改善乳腺癌的初步咨询。

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00047
Veronica B Decker, Olga Ivanov, Priya K Gopalan
{"title":"改善乳腺癌的初步咨询。","authors":"Veronica B Decker,&nbsp;Olga Ivanov,&nbsp;Priya K Gopalan","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research shows providing cancer patients with adequate information has many benefits, but how do nurse practitioners know whether the initial consultation meets the information needs of their patients? Furthermore, how can the initial consultation be improved?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A low-cost continuous quality improvement process centered on decreasing distress and increasing information satisfaction was piloted to determine its effectiveness and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immediately before and after an initial consultation with a breast cancer surgeon, 59 women completed a questionnaire to measure distress and specific problems they were having. They then completed a questionnaire to measure information satisfaction. Pre-post changes in the distress score and number of problems were analyzed, as was information satisfaction. Feasibility was qualitatively examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the study sample, pre-post median distress scores decreased significantly (from 5 to 3, Chi-square = 5.73, <i>p</i> < .017). Information dissatisfaction scales were identified. The process was deemed feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This effective and feasible process may help the nurse practitioner continuously improve the initial consultation process.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>(a) the initial breast cancer consultation is important, (b) a novel process for improving the initial breast cancer consultation is proposed, and (c) this feasible, low-cost process should be embedded into normal practice operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"225-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Initial Breast Cancer Consultation.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica B Decker,&nbsp;Olga Ivanov,&nbsp;Priya K Gopalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research shows providing cancer patients with adequate information has many benefits, but how do nurse practitioners know whether the initial consultation meets the information needs of their patients? Furthermore, how can the initial consultation be improved?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A low-cost continuous quality improvement process centered on decreasing distress and increasing information satisfaction was piloted to determine its effectiveness and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immediately before and after an initial consultation with a breast cancer surgeon, 59 women completed a questionnaire to measure distress and specific problems they were having. They then completed a questionnaire to measure information satisfaction. Pre-post changes in the distress score and number of problems were analyzed, as was information satisfaction. Feasibility was qualitatively examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the study sample, pre-post median distress scores decreased significantly (from 5 to 3, Chi-square = 5.73, <i>p</i> < .017). Information dissatisfaction scales were identified. The process was deemed feasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This effective and feasible process may help the nurse practitioner continuously improve the initial consultation process.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>(a) the initial breast cancer consultation is important, (b) a novel process for improving the initial breast cancer consultation is proposed, and (c) this feasible, low-cost process should be embedded into normal practice operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"225-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明为癌症患者提供足够的信息有很多好处,但是执业护士如何知道最初的咨询是否满足患者的信息需求?此外,如何改进初始咨询?目的:对一种以减少苦恼和提高信息满意度为中心的低成本持续质量改进流程进行试点,以确定其有效性和可行性。方法:在与乳腺癌外科医生初次会诊之前和之后,59名妇女完成了一份调查问卷,以测量她们的痛苦和具体问题。然后,他们完成了一份测量信息满意度的问卷。分析了焦虑得分和问题数量的前后变化,以及信息满意度。对可行性进行了定性检验。结果:对于研究样本,前后中位痛苦得分显著下降(从5降至3,卡方= 5.73,p < 0.017)。确定了信息不满意量表。这一过程被认为是可行的。结论:该流程有效可行,可帮助执业护士持续改进初诊流程。对护理的启示:(a)乳腺癌初始会诊是重要的,(b)提出了一种改进乳腺癌初始会诊的新流程,(c)这种可行的、低成本的流程应该嵌入到正常的实践操作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Initial Breast Cancer Consultation.

Background: Research shows providing cancer patients with adequate information has many benefits, but how do nurse practitioners know whether the initial consultation meets the information needs of their patients? Furthermore, how can the initial consultation be improved?

Objective: A low-cost continuous quality improvement process centered on decreasing distress and increasing information satisfaction was piloted to determine its effectiveness and feasibility.

Methods: Immediately before and after an initial consultation with a breast cancer surgeon, 59 women completed a questionnaire to measure distress and specific problems they were having. They then completed a questionnaire to measure information satisfaction. Pre-post changes in the distress score and number of problems were analyzed, as was information satisfaction. Feasibility was qualitatively examined.

Results: For the study sample, pre-post median distress scores decreased significantly (from 5 to 3, Chi-square = 5.73, p < .017). Information dissatisfaction scales were identified. The process was deemed feasible.

Conclusions: This effective and feasible process may help the nurse practitioner continuously improve the initial consultation process.

Implications for nursing: (a) the initial breast cancer consultation is important, (b) a novel process for improving the initial breast cancer consultation is proposed, and (c) this feasible, low-cost process should be embedded into normal practice operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1