Allen A Mehr, Caroline Elmer-Lyon, Erin Maetzold, Catherine S Bradley, Joseph T Kowalski
{"title":"增强恢复方案对盆腔器官脱垂手术中阿片类药物使用的影响。","authors":"Allen A Mehr, Caroline Elmer-Lyon, Erin Maetzold, Catherine S Bradley, Joseph T Kowalski","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary objective was to compare the total opioid use by patients undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants of this ambispective cohort study included a \"pre-ERP\" retrospective cohort and an \"ERP\" cohort of patients prospectively enrolled after the full implementation of the ERP in January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic record. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables. Total opioid use was calculated for each participant using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between cohorts using the Student t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants (n = 65) were similar between cohorts and had a mean (SD) age of 62.4 (9.7) years and body mass index of 28.9 (4.8), and had a median parity of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Comorbid conditions, assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were also similar, with a mean (SD) of 2 (2.9). Hysterectomy approach and apical procedures did not differ between groups. After ERP implementation, mean (SD) intraoperative and postoperative MMEs decreased significantly (59.4 [31.6] vs 36.9 [20.5], P < 0.01). Total MMEs prescribed at discharge also decreased (392.3 [88.4] vs 94.6 [61.3], P < 0.01). Total anesthesia time and surgical time were similar, whereas mean total admission time decreased (27.3 [10.8] vs 18 [8.6] hours, P < 0.01). Telephone calls within 30 days increased from mean 1 (1.0) to 2.2 (1.9) (P < 0.01), whereas clinic visits and 30-day readmissions did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery at an academic medical center received significantly fewer opioids after implementation of an ERP without a change in postoperative pain scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 12","pages":"e705-e709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900056/pdf/nihms-1782839.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Opioid Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Allen A Mehr, Caroline Elmer-Lyon, Erin Maetzold, Catherine S Bradley, Joseph T Kowalski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our primary objective was to compare the total opioid use by patients undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants of this ambispective cohort study included a \\\"pre-ERP\\\" retrospective cohort and an \\\"ERP\\\" cohort of patients prospectively enrolled after the full implementation of the ERP in January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic record. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables. Total opioid use was calculated for each participant using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between cohorts using the Student t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants (n = 65) were similar between cohorts and had a mean (SD) age of 62.4 (9.7) years and body mass index of 28.9 (4.8), and had a median parity of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Comorbid conditions, assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were also similar, with a mean (SD) of 2 (2.9). Hysterectomy approach and apical procedures did not differ between groups. After ERP implementation, mean (SD) intraoperative and postoperative MMEs decreased significantly (59.4 [31.6] vs 36.9 [20.5], P < 0.01). Total MMEs prescribed at discharge also decreased (392.3 [88.4] vs 94.6 [61.3], P < 0.01). Total anesthesia time and surgical time were similar, whereas mean total admission time decreased (27.3 [10.8] vs 18 [8.6] hours, P < 0.01). Telephone calls within 30 days increased from mean 1 (1.0) to 2.2 (1.9) (P < 0.01), whereas clinic visits and 30-day readmissions did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery at an academic medical center received significantly fewer opioids after implementation of an ERP without a change in postoperative pain scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"e705-e709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900056/pdf/nihms-1782839.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Opioid Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Objectives: Our primary objective was to compare the total opioid use by patients undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP).
Methods: Participants of this ambispective cohort study included a "pre-ERP" retrospective cohort and an "ERP" cohort of patients prospectively enrolled after the full implementation of the ERP in January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic record. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables. Total opioid use was calculated for each participant using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between cohorts using the Student t test.
Results: Study participants (n = 65) were similar between cohorts and had a mean (SD) age of 62.4 (9.7) years and body mass index of 28.9 (4.8), and had a median parity of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Comorbid conditions, assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were also similar, with a mean (SD) of 2 (2.9). Hysterectomy approach and apical procedures did not differ between groups. After ERP implementation, mean (SD) intraoperative and postoperative MMEs decreased significantly (59.4 [31.6] vs 36.9 [20.5], P < 0.01). Total MMEs prescribed at discharge also decreased (392.3 [88.4] vs 94.6 [61.3], P < 0.01). Total anesthesia time and surgical time were similar, whereas mean total admission time decreased (27.3 [10.8] vs 18 [8.6] hours, P < 0.01). Telephone calls within 30 days increased from mean 1 (1.0) to 2.2 (1.9) (P < 0.01), whereas clinic visits and 30-day readmissions did not differ.
Conclusions: Women undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery at an academic medical center received significantly fewer opioids after implementation of an ERP without a change in postoperative pain scores.
期刊介绍:
Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.