Whitney J Smith, Michelle Y Martin, Maria Pisu, Robert A Oster, Haiyan Qu, Richard M Shewchuk, Mary E Sheffield, Alex Minter, Ana A Baumann, Laura Q Rogers
{"title":"促进农村地区的身体活动:有效性和潜在策略。","authors":"Whitney J Smith, Michelle Y Martin, Maria Pisu, Robert A Oster, Haiyan Qu, Richard M Shewchuk, Mary E Sheffield, Alex Minter, Ana A Baumann, Laura Q Rogers","doi":"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implementing efficacious physical activity interventions in real-world rural settings is needed because rural cancer survivors are more physically inactive and experience poorer health. To address this gap, this study evaluated effectiveness of an evidenced-based physical activity program (Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer [BEAT Cancer]) for rural women cancer survivors when implemented by community-based, non-research staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>16 rural women cancer survivors received BEAT Cancer implemented by a rural, community organization and non-research staff; physical activity, patient-reported outcomes, and social cognitive constructs were measured at baseline and post-program. Cancer survivors and interventionists completed program evaluations post-program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancer survivor mean age was 58±12 years; 62% were White. Mean months since diagnosis was 54±72; 69% had breast cancer. Significant improvements from pre- to post-program occurred for self-report weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (mean change [<i>M</i>] = 146±186, <i>p</i> = 0.009), anxiety (<i>M</i> = -1.3±1.8, <i>p</i> = 0.016), depression (<i>M</i> = -2.1±2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001), self-efficacy (<i>M</i> = 20.9±30.5, <i>p</i> = 0.019), barriers interference (<i>M</i> = -15.0±14.1, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and social support (<i>M</i> = 5.0±7.4, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Cancer survivors ranked the program highly, identified strategies that were helpful (e.g., group activities, personalized exercise plan, etc.), and suggested additional implementation strategies (e.g., guide for home-based phase, etc.). Interventionists identified strategies (e.g., logistics, staff training and certification, cost, etc.) for enhancing organizational readiness for program delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence-based physical activity programs can be effective when implemented by non-research staff in rural settings. Further research testing strategies that improve implementation is needed.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Effectiveness and identified strategies supporting delivery when implemented by a rural organization can improve physical activity promotion for rural, at-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580129/pdf/nihms-1729179.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Settings: Effectiveness and Potential Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Whitney J Smith, Michelle Y Martin, Maria Pisu, Robert A Oster, Haiyan Qu, Richard M Shewchuk, Mary E Sheffield, Alex Minter, Ana A Baumann, Laura Q Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/tjx.0000000000000180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implementing efficacious physical activity interventions in real-world rural settings is needed because rural cancer survivors are more physically inactive and experience poorer health. To address this gap, this study evaluated effectiveness of an evidenced-based physical activity program (Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer [BEAT Cancer]) for rural women cancer survivors when implemented by community-based, non-research staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>16 rural women cancer survivors received BEAT Cancer implemented by a rural, community organization and non-research staff; physical activity, patient-reported outcomes, and social cognitive constructs were measured at baseline and post-program. Cancer survivors and interventionists completed program evaluations post-program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cancer survivor mean age was 58±12 years; 62% were White. Mean months since diagnosis was 54±72; 69% had breast cancer. Significant improvements from pre- to post-program occurred for self-report weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (mean change [<i>M</i>] = 146±186, <i>p</i> = 0.009), anxiety (<i>M</i> = -1.3±1.8, <i>p</i> = 0.016), depression (<i>M</i> = -2.1±2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.001), self-efficacy (<i>M</i> = 20.9±30.5, <i>p</i> = 0.019), barriers interference (<i>M</i> = -15.0±14.1, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and social support (<i>M</i> = 5.0±7.4, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Cancer survivors ranked the program highly, identified strategies that were helpful (e.g., group activities, personalized exercise plan, etc.), and suggested additional implementation strategies (e.g., guide for home-based phase, etc.). Interventionists identified strategies (e.g., logistics, staff training and certification, cost, etc.) for enhancing organizational readiness for program delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence-based physical activity programs can be effective when implemented by non-research staff in rural settings. Further research testing strategies that improve implementation is needed.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Effectiveness and identified strategies supporting delivery when implemented by a rural organization can improve physical activity promotion for rural, at-risk populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580129/pdf/nihms-1729179.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Promoting Physical Activity in Rural Settings: Effectiveness and Potential Strategies.
Purpose: Implementing efficacious physical activity interventions in real-world rural settings is needed because rural cancer survivors are more physically inactive and experience poorer health. To address this gap, this study evaluated effectiveness of an evidenced-based physical activity program (Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer [BEAT Cancer]) for rural women cancer survivors when implemented by community-based, non-research staff.
Methods: 16 rural women cancer survivors received BEAT Cancer implemented by a rural, community organization and non-research staff; physical activity, patient-reported outcomes, and social cognitive constructs were measured at baseline and post-program. Cancer survivors and interventionists completed program evaluations post-program.
Results: Cancer survivor mean age was 58±12 years; 62% were White. Mean months since diagnosis was 54±72; 69% had breast cancer. Significant improvements from pre- to post-program occurred for self-report weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (mean change [M] = 146±186, p = 0.009), anxiety (M = -1.3±1.8, p = 0.016), depression (M = -2.1±2.0, p = 0.001), self-efficacy (M = 20.9±30.5, p = 0.019), barriers interference (M = -15.0±14.1, p = 0.001), and social support (M = 5.0±7.4, p = 0.02). Cancer survivors ranked the program highly, identified strategies that were helpful (e.g., group activities, personalized exercise plan, etc.), and suggested additional implementation strategies (e.g., guide for home-based phase, etc.). Interventionists identified strategies (e.g., logistics, staff training and certification, cost, etc.) for enhancing organizational readiness for program delivery.
Conclusion: Evidence-based physical activity programs can be effective when implemented by non-research staff in rural settings. Further research testing strategies that improve implementation is needed.
Practical implications: Effectiveness and identified strategies supporting delivery when implemented by a rural organization can improve physical activity promotion for rural, at-risk populations.