糖尿病和非糖尿病下肢伤口中的微生物种类和抗生素耐药性:一项横断面比较研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-06 DOI:10.1177/15347346211053936
Vanessa P Dos Santos, Maria G M de Andrade Barberino, Carlos A S Alves
{"title":"糖尿病和非糖尿病下肢伤口中的微生物种类和抗生素耐药性:一项横断面比较研究。","authors":"Vanessa P Dos Santos, Maria G M de Andrade Barberino, Carlos A S Alves","doi":"10.1177/15347346211053936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe lower extremity wounds have an increased risk of complications and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance of wounds in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out at a public hospital including 111 patients with moderate to severe wound infections. Tissue samples were collected during a surgical procedure. One hundred and four patients (94%) had positive cultures and 88 (79%) had a Gram-negative microorganism. Among the 185 cultured microorganisms, 133 (72%) were Gram-negative species. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (23 cases) was the most isolated Gram-negative species, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (26 cases) was the most prevalent Gram-positive species. Among 185 isolated species, 45 (24%) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, 23 (12%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 5 (3%) were methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance among patients with lower extremity wounds whether they were diabetic or nondiabetic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Species and Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Lower Extremity Wounds: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa P Dos Santos, Maria G M de Andrade Barberino, Carlos A S Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346211053936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Severe lower extremity wounds have an increased risk of complications and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance of wounds in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out at a public hospital including 111 patients with moderate to severe wound infections. Tissue samples were collected during a surgical procedure. One hundred and four patients (94%) had positive cultures and 88 (79%) had a Gram-negative microorganism. Among the 185 cultured microorganisms, 133 (72%) were Gram-negative species. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (23 cases) was the most isolated Gram-negative species, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (26 cases) was the most prevalent Gram-positive species. Among 185 isolated species, 45 (24%) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, 23 (12%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 5 (3%) were methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance among patients with lower extremity wounds whether they were diabetic or nondiabetic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"338-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211053936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211053936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重的下肢伤口会增加并发症和肢体缺失的风险。本研究旨在评估和比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者伤口的微生物特征和抗生素耐药性。一项横断面比较研究在一家公立医院进行,包括 111 名中重度伤口感染患者。组织样本是在手术过程中采集的。104 名患者(94%)的培养结果呈阳性,88 名患者(79%)的培养结果呈革兰氏阴性微生物阳性。在培养出的 185 种微生物中,133 种(72%)为革兰氏阴性菌。铜绿假单胞菌(23 例)是最常见的革兰氏阴性菌,粪肠球菌(26 例)是最常见的革兰氏阳性菌。在 185 个分离出的菌种中,45 个(24%)为广谱β-内酰胺酶产生菌,23 个(12%)为耐碳青霉烯菌,5 个(3%)为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。研究结果表明,下肢伤口患者无论是否患有糖尿病,在微生物特征和抗生素耐药性方面均无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbiological Species and Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Lower Extremity Wounds: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Severe lower extremity wounds have an increased risk of complications and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance of wounds in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out at a public hospital including 111 patients with moderate to severe wound infections. Tissue samples were collected during a surgical procedure. One hundred and four patients (94%) had positive cultures and 88 (79%) had a Gram-negative microorganism. Among the 185 cultured microorganisms, 133 (72%) were Gram-negative species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23 cases) was the most isolated Gram-negative species, and Enterococcus faecalis (26 cases) was the most prevalent Gram-positive species. Among 185 isolated species, 45 (24%) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, 23 (12%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 5 (3%) were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance among patients with lower extremity wounds whether they were diabetic or nondiabetic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Identification of High-Risk Lower Extremity Wounds Using Point-of-Care Test for Bacterial Protease Activity; A Single-Centre, Single-Blinded, Prospective Study Retracted: "The Leg Subcutaneous Tissue Calcification and Venous Ulcer-a Case Series". Sticking to What Matters: A Matched Comparative Study of Fibrin Glue and Mechanical Fixation for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in the Lower Extremity. Cases of Lower Extremity and Perianal Burns at the Burn Center in the Southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Superficial Tissue Swabs Versus Deep Tissue Samples in the Detection of Microbiological Profile of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1