预测产品情绪评级的深度学习方法:比较分析。

IF 2.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of Supercomputing Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s11227-021-04169-6
Vimala Balakrishnan, Zhongliang Shi, Chuan Liang Law, Regine Lim, Lee Leng Teh, Yue Fan
{"title":"预测产品情绪评级的深度学习方法:比较分析。","authors":"Vimala Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Zhongliang Shi,&nbsp;Chuan Liang Law,&nbsp;Regine Lim,&nbsp;Lee Leng Teh,&nbsp;Yue Fan","doi":"10.1007/s11227-021-04169-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a benchmark comparison of several deep learning models including Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Network and Bi-directional Long Short Term Memory, assessed based on various word embedding approaches, including the Bi-directional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its variants, FastText and Word2Vec. Data augmentation was administered using the Easy Data Augmentation approach resulting in two datasets (original versus augmented). All the models were assessed in two setups, namely 5-class versus 3-class (i.e., compressed version). Findings show the best prediction models were Neural Network-based using Word2Vec, with CNN-RNN-Bi-LSTM producing the highest accuracy (96%) and <i>F</i>-score (91.1%). Individually, RNN was the best model with an accuracy of 87.5% and <i>F</i>-score of 83.5%, while RoBERTa had the best <i>F</i>-score of 73.1%. The study shows that deep learning is better for analyzing the sentiments within the text compared to supervised machine learning and provides a direction for future work and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supercomputing","volume":"78 5","pages":"7206-7226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569508/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A deep learning approach in predicting products' sentiment ratings: a comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vimala Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Zhongliang Shi,&nbsp;Chuan Liang Law,&nbsp;Regine Lim,&nbsp;Lee Leng Teh,&nbsp;Yue Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11227-021-04169-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present a benchmark comparison of several deep learning models including Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Network and Bi-directional Long Short Term Memory, assessed based on various word embedding approaches, including the Bi-directional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its variants, FastText and Word2Vec. Data augmentation was administered using the Easy Data Augmentation approach resulting in two datasets (original versus augmented). All the models were assessed in two setups, namely 5-class versus 3-class (i.e., compressed version). Findings show the best prediction models were Neural Network-based using Word2Vec, with CNN-RNN-Bi-LSTM producing the highest accuracy (96%) and <i>F</i>-score (91.1%). Individually, RNN was the best model with an accuracy of 87.5% and <i>F</i>-score of 83.5%, while RoBERTa had the best <i>F</i>-score of 73.1%. The study shows that deep learning is better for analyzing the sentiments within the text compared to supervised machine learning and provides a direction for future work and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supercomputing\",\"volume\":\"78 5\",\"pages\":\"7206-7226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supercomputing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04169-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supercomputing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04169-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

我们提出了几种深度学习模型的基准比较,包括卷积神经网络,循环神经网络和双向长短期记忆,基于各种词嵌入方法进行评估,包括来自变形器(BERT)及其变体,FastText和Word2Vec的双向编码器表示。使用简易数据增强方法进行数据增强,产生两个数据集(原始数据集与增强数据集)。所有模型以两种设置进行评估,即5级与3级(即压缩版本)。结果表明,基于Word2Vec的神经网络预测模型效果最好,其中CNN-RNN-Bi-LSTM预测准确率最高(96%),f值最高(91.1%)。单独来看,RNN是最好的模型,准确率为87.5%,f值为83.5%,RoBERTa的f值为73.1%。研究表明,与有监督的机器学习相比,深度学习更适合分析文本中的情感,并为未来的工作和研究提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A deep learning approach in predicting products' sentiment ratings: a comparative analysis.

We present a benchmark comparison of several deep learning models including Convolutional Neural Networks, Recurrent Neural Network and Bi-directional Long Short Term Memory, assessed based on various word embedding approaches, including the Bi-directional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its variants, FastText and Word2Vec. Data augmentation was administered using the Easy Data Augmentation approach resulting in two datasets (original versus augmented). All the models were assessed in two setups, namely 5-class versus 3-class (i.e., compressed version). Findings show the best prediction models were Neural Network-based using Word2Vec, with CNN-RNN-Bi-LSTM producing the highest accuracy (96%) and F-score (91.1%). Individually, RNN was the best model with an accuracy of 87.5% and F-score of 83.5%, while RoBERTa had the best F-score of 73.1%. The study shows that deep learning is better for analyzing the sentiments within the text compared to supervised machine learning and provides a direction for future work and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Supercomputing
Journal of Supercomputing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.10%
发文量
734
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Supercomputing publishes papers on the technology, architecture and systems, algorithms, languages and programs, performance measures and methods, and applications of all aspects of Supercomputing. Tutorial and survey papers are intended for workers and students in the fields associated with and employing advanced computer systems. The journal also publishes letters to the editor, especially in areas relating to policy, succinct statements of paradoxes, intuitively puzzling results, partial results and real needs. Published theoretical and practical papers are advanced, in-depth treatments describing new developments and new ideas. Each includes an introduction summarizing prior, directly pertinent work that is useful for the reader to understand, in order to appreciate the advances being described.
期刊最新文献
Topic sentiment analysis based on deep neural network using document embedding technique. A Fechner multiscale local descriptor for face recognition. Data quality model for assessing public COVID-19 big datasets. BTDA: Two-factor dynamic identity authentication scheme for data trading based on alliance chain. Driving behavior analysis and classification by vehicle OBD data using machine learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1