Shaima Alothman, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Joseph LeMaster, John Thyfault, Jason Rucker, Patricia M Kluding
{"title":"久坐行为咨询干预老年2型糖尿病患者的可行性研究","authors":"Shaima Alothman, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Joseph LeMaster, John Thyfault, Jason Rucker, Patricia M Kluding","doi":"10.1177/11795514211040540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility and effect of sedentary behavior (SB) counseling on total sitting time (TST) and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Community-dwelling sedentary adults with T2D (n = 10; 8 women; age 65.6 ± 7.31) completed SB counseling (motivational interviewing-informed education about SB) aided by an activity monitor with a vibrotactile feature (activPAL3TM). The monitor was worn for 7 days, on weeks 1 and 13 (without the vibrotactile feature) and during weeks 5 and 9 (with the vibrotactile feature). Intervention feasibility was determined by study retention rates and activity monitor tolerability, and differences between pre- and post-intervention average daily TST. Paired <i>t</i>-test were performed. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen <i>d</i>. All participants attended all study sessions with only 20% reporting moderate issues tolerating the activity monitor. TST time decreased from 11.8 hours ± 1.76 at baseline to 10.29 hours ± 1.84 at 3 months' assessment (<i>P</i> < .05) with a large ES (Cohen <i>d</i> = .88). HbA1c was decreased by 0.51% (<i>P</i> < .05) at the end of the intervention. This study found that the intervention was feasible for sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"14 ","pages":"11795514211040540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/78/10.1177_11795514211040540.PMC8580491.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedentary Behavior Counseling Intervention in Aging People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shaima Alothman, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Joseph LeMaster, John Thyfault, Jason Rucker, Patricia M Kluding\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795514211040540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility and effect of sedentary behavior (SB) counseling on total sitting time (TST) and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Community-dwelling sedentary adults with T2D (n = 10; 8 women; age 65.6 ± 7.31) completed SB counseling (motivational interviewing-informed education about SB) aided by an activity monitor with a vibrotactile feature (activPAL3TM). The monitor was worn for 7 days, on weeks 1 and 13 (without the vibrotactile feature) and during weeks 5 and 9 (with the vibrotactile feature). Intervention feasibility was determined by study retention rates and activity monitor tolerability, and differences between pre- and post-intervention average daily TST. Paired <i>t</i>-test were performed. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen <i>d</i>. All participants attended all study sessions with only 20% reporting moderate issues tolerating the activity monitor. TST time decreased from 11.8 hours ± 1.76 at baseline to 10.29 hours ± 1.84 at 3 months' assessment (<i>P</i> < .05) with a large ES (Cohen <i>d</i> = .88). HbA1c was decreased by 0.51% (<i>P</i> < .05) at the end of the intervention. This study found that the intervention was feasible for sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"11795514211040540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/78/10.1177_11795514211040540.PMC8580491.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514211040540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514211040540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究旨在探讨久坐行为(SB)咨询对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者总坐时间(TST)和血糖控制的可行性和效果。居住在社区久坐的t2dm患者(n = 10;8妇女;年龄(65.6±7.31))在带振动触觉功能的活动监测仪(activPAL3TM)辅助下完成SB咨询(动机性访谈- SB教育)。在第1周和第13周(无振动触感特征)以及第5周和第9周(有振动触感特征)佩戴该监测仪7天。干预的可行性由研究保留率、活动监测仪耐受性以及干预前和干预后平均每日TST的差异来确定。进行配对t检验。效应量(ES)使用Cohen d计算。所有参与者参加了所有的研究会议,只有20%的人报告中度问题耐受活动监测器。TST时间由基线时的11.8小时±1.76缩短至3个月时的10.29小时±1.84 (P d = 0.88)。HbA1c降低0.51% (P
Sedentary Behavior Counseling Intervention in Aging People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Study.
This study examined the feasibility and effect of sedentary behavior (SB) counseling on total sitting time (TST) and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Community-dwelling sedentary adults with T2D (n = 10; 8 women; age 65.6 ± 7.31) completed SB counseling (motivational interviewing-informed education about SB) aided by an activity monitor with a vibrotactile feature (activPAL3TM). The monitor was worn for 7 days, on weeks 1 and 13 (without the vibrotactile feature) and during weeks 5 and 9 (with the vibrotactile feature). Intervention feasibility was determined by study retention rates and activity monitor tolerability, and differences between pre- and post-intervention average daily TST. Paired t-test were performed. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen d. All participants attended all study sessions with only 20% reporting moderate issues tolerating the activity monitor. TST time decreased from 11.8 hours ± 1.76 at baseline to 10.29 hours ± 1.84 at 3 months' assessment (P < .05) with a large ES (Cohen d = .88). HbA1c was decreased by 0.51% (P < .05) at the end of the intervention. This study found that the intervention was feasible for sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes.