with VADA treated during a 10-year period were retrospectively identified. The 57 cases diagnosed with VADA were divided into ruptured (n=15) and unruptured (n=42) groups. In addition, each case was analyzed using angiographic 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images. Factors such as length, dilated and stenotic diameter, shape, and vessel around the vertebral artery (VA) were measured and statistically compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the ruptured group, stenotic findings of the affected lesion were more common and severe than in the unruptured group. The average stenotic diameter was 2.27 mm (vs. 2.84 mm). And stenotic degree was 62% and 53% in the ruptured and unruptured groups, respectively. Posterior communicating artery (PcomA) flow was more common in the ruptured group (87% vs. 55%, p=0.028). Conclusions: Based on angiographic findings, stenotic lesions, which may be influenced by PcomA flow, are more common in ruptured VADAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/3e/jcen-2021-e2021-06-012.PMC8984639.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(VADA)是一种罕见的危重疾病。VADA破裂可引起蛛网膜下腔出血,因其再出血率高,预后差,是VADA的主要并发症。在本研究中,通过分析血管造影结果,比较破裂和未破裂的VADA,以确定VADA破裂的有用易感因素,从而选择适当的治疗方法。方法:对10年间接受VADA治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。57例VADA患者分为破裂组(n=15)和未破裂组(n=42)。此外,使用血管造影三维重建图像对每个病例进行分析。测量长度、扩张和狭窄直径、形状和椎动脉周围血管(VA)等因素并进行统计学比较。结果:与未破裂组相比,破裂组的病变狭窄表现更为常见和严重。平均狭窄直径为2.27 mm (vs. 2.84 mm)。破裂组和未破裂组的狭窄程度分别为62%和53%。后交通动脉(PcomA)血流在破裂组中更为常见(87%比55%,p=0.028)。结论:根据血管造影结果,可能受PcomA血流影响的狭窄病变在破裂的vada中更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Angiographic characteristics of ruptured versus unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm.

Objective: Vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a rare and critical disease. VADA rupture can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage which is a major complication of VADA due to their high rebleeding rate and poor outcome. In the present study, ruptured and unruptured VADAs were compared by analyzing angiographic findings to determine useful predisposing factors for VADA rupture for appropriate treatment selection.

Methods: Subjects with VADA treated during a 10-year period were retrospectively identified. The 57 cases diagnosed with VADA were divided into ruptured (n=15) and unruptured (n=42) groups. In addition, each case was analyzed using angiographic 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images. Factors such as length, dilated and stenotic diameter, shape, and vessel around the vertebral artery (VA) were measured and statistically compared.

Results: In the ruptured group, stenotic findings of the affected lesion were more common and severe than in the unruptured group. The average stenotic diameter was 2.27 mm (vs. 2.84 mm). And stenotic degree was 62% and 53% in the ruptured and unruptured groups, respectively. Posterior communicating artery (PcomA) flow was more common in the ruptured group (87% vs. 55%, p=0.028). Conclusions: Based on angiographic findings, stenotic lesions, which may be influenced by PcomA flow, are more common in ruptured VADAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Curative transvenous embolization for congenital multi-hole pial arteriovenous fistula. Flow diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population: Two case reports and literature review. Surgical considerations and techniques using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistula. Navigation guided small craniectomy and direct cannulation of pure isolated sigmoid sinus for treatment of dural arteriovenous fistula. Treatment of a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm in the context of complex cardio-cerebrovascular variations using the Tubridge flow diverter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1