用iPad筛查澳大利亚农村青光眼视野缺陷。

Mark A Chia, Edward Trang, Ashish Agar, Algis J Vingrys, Jenny Hepschke, George Yx Kong, Angus W Turner
{"title":"用iPad筛查澳大利亚农村青光眼视野缺陷。","authors":"Mark A Chia,&nbsp;Edward Trang,&nbsp;Ashish Agar,&nbsp;Algis J Vingrys,&nbsp;Jenny Hepschke,&nbsp;George Yx Kong,&nbsp;Angus W Turner","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>Developing improved methods for early detection of visual field defects is pivotal to reducing glaucoma-related vision loss. The Melbourne Rapid Fields screening module (MRF-S) is an iPad-based test, which allows suprathreshold screening with zone-based analysis to rapidly assess the risk of manifest glaucoma. The versatility of MRF-S has potential utility in rural areas and during infectious pandemics. This study evaluates the utility of MRF-S for detecting field defects in non-metropolitan settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional validation study. Two hundred and fifty-two eyes of 142 participants were recruited from rural sites through two outreach eye services in Australia. Participants were tested using MRF-S and compared with a reference standard; either Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyzer or Haag-Streit Octopus performed at the same visit. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess user acceptability. Major outcome measures were the area under the curve (AUC) for detecting mild and moderate field defects defined by the reference tests, along with corresponding performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean test duration for MRF-S was 1.88 minutes compared with 5.92 minutes for reference tests. The AUCs for mild and moderate field defects were 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.87] and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92), respectively, indicating very good diagnostic accuracy. Using a risk criterion of 55%, MRF-S identified moderate field defects with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.4 and 81.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical significance: </strong>The MRF-S iPad module can identify patients with mild and moderate field defects while delivering favorable user acceptability and short test duration. This has potential application within rural locations and amidst infectious pandemics.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, <i>et al.</i> Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021;15(3):125-131.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/94/jocgp-15-125.PMC8807937.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad.\",\"authors\":\"Mark A Chia,&nbsp;Edward Trang,&nbsp;Ashish Agar,&nbsp;Algis J Vingrys,&nbsp;Jenny Hepschke,&nbsp;George Yx Kong,&nbsp;Angus W Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>Developing improved methods for early detection of visual field defects is pivotal to reducing glaucoma-related vision loss. The Melbourne Rapid Fields screening module (MRF-S) is an iPad-based test, which allows suprathreshold screening with zone-based analysis to rapidly assess the risk of manifest glaucoma. The versatility of MRF-S has potential utility in rural areas and during infectious pandemics. This study evaluates the utility of MRF-S for detecting field defects in non-metropolitan settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional validation study. Two hundred and fifty-two eyes of 142 participants were recruited from rural sites through two outreach eye services in Australia. Participants were tested using MRF-S and compared with a reference standard; either Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyzer or Haag-Streit Octopus performed at the same visit. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess user acceptability. Major outcome measures were the area under the curve (AUC) for detecting mild and moderate field defects defined by the reference tests, along with corresponding performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean test duration for MRF-S was 1.88 minutes compared with 5.92 minutes for reference tests. The AUCs for mild and moderate field defects were 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.87] and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92), respectively, indicating very good diagnostic accuracy. Using a risk criterion of 55%, MRF-S identified moderate field defects with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.4 and 81.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical significance: </strong>The MRF-S iPad module can identify patients with mild and moderate field defects while delivering favorable user acceptability and short test duration. This has potential application within rural locations and amidst infectious pandemics.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, <i>et al.</i> Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021;15(3):125-131.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/94/jocgp-15-125.PMC8807937.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的与目的:发展改进的早期视野缺损检测方法是减少青光眼相关性视力丧失的关键。墨尔本快速场筛查模块(MRF-S)是一种基于ipad的测试,它允许超阈值筛查和基于区域的分析,以快速评估明显青光眼的风险。MRF-S的多功能性在农村地区和传染性大流行期间具有潜在的效用。本研究评估了MRF-S在非大都市环境中检测磁场缺陷的效用。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、横断面验证研究。通过澳大利亚的两家外联眼科服务机构,从农村地区招募了142名参与者的252只眼睛。参与者使用磁共振成像进行测试,并与参考标准进行比较;蔡司Humphrey野外分析仪或Haag-Streit章鱼在同一次访问中进行。使用标准化问卷来评估用户的接受程度。主要的结果测量指标是用于检测参考试验定义的轻度和中度野外缺陷的曲线下面积(AUC),以及相应的性能特征(灵敏度、特异性)。结果:MRF-S的平均测试时间为1.88分钟,而参考测试的平均测试时间为5.92分钟。轻度和中度视野缺陷的auc分别为0.81[95%置信区间(CI): 0.75-0.87]和0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92),表明非常好的诊断准确性。采用55%的风险标准,MRF-S识别中度磁场缺陷的敏感性和特异性分别为88.4和81.0%。结论及临床意义:MRF-S iPad模块可以识别轻度和中度视野缺陷患者,且用户接受度好,测试时间短。这在农村地区和传染病流行期间具有潜在的应用前景。本文引用方式:Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, et al。用iPad筛查澳大利亚农村青光眼视野缺陷。中华实用青光眼杂志;2013;31(3):391 - 391。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad.

Aim and objective: Developing improved methods for early detection of visual field defects is pivotal to reducing glaucoma-related vision loss. The Melbourne Rapid Fields screening module (MRF-S) is an iPad-based test, which allows suprathreshold screening with zone-based analysis to rapidly assess the risk of manifest glaucoma. The versatility of MRF-S has potential utility in rural areas and during infectious pandemics. This study evaluates the utility of MRF-S for detecting field defects in non-metropolitan settings.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional validation study. Two hundred and fifty-two eyes of 142 participants were recruited from rural sites through two outreach eye services in Australia. Participants were tested using MRF-S and compared with a reference standard; either Zeiss Humphrey Field Analyzer or Haag-Streit Octopus performed at the same visit. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess user acceptability. Major outcome measures were the area under the curve (AUC) for detecting mild and moderate field defects defined by the reference tests, along with corresponding performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity).

Results: The mean test duration for MRF-S was 1.88 minutes compared with 5.92 minutes for reference tests. The AUCs for mild and moderate field defects were 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.87] and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92), respectively, indicating very good diagnostic accuracy. Using a risk criterion of 55%, MRF-S identified moderate field defects with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.4 and 81.0%, respectively.

Conclusion and clinical significance: The MRF-S iPad module can identify patients with mild and moderate field defects while delivering favorable user acceptability and short test duration. This has potential application within rural locations and amidst infectious pandemics.

How to cite this article: Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, et al. Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021;15(3):125-131.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Review of Canaloplasty in the Treatment and Management of Glaucoma Effect of Sleeping Position on the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Individuals with Glaucoma The Metabolic Shift: Unraveling the Potential of the Ketogenic Diet in Glaucoma Management Bilateral Chandler Syndrome, Nanophthalmos, and Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Complex Presentation, Challenging Diagnosis, and Pathological Insight—A Case Report Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1