危重病人疼痛作用单元检测。

Subhash Nerella, Julie Cupka, Matthew Ruppert, Patrick Tighe, Azra Bihorac, Parisa Rashidi
{"title":"危重病人疼痛作用单元检测。","authors":"Subhash Nerella,&nbsp;Julie Cupka,&nbsp;Matthew Ruppert,&nbsp;Patrick Tighe,&nbsp;Azra Bihorac,&nbsp;Parisa Rashidi","doi":"10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existing pain assessment methods in the intensive care unit rely on patient self-report or visual observation by nurses. Patient self-report is subjective and can suffer from poor recall. In the case of non-verbal patients, behavioral pain assessment methods provide limited granularity, are subjective, and put additional burden on already overworked staff. Previous studies have shown the feasibility of autonomous pain expression assessment by detecting Facial Action Units (AUs). However, previous approaches for detecting facial pain AUs are historically limited to controlled environments. In this study, for the first time, we collected and annotated a pain-related AU dataset, <i>Pain-ICU</i>, containing 55,085 images from critically ill adult patients. We evaluated the performance of OpenFace, an open-source facial behavior analysis tool, and the trained AU R-CNN model on our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset. Variables such as assisted breathing devices, environmental lighting, and patient orientation with respect to the camera make AU detection harder than with controlled settings. Although OpenFace has shown state-of-the-art results in general purpose AU detection tasks, it could not accurately detect AUs in our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset (F1-score 0.42). To address this problem, we trained the AU R-CNN model on our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset, resulting in a satisfactory average F1-score 0.77. In this study, we show the feasibility of detecting facial pain AUs in uncontrolled ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74502,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC","volume":"2021 ","pages":"645-651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552410/pdf/nihms-1747870.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Action Unit Detection in Critically Ill Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Subhash Nerella,&nbsp;Julie Cupka,&nbsp;Matthew Ruppert,&nbsp;Patrick Tighe,&nbsp;Azra Bihorac,&nbsp;Parisa Rashidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Existing pain assessment methods in the intensive care unit rely on patient self-report or visual observation by nurses. Patient self-report is subjective and can suffer from poor recall. In the case of non-verbal patients, behavioral pain assessment methods provide limited granularity, are subjective, and put additional burden on already overworked staff. Previous studies have shown the feasibility of autonomous pain expression assessment by detecting Facial Action Units (AUs). However, previous approaches for detecting facial pain AUs are historically limited to controlled environments. In this study, for the first time, we collected and annotated a pain-related AU dataset, <i>Pain-ICU</i>, containing 55,085 images from critically ill adult patients. We evaluated the performance of OpenFace, an open-source facial behavior analysis tool, and the trained AU R-CNN model on our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset. Variables such as assisted breathing devices, environmental lighting, and patient orientation with respect to the camera make AU detection harder than with controlled settings. Although OpenFace has shown state-of-the-art results in general purpose AU detection tasks, it could not accurately detect AUs in our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset (F1-score 0.42). To address this problem, we trained the AU R-CNN model on our <i>Pain-ICU</i> dataset, resulting in a satisfactory average F1-score 0.77. In this study, we show the feasibility of detecting facial pain AUs in uncontrolled ICU settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"645-651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8552410/pdf/nihms-1747870.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

重症监护室现有的疼痛评估方法依赖于患者自述或护士目视观察。患者的自我报告是主观的,可能会出现记忆力差的情况。对于非语言患者,行为疼痛评估方法提供的粒度有限,是主观的,并且给已经超负荷工作的工作人员增加了额外的负担。先前的研究表明,通过检测面部动作单元(AUs)来自主评估疼痛表情是可行的。然而,以前检测面部疼痛AUs的方法历史上仅限于受控环境。在这项研究中,我们首次收集并注释了一个与疼痛相关的AU数据集Pain-ICU,其中包含来自危重成人患者的55,085张图像。我们在Pain-ICU数据集上评估了OpenFace(一个开源的面部行为分析工具)和训练好的AU R-CNN模型的性能。辅助呼吸装置、环境照明和患者相对于相机的方向等变量使得AU检测比受控设置更难。尽管OpenFace在通用AU检测任务中显示了最先进的结果,但它不能准确地检测我们的Pain-ICU数据集中的AU (F1-score 0.42)。为了解决这个问题,我们在Pain-ICU数据集上训练AU R-CNN模型,得到了令人满意的平均f1得分0.77。在这项研究中,我们展示了在无控制的ICU环境中检测面部疼痛AUs的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Action Unit Detection in Critically Ill Patients.

Existing pain assessment methods in the intensive care unit rely on patient self-report or visual observation by nurses. Patient self-report is subjective and can suffer from poor recall. In the case of non-verbal patients, behavioral pain assessment methods provide limited granularity, are subjective, and put additional burden on already overworked staff. Previous studies have shown the feasibility of autonomous pain expression assessment by detecting Facial Action Units (AUs). However, previous approaches for detecting facial pain AUs are historically limited to controlled environments. In this study, for the first time, we collected and annotated a pain-related AU dataset, Pain-ICU, containing 55,085 images from critically ill adult patients. We evaluated the performance of OpenFace, an open-source facial behavior analysis tool, and the trained AU R-CNN model on our Pain-ICU dataset. Variables such as assisted breathing devices, environmental lighting, and patient orientation with respect to the camera make AU detection harder than with controlled settings. Although OpenFace has shown state-of-the-art results in general purpose AU detection tasks, it could not accurately detect AUs in our Pain-ICU dataset (F1-score 0.42). To address this problem, we trained the AU R-CNN model on our Pain-ICU dataset, resulting in a satisfactory average F1-score 0.77. In this study, we show the feasibility of detecting facial pain AUs in uncontrolled ICU settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Conversational Agents and Their Applications for Self-Management of Chronic Conditions. Towards Developing a Voice-activated Self-monitoring Application (VoiS) for Adults with Diabetes and Hypertension. Message from the 2022 Program Chairs-in-Chief Welcome - from Sorel Reisman COMPSAC Standing Committee Chair Message from the Standing Committee Vice Chairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1