深度学习模型提高了放射科医生在乳腺病变检测和分类方面的表现。

Yingshi Sun, Yuhong Qu, Dong Wang, Yi Li, Lin Ye, Jingbo Du, Bing Xu, Baoqing Li, Xiaoting Li, Kexin Zhang, Yanjie Shi, Ruijia Sun, Yichuan Wang, Rong Long, Dengbo Chen, Haijiao Li, Liwei Wang, Min Cao
{"title":"深度学习模型提高了放射科医生在乳腺病变检测和分类方面的表现。","authors":"Yingshi Sun,&nbsp;Yuhong Qu,&nbsp;Dong Wang,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Lin Ye,&nbsp;Jingbo Du,&nbsp;Bing Xu,&nbsp;Baoqing Li,&nbsp;Xiaoting Li,&nbsp;Kexin Zhang,&nbsp;Yanjie Shi,&nbsp;Ruijia Sun,&nbsp;Yichuan Wang,&nbsp;Rong Long,&nbsp;Dengbo Chen,&nbsp;Haijiao Li,&nbsp;Liwei Wang,&nbsp;Min Cao","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning algorithms has been initially applied in the field of mammography, but there is no large-scale clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study proposed to develop and verify an artificial intelligence model based on mammography. Firstly, mammograms retrospectively collected from six centers were randomized to a training dataset and a validation dataset for establishing the model. Secondly, the model was tested by comparing 12 radiologists' performance with and without it. Finally, prospectively enrolled women with mammograms from six centers were diagnosed by radiologists with the model. The detection and diagnostic capabilities were evaluated using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve and ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of model for detecting lesions after matching was 0.908 for false positive rate of 0.25 in unilateral images. The area under ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish the benign lesions from malignant lesions was 0.855 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]. The performance of 12 radiologists with the model was higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.852 <i>vs</i>. 0.805, P=0.005). The mean reading time of with the model was shorter than that of reading alone (80.18 s <i>vs</i>. 62.28 s, P=0.032). In prospective application, the sensitivity of detection reached 0.887 at false positive rate of 0.25; the AUC of radiologists with the model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.36%, 98.07%, 87.76%, and 99.09%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The artificial intelligence model exhibits high accuracy for detecting and diagnosing breast lesions, improves diagnostic accuracy and saves time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9830,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","volume":"33 6","pages":"682-693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/3d/cjcr-33-6-682.PMC8742176.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning model improves radiologists' performance in detection and classification of breast lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Yingshi Sun,&nbsp;Yuhong Qu,&nbsp;Dong Wang,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Lin Ye,&nbsp;Jingbo Du,&nbsp;Bing Xu,&nbsp;Baoqing Li,&nbsp;Xiaoting Li,&nbsp;Kexin Zhang,&nbsp;Yanjie Shi,&nbsp;Ruijia Sun,&nbsp;Yichuan Wang,&nbsp;Rong Long,&nbsp;Dengbo Chen,&nbsp;Haijiao Li,&nbsp;Liwei Wang,&nbsp;Min Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning algorithms has been initially applied in the field of mammography, but there is no large-scale clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study proposed to develop and verify an artificial intelligence model based on mammography. Firstly, mammograms retrospectively collected from six centers were randomized to a training dataset and a validation dataset for establishing the model. Secondly, the model was tested by comparing 12 radiologists' performance with and without it. Finally, prospectively enrolled women with mammograms from six centers were diagnosed by radiologists with the model. The detection and diagnostic capabilities were evaluated using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve and ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of model for detecting lesions after matching was 0.908 for false positive rate of 0.25 in unilateral images. The area under ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish the benign lesions from malignant lesions was 0.855 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]. The performance of 12 radiologists with the model was higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.852 <i>vs</i>. 0.805, P=0.005). The mean reading time of with the model was shorter than that of reading alone (80.18 s <i>vs</i>. 62.28 s, P=0.032). In prospective application, the sensitivity of detection reached 0.887 at false positive rate of 0.25; the AUC of radiologists with the model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.36%, 98.07%, 87.76%, and 99.09%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The artificial intelligence model exhibits high accuracy for detecting and diagnosing breast lesions, improves diagnostic accuracy and saves time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"682-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/3d/cjcr-33-6-682.PMC8742176.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:基于深度学习算法的计算机辅助诊断已初步应用于乳腺x线摄影领域,但尚未大规模临床应用。方法:本研究提出开发并验证基于乳房x线摄影的人工智能模型。首先,回顾性收集6个中心的乳房x线照片,随机分配到训练数据集和验证数据集,用于建立模型。其次,通过比较12名放射科医生使用和不使用该模型的表现来测试该模型。最后,从六个中心接受乳房x光检查的前瞻性妇女由放射科医生用该模型进行诊断。采用自由反应受者工作特征(FROC)曲线和ROC曲线评估检测和诊断能力。结果:该模型对单侧图像匹配后病变的检测灵敏度为0.908,假阳性率为0.25。区分良、恶性病变的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.855[95%可信区间(95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]。使用该模型的12名放射科医生的表现高于单独放射科医生(AUC: 0.852 vs. 0.805, P=0.005)。使用该模型时的平均阅读时间比单独阅读时短(80.18 s vs. 62.28 s, P=0.032)。在前瞻性应用中,检测灵敏度达到0.887,假阳性率为0.25;使用该模型的放射科医师AUC为0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988),敏感性94.36%,特异性98.07%,阳性预测值(PPV) 87.76%,阴性预测值(NPV) 99.09%。结论:人工智能模型对乳腺病变的检测诊断准确率高,提高了诊断准确率,节省了诊断时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning model improves radiologists' performance in detection and classification of breast lesions.

Objective: Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning algorithms has been initially applied in the field of mammography, but there is no large-scale clinical application.

Methods: This study proposed to develop and verify an artificial intelligence model based on mammography. Firstly, mammograms retrospectively collected from six centers were randomized to a training dataset and a validation dataset for establishing the model. Secondly, the model was tested by comparing 12 radiologists' performance with and without it. Finally, prospectively enrolled women with mammograms from six centers were diagnosed by radiologists with the model. The detection and diagnostic capabilities were evaluated using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve and ROC curve.

Results: The sensitivity of model for detecting lesions after matching was 0.908 for false positive rate of 0.25 in unilateral images. The area under ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish the benign lesions from malignant lesions was 0.855 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]. The performance of 12 radiologists with the model was higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.852 vs. 0.805, P=0.005). The mean reading time of with the model was shorter than that of reading alone (80.18 s vs. 62.28 s, P=0.032). In prospective application, the sensitivity of detection reached 0.887 at false positive rate of 0.25; the AUC of radiologists with the model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.36%, 98.07%, 87.76%, and 99.09%, respectively.

Conclusions: The artificial intelligence model exhibits high accuracy for detecting and diagnosing breast lesions, improves diagnostic accuracy and saves time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a multiprocess deep-learning system: A multicenter study. Striatins and STRIPAK complex partners in clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer and responses to drug treatment. Focal ablation therapy presents promising results for selectively localized prostate cancer patients. Research progress of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer. Impact of preoperative therapy on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1