肯尼亚的“假论文”作者及其对知识生产中阴影假设的启示。

Journal of African cultural studies, 2020- Pub Date : 2021-09-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13696815.2021.1952405
Patricia Kingori
{"title":"肯尼亚的“假论文”作者及其对知识生产中阴影假设的启示。","authors":"Patricia Kingori","doi":"10.1080/13696815.2021.1952405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this contribution to the special issue on Fakery in Africa, I examine the booming \"fake essay\" industry and draw on the role and perspectives increasingly occupied by of tens of thousands of young and highly-educated Kenyans. These so-called \"Shadow Scholars\" are part of a vast global online marketplace, an invisible knowledge production economy, where students and academics in the global North solicit and pay for their services in exchange for confidential and plagiarism-free essays, theses, dissertations, qualifications and publications. This article centres on descriptions of these writers as \"shadows\" as a means of complicating not only the most popular description of Africa in the global imagination - as existing in the shadow of an infinite number of different entities - but to challenge the notion of the shadow in relation to African knowledge production as being fake. It pays attention to the Kenyan writers' protestations that their knowledge, experiences and labour are all real and that analogies with shadows reduce them and the impact of their work to something that is non-existent and not alive. From their perspective the term shadow is pejorative because it further reduces the intellectual contribution of Africans, presenting them as derivative.</p>","PeriodicalId":73587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African cultural studies, 2020-","volume":"33 3","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596499/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kenya's \\\"Fake Essay\\\" Writers and the Light they Shine on Assumptions of Shadows in Knowledge Production.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Kingori\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696815.2021.1952405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this contribution to the special issue on Fakery in Africa, I examine the booming \\\"fake essay\\\" industry and draw on the role and perspectives increasingly occupied by of tens of thousands of young and highly-educated Kenyans. These so-called \\\"Shadow Scholars\\\" are part of a vast global online marketplace, an invisible knowledge production economy, where students and academics in the global North solicit and pay for their services in exchange for confidential and plagiarism-free essays, theses, dissertations, qualifications and publications. This article centres on descriptions of these writers as \\\"shadows\\\" as a means of complicating not only the most popular description of Africa in the global imagination - as existing in the shadow of an infinite number of different entities - but to challenge the notion of the shadow in relation to African knowledge production as being fake. It pays attention to the Kenyan writers' protestations that their knowledge, experiences and labour are all real and that analogies with shadows reduce them and the impact of their work to something that is non-existent and not alive. From their perspective the term shadow is pejorative because it further reduces the intellectual contribution of Africans, presenting them as derivative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African cultural studies, 2020-\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"297-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8596499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African cultural studies, 2020-\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2021.1952405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African cultural studies, 2020-","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2021.1952405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇关于非洲造假的特刊中,我研究了蓬勃发展的“假论文”行业,并借鉴了成千上万受过高等教育的肯尼亚年轻人日益占据的角色和观点。这些所谓的“影子学者”是一个庞大的全球在线市场的一部分,这是一个无形的知识生产经济,全球北方的学生和学者在这里征求他们的服务并支付费用,以换取保密和无抄袭的论文、论文、学位论文、资格证书和出版物。这篇文章集中在把这些作家描述为“影子”,作为一种手段,不仅使全球想象中对非洲最流行的描述——存在于无数不同实体的阴影中——变得复杂,而且挑战了与非洲知识生产有关的阴影概念是虚假的。它关注肯尼亚作家的抗议,他们的知识,经验和劳动都是真实的,与阴影的类比减少了他们和他们工作的影响,使其成为不存在的东西。从他们的角度来看,“影子”一词带有贬义,因为它进一步降低了非洲人的智力贡献,将他们视为衍生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kenya's "Fake Essay" Writers and the Light they Shine on Assumptions of Shadows in Knowledge Production.

In this contribution to the special issue on Fakery in Africa, I examine the booming "fake essay" industry and draw on the role and perspectives increasingly occupied by of tens of thousands of young and highly-educated Kenyans. These so-called "Shadow Scholars" are part of a vast global online marketplace, an invisible knowledge production economy, where students and academics in the global North solicit and pay for their services in exchange for confidential and plagiarism-free essays, theses, dissertations, qualifications and publications. This article centres on descriptions of these writers as "shadows" as a means of complicating not only the most popular description of Africa in the global imagination - as existing in the shadow of an infinite number of different entities - but to challenge the notion of the shadow in relation to African knowledge production as being fake. It pays attention to the Kenyan writers' protestations that their knowledge, experiences and labour are all real and that analogies with shadows reduce them and the impact of their work to something that is non-existent and not alive. From their perspective the term shadow is pejorative because it further reduces the intellectual contribution of Africans, presenting them as derivative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Fakes Exist? Trade and Consumption of Sex Enhancers in Harare's Avenues. Kenya's "Fake Essay" Writers and the Light they Shine on Assumptions of Shadows in Knowledge Production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1