注意力要求快速连续视觉呈现任务中无关信息的老化和选择性抑制。

Brain and neuroscience advances Pub Date : 2022-01-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23982128211073427
Maegen E Walker, Jonas F Vibell, Andrew D Dewald, Scott Sinnett
{"title":"注意力要求快速连续视觉呈现任务中无关信息的老化和选择性抑制。","authors":"Maegen E Walker,&nbsp;Jonas F Vibell,&nbsp;Andrew D Dewald,&nbsp;Scott Sinnett","doi":"10.1177/23982128211073427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention involves both an ability to selectively focus on relevant information and simultaneously ignore irrelevant information (i.e. inhibitory control). Many factors impact inhibitory control such as individual differences, relative timing of stimuli presentation, distractor characteristics, and participant age. Previous research with young adults responding to an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentations of pictures superimposed with task-irrelevant words evaluated the extent to which unattended information may be subject to inhibitory control. Surprise recognition tests following the rapid serial visual presentation task showed that recognition for unattended words presented with non-targets (i.e. non-aligned or 'NA' words) during the rapid serial visual presentation task were recognised at chance levels. However, when the unattended words were infrequently paired with the attended picture targets (i.e. target-aligned or 'TA' words), recognition rates were significantly below chance and significantly lower compared to NA words, suggesting selective inhibitory control for the previously unattended TA words. The current study adapted this paradigm to compare healthy younger and older adults' ability to engage in inhibitory control. In line with previous research, younger adults demonstrated selective inhibition with recognition rates for TA words significantly lower than NA words and chance, while NA words were recognised at chance levels. However, older adults showed no difference in recognition rates between word types (TA versus NA). Rather all items were recognised at rates significantly below chance suggesting inhibited recognition for all unattended words, regardless of when they were presented during the primary task. Finally, older adults recognised significantly fewer NA words compared to young adults. These findings suggest that older adults may experience a decline in their ability to selectively inhibit the processing of irrelevant information, while maintaining the capacity to exercise global inhibition over unattended lexical information.</p>","PeriodicalId":72444,"journal":{"name":"Brain and neuroscience advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/db/10.1177_23982128211073427.PMC8793383.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ageing and selective inhibition of irrelevant information in an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentation task.\",\"authors\":\"Maegen E Walker,&nbsp;Jonas F Vibell,&nbsp;Andrew D Dewald,&nbsp;Scott Sinnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23982128211073427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Attention involves both an ability to selectively focus on relevant information and simultaneously ignore irrelevant information (i.e. inhibitory control). Many factors impact inhibitory control such as individual differences, relative timing of stimuli presentation, distractor characteristics, and participant age. Previous research with young adults responding to an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentations of pictures superimposed with task-irrelevant words evaluated the extent to which unattended information may be subject to inhibitory control. Surprise recognition tests following the rapid serial visual presentation task showed that recognition for unattended words presented with non-targets (i.e. non-aligned or 'NA' words) during the rapid serial visual presentation task were recognised at chance levels. However, when the unattended words were infrequently paired with the attended picture targets (i.e. target-aligned or 'TA' words), recognition rates were significantly below chance and significantly lower compared to NA words, suggesting selective inhibitory control for the previously unattended TA words. The current study adapted this paradigm to compare healthy younger and older adults' ability to engage in inhibitory control. In line with previous research, younger adults demonstrated selective inhibition with recognition rates for TA words significantly lower than NA words and chance, while NA words were recognised at chance levels. However, older adults showed no difference in recognition rates between word types (TA versus NA). Rather all items were recognised at rates significantly below chance suggesting inhibited recognition for all unattended words, regardless of when they were presented during the primary task. Finally, older adults recognised significantly fewer NA words compared to young adults. These findings suggest that older adults may experience a decline in their ability to selectively inhibit the processing of irrelevant information, while maintaining the capacity to exercise global inhibition over unattended lexical information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and neuroscience advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/db/10.1177_23982128211073427.PMC8793383.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and neuroscience advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23982128211073427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and neuroscience advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23982128211073427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

注意力既包括选择性地关注相关信息的能力,也包括同时忽略无关信息的能力(即抑制控制)。许多因素影响抑制控制,如个体差异、刺激呈现的相对时间、干扰物特征和参与者年龄。先前的一项研究是针对年轻人对需要注意力的快速连续视觉呈现的图片做出反应,这些图片叠加了与任务无关的单词,评估了无人注意的信息可能受到抑制控制的程度。在快速连续视觉呈现任务之后的惊喜识别测试表明,在快速连续视觉呈现任务中,对与非目标(即不对齐或“NA”单词)一起呈现的无人注意单词的识别是在偶然水平上被识别的。然而,当未被注意的单词很少与被注意的图片目标配对时(即与目标对齐或“TA”单词),识别率显著低于机会,并且明显低于NA单词,这表明之前未被注意的TA单词存在选择性抑制控制。目前的研究采用这种模式来比较健康的年轻人和老年人参与抑制控制的能力。与之前的研究一致,年轻人表现出选择性抑制,TA词的识别率显著低于NA词和chance词,而NA词的识别率在chance水平上。然而,老年人在字型之间的识别率没有差异(TA与NA)。相反,所有项目的识别率都明显低于机会,这表明对所有未被注意的单词的识别受到抑制,无论它们在主要任务中何时出现。最后,与年轻人相比,老年人识别的NA词明显更少。这些发现表明,老年人选择性抑制不相关信息处理的能力可能会下降,同时保持对无人关注的词汇信息进行全面抑制的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ageing and selective inhibition of irrelevant information in an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentation task.

Attention involves both an ability to selectively focus on relevant information and simultaneously ignore irrelevant information (i.e. inhibitory control). Many factors impact inhibitory control such as individual differences, relative timing of stimuli presentation, distractor characteristics, and participant age. Previous research with young adults responding to an attention-demanding rapid serial visual presentations of pictures superimposed with task-irrelevant words evaluated the extent to which unattended information may be subject to inhibitory control. Surprise recognition tests following the rapid serial visual presentation task showed that recognition for unattended words presented with non-targets (i.e. non-aligned or 'NA' words) during the rapid serial visual presentation task were recognised at chance levels. However, when the unattended words were infrequently paired with the attended picture targets (i.e. target-aligned or 'TA' words), recognition rates were significantly below chance and significantly lower compared to NA words, suggesting selective inhibitory control for the previously unattended TA words. The current study adapted this paradigm to compare healthy younger and older adults' ability to engage in inhibitory control. In line with previous research, younger adults demonstrated selective inhibition with recognition rates for TA words significantly lower than NA words and chance, while NA words were recognised at chance levels. However, older adults showed no difference in recognition rates between word types (TA versus NA). Rather all items were recognised at rates significantly below chance suggesting inhibited recognition for all unattended words, regardless of when they were presented during the primary task. Finally, older adults recognised significantly fewer NA words compared to young adults. These findings suggest that older adults may experience a decline in their ability to selectively inhibit the processing of irrelevant information, while maintaining the capacity to exercise global inhibition over unattended lexical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Not all plaques are created equal: Uncovering a unique molecular signature in Alzheimer's disease. Children aged 5-13 years show adult-like disgust avoidance, but not proto-nausea. Brain mechanisms of temporal processing in impulsivity: Relevance to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Does theta synchronicity of sensory information enhance associative memory? Replicating the theta-induced memory effect. A multimodal approach connecting cortical and behavioural responses to the visual continuity illusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1