左旋多巴刺激试验预测各种帕金森病运动亚型的STN-DBS结果:更准确的判断

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2021-10-21 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/4762027
Zijian Zheng, Zixiao Yin, Bohan Zhang, Houyou Fan, Dan Liu, Yuancheng Zhou, Jian Duan, Dongwei Zhou, Xi Wu, Guohui Lu
{"title":"左旋多巴刺激试验预测各种帕金森病运动亚型的STN-DBS结果:更准确的判断","authors":"Zijian Zheng,&nbsp;Zixiao Yin,&nbsp;Bohan Zhang,&nbsp;Houyou Fan,&nbsp;Dan Liu,&nbsp;Yuancheng Zhou,&nbsp;Jian Duan,&nbsp;Dongwei Zhou,&nbsp;Xi Wu,&nbsp;Guohui Lu","doi":"10.1155/2021/4762027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (<i>p</i> = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51299,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553443/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levodopa Challenge Test Predicts STN-DBS Outcomes in Various Parkinson's Disease Motor Subtypes: A More Accurate Judgment.\",\"authors\":\"Zijian Zheng,&nbsp;Zixiao Yin,&nbsp;Bohan Zhang,&nbsp;Houyou Fan,&nbsp;Dan Liu,&nbsp;Yuancheng Zhou,&nbsp;Jian Duan,&nbsp;Dongwei Zhou,&nbsp;Xi Wu,&nbsp;Guohui Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/4762027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (<i>p</i> = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553443/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4762027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4762027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:左旋多巴激发试验(LDCT)与帕金森病(PD)患者术后丘脑下核-深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)获益之间的关系存在争议。我们的目的是评估总左旋多巴反应(TLR)和症状左旋多巴反应(SLR)在预测不同PD运动亚型术后改善方面的价值。方法:研究分为训练集(147例)和验证集(304例)。我们回顾性收集了147名接受统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS-) III和帕金森病问卷(PDQ-) 39评估的患者的数据。患者分为震颤主导型(TD)、动硬主导型(AR)和混合型(MX)组。临床重要差异(CID)用于DBS效果的二分类。对于来自训练集的每个亚型组的患者,我们使用相关性和接受者算子特征(ROC)曲线分析来探索它们之间关系的强度。通过DeLong试验计算和比较曲线下面积(auc)。将训练集的结果应用于验证集,以预测不同PD运动亚型的术后改善。结果:在验证队列中,TLR与MX组术后运动(p < 0.001)和生活质量(QOL)改善(p < 0.001)显著相关。TLR与UPDRS-III之间的AUC (TU)为0.800。TLR与PDQ-39 (TP)之间的AUC为0.770。TU和TP的相关标准都在50%左右。AR组仅SLR与PDQ-39 (SP)有较强相关性(p < 0.001)。SP的AUC显著大于TLR和PDQ-39 (TP) (p = 0.034)。SP的相关标准约为37%。在TD组中没有发现明显的相关性。结论:本方法对LDCT的判断更为准确。TLR与MX患者术后UPDRS-III和PDQ-39改善密切相关。TLR > 50%可能表明与单纯药物治疗相比,STN-DBS更有可能获得临床有意义的益处。单反能很好地预测AR患者生活质量的改善。同样,SLR > 37%可能表明STN-DBS有更高的临床显著获益的可能性。LDCT为TD患者提供的信息有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Levodopa Challenge Test Predicts STN-DBS Outcomes in Various Parkinson's Disease Motor Subtypes: A More Accurate Judgment.

Background: The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.

Methods: Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes.

Results: In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (p < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (p = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group.

Conclusions: We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Rat Infant Model of Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Reveals New Insight into the Molecular Biology and Epileptogenesis in the Developing Brain. Retracted: Sports Augmented Cognitive Benefits: An fMRI Study of Executive Function with Go/NoGo Task Vasoprotective Effects of Hyperoside against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rats: Activation of Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels. Acupuncture Alleviates CUMS-Induced Depression-Like Behaviors by Restoring Prefrontal Cortex Neuroplasticity. Functional Connectivity Changes in the Insular Subregions of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea after 6 Months of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1