人类进化的技术条件:作为基础科学的石器研究

IF 1.8 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of paleolithic archaeology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1
Shumon Tobias Hussain, Marie Soressi
{"title":"人类进化的技术条件:作为基础科学的石器研究","authors":"Shumon Tobias Hussain, Marie Soressi","doi":"10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent elaboration and rapid expansion of aDNA, paleoproteomics, and related fields have propelled a profound \"biomolecular turn\" in archaeology and fundamentally changed the topology of archaeological knowledge production. Such a transformation of the archaeological research landscape is not without consequence for long-standing research practices in the field, such as lithic analysis. This special issue derives from the session <i>Old Stones, New Eyes?</i> organized by the authors at the UISPP World Congress in Paris in 2018, which aimed to explore the future of lithic studies. An underlying theme of our session was the felt need to respond to the increasing marginalization of lithic research in terms of its capacity to (1) contribute to the grand narratives of early human evolution and (2) better articulate the role and significance of lithic studies in interdisciplinary human origins research. In this editorial, we briefly outline some of the questions and challenges raised by the biomolecular turn and advocate for a more self-conscious and reflexive stance among lithic experts. We argue that lithic studies fulfill all necessary requirements to act as a basic science for human origins research and that its role and status depends less on technological advances, such as, e.g., improved computing facilities, novel analytical software, or automated shape capture technologies, than on continuous work on the conceptual and methodological foundations of inquiry. We finally draw attention to the unique capability of lithic studies to shed light on the human technological condition and illustrate this potential by introducing and briefly discussing the papers included in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":73885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","volume":"4 3","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Technological Condition of Human Evolution: Lithic Studies as Basic Science.\",\"authors\":\"Shumon Tobias Hussain, Marie Soressi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent elaboration and rapid expansion of aDNA, paleoproteomics, and related fields have propelled a profound \\\"biomolecular turn\\\" in archaeology and fundamentally changed the topology of archaeological knowledge production. Such a transformation of the archaeological research landscape is not without consequence for long-standing research practices in the field, such as lithic analysis. This special issue derives from the session <i>Old Stones, New Eyes?</i> organized by the authors at the UISPP World Congress in Paris in 2018, which aimed to explore the future of lithic studies. An underlying theme of our session was the felt need to respond to the increasing marginalization of lithic research in terms of its capacity to (1) contribute to the grand narratives of early human evolution and (2) better articulate the role and significance of lithic studies in interdisciplinary human origins research. In this editorial, we briefly outline some of the questions and challenges raised by the biomolecular turn and advocate for a more self-conscious and reflexive stance among lithic experts. We argue that lithic studies fulfill all necessary requirements to act as a basic science for human origins research and that its role and status depends less on technological advances, such as, e.g., improved computing facilities, novel analytical software, or automated shape capture technologies, than on continuous work on the conceptual and methodological foundations of inquiry. We finally draw attention to the unique capability of lithic studies to shed light on the human technological condition and illustrate this potential by introducing and briefly discussing the papers included in this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of paleolithic archaeology\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of paleolithic archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-021-00098-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近来,aDNA、古蛋白组学及相关领域的发展和迅速壮大,推动了考古学领域深刻的 "生物分子转向",从根本上改变了考古学知识生产的拓扑结构。考古学研究领域的这种转变对该领域的长期研究实践(如石器分析)不无影响。本特刊源于作者在 2018 年巴黎国际石制品学会世界大会(UISPP World Congress)上组织的 "旧石器,新视野?"分会,旨在探讨石器研究的未来。我们会议的一个基本主题是,我们认为有必要对石器研究日益边缘化的问题做出回应,因为石器研究有能力:(1)为早期人类进化的宏大叙事做出贡献;(2)更好地阐明石器研究在跨学科人类起源研究中的作用和意义。在这篇社论中,我们简要概述了生物分子转向所提出的一些问题和挑战,并倡导石器专家采取更加自觉和自省的立场。我们认为,石器研究满足了作为人类起源研究基础科学的所有必要条件,其作用和地位与其说取决于技术进步,如改进计算设施、新型分析软件或自动形状捕捉技术,不如说取决于在研究的概念和方法论基础上的持续努力。最后,我们提请大家注意石器研究在揭示人类技术状况方面的独特能力,并通过介绍和简要讨论本期收录的论文来说明这种潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Technological Condition of Human Evolution: Lithic Studies as Basic Science.

The recent elaboration and rapid expansion of aDNA, paleoproteomics, and related fields have propelled a profound "biomolecular turn" in archaeology and fundamentally changed the topology of archaeological knowledge production. Such a transformation of the archaeological research landscape is not without consequence for long-standing research practices in the field, such as lithic analysis. This special issue derives from the session Old Stones, New Eyes? organized by the authors at the UISPP World Congress in Paris in 2018, which aimed to explore the future of lithic studies. An underlying theme of our session was the felt need to respond to the increasing marginalization of lithic research in terms of its capacity to (1) contribute to the grand narratives of early human evolution and (2) better articulate the role and significance of lithic studies in interdisciplinary human origins research. In this editorial, we briefly outline some of the questions and challenges raised by the biomolecular turn and advocate for a more self-conscious and reflexive stance among lithic experts. We argue that lithic studies fulfill all necessary requirements to act as a basic science for human origins research and that its role and status depends less on technological advances, such as, e.g., improved computing facilities, novel analytical software, or automated shape capture technologies, than on continuous work on the conceptual and methodological foundations of inquiry. We finally draw attention to the unique capability of lithic studies to shed light on the human technological condition and illustrate this potential by introducing and briefly discussing the papers included in this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Us and Them: How to Reconcile Archaeological and Biological Data at the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic Transition in Europe? Cultural Dynamics in the Levantine Upper Paleolithic, ca. 40-33 ky BP: Insights Based on Recent Advances in the Study of the Levantine Aurignacian, the Arkov-Divshon, and the Atlitian. Seasonality and Lithic Investment in the Oldowan The Scraper Planes from Leopard Cave, Erongo Mountains, Namibia Variation in Use of East Asian Late Paleolithic Weapons: a Study of Tip Cross-sectional Area of Stemmed Points from Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1