Amine Maamri, Fabian N Fries, Corinna Spira-Eppig, Timo Eppig, Berthold Seitz
{"title":"[萨尔大学眼科医院引入FIDUS电子患者档案后的员工调查]。","authors":"Amine Maamri, Fabian N Fries, Corinna Spira-Eppig, Timo Eppig, Berthold Seitz","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for \"record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten\" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":" ","pages":"471-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076743/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].\",\"authors\":\"Amine Maamri, Fabian N Fries, Corinna Spira-Eppig, Timo Eppig, Berthold Seitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for \\\"record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten\\\" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"471-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].
Aim: This study compared Saarland University Eye Hospital employees' satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record between December 2016 and September 2020, after its introduction in January 2016.
Methods: For the retrospective study, the FIDUS team at the Saarland University Eye Hospital created a questionnaire which was distributed to all participants (physicians, nursing staff, and administrative staff) in December 2016 and September 2020. The questionnaire contained 19 questions, each scored from 0 to 10 (0: disagree; 5: partly agree; 10: completely agree).
Results: The number of participants increased significantly from 60/136 (47%) to 89/140 (64%) between 2016 and 2020. Of these participants, 23 (25.8%) were physicians, 27 (30.3%) were nurses, 12 (13.4%) were in administration, 16 (17.9%) were in other employment, and 11 (12.3%) did not disclose their employment. In 2020, 75.6% of employees agreed with a score of 10 that implementation of electronic medical records was the right step, compared to only 36.7% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The highest rating for "record entries are faster to write with a computer than handwritten" was obtained in 38% in 2020 vs. 25% in 2016 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Satisfaction with the FIDUS electronic patient record has improved significantly in 2020 compared to 2016, particularly concerning file clarity and faster workflows. The proportion of respondents who see their initial expectations of electronic patient files as 100% fulfilled has tripled. However, there is still a need for optimization of details.
期刊介绍:
Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.