伊朗重症护士对安乐死的态度:一项多中心横断面研究。

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389
Amir Emami Zeydi, Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari, Olive Fast, Saman Maroufizadeh, Keyvan Heydari, Mohammad Hashem Gholampour, Samad Karkhah
{"title":"伊朗重症护士对安乐死的态度:一项多中心横断面研究。","authors":"Amir Emami Zeydi,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari,&nbsp;Olive Fast,&nbsp;Saman Maroufizadeh,&nbsp;Keyvan Heydari,&nbsp;Mohammad Hashem Gholampour,&nbsp;Samad Karkhah","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today, one of the major ethical challenges facing the world's health care system, and in particular nurses in the intensive care unit, is euthanasia or death out of pity. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude of Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit toward euthanasia. This was an analytical cross-sectional study using census sampling. The data collection tool was the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. A total of 206 nurses working in the intensive care unit in 4 hospitals in the Mazandaran province of Iran were included in this study. The mean of total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score in intensive care unit nurses was 2.96. The mean euthanasia dimensions were ethical consideration, practical considerations, treasuring life, and naturalistic beliefs, 3.03, 2.92, 2.98, and 2.99, respectively. There was significant but low negative correlation between age and total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score, ethical considerations, and practical considerations. Male nurses exhibited significantly higher Euthanasia Attitude Scale scores, specifically in regard to ethical and practical considerations compared with female nurses. The most Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit had a negative attitude toward euthanasia for patients in the later stages of the disease. However, this opposition was less than similar studies in Iran in the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Attitude of Iranian Critical Care Nurses Toward Euthanasia: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Emami Zeydi,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari,&nbsp;Olive Fast,&nbsp;Saman Maroufizadeh,&nbsp;Keyvan Heydari,&nbsp;Mohammad Hashem Gholampour,&nbsp;Samad Karkhah\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Today, one of the major ethical challenges facing the world's health care system, and in particular nurses in the intensive care unit, is euthanasia or death out of pity. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude of Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit toward euthanasia. This was an analytical cross-sectional study using census sampling. The data collection tool was the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. A total of 206 nurses working in the intensive care unit in 4 hospitals in the Mazandaran province of Iran were included in this study. The mean of total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score in intensive care unit nurses was 2.96. The mean euthanasia dimensions were ethical consideration, practical considerations, treasuring life, and naturalistic beliefs, 3.03, 2.92, 2.98, and 2.99, respectively. There was significant but low negative correlation between age and total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score, ethical considerations, and practical considerations. Male nurses exhibited significantly higher Euthanasia Attitude Scale scores, specifically in regard to ethical and practical considerations compared with female nurses. The most Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit had a negative attitude toward euthanasia for patients in the later stages of the disease. However, this opposition was less than similar studies in Iran in the past.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

今天,世界卫生保健系统,特别是重症监护病房的护士面临的主要道德挑战之一是安乐死或因怜悯而死亡。本研究的目的是调查伊朗重症监护病房护士对安乐死的态度。这是一项采用人口普查抽样的分析性横断面研究。数据收集工具为安乐死态度量表。在伊朗马赞达兰省4家医院的重症监护室工作的206名护士被纳入本研究。重症监护病房护士安乐死态度量表总得分均值为2.96分。安乐死的平均维度分别为伦理考虑、实际考虑、珍惜生命和自然主义信仰,分别为3.03、2.92、2.98和2.99。年龄与安乐死态度量表总得分、伦理考虑和实际考虑之间存在显著但低的负相关。男护士在安乐死态度量表上的得分明显高于女护士,特别是在道德和实际考虑方面。重症监护病房的大多数伊朗护士对晚期患者的安乐死持否定态度。然而,这种反对意见比过去在伊朗进行的类似研究要少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Attitude of Iranian Critical Care Nurses Toward Euthanasia: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.

Today, one of the major ethical challenges facing the world's health care system, and in particular nurses in the intensive care unit, is euthanasia or death out of pity. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitude of Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit toward euthanasia. This was an analytical cross-sectional study using census sampling. The data collection tool was the Euthanasia Attitude Scale. A total of 206 nurses working in the intensive care unit in 4 hospitals in the Mazandaran province of Iran were included in this study. The mean of total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score in intensive care unit nurses was 2.96. The mean euthanasia dimensions were ethical consideration, practical considerations, treasuring life, and naturalistic beliefs, 3.03, 2.92, 2.98, and 2.99, respectively. There was significant but low negative correlation between age and total Euthanasia Attitude Scale score, ethical considerations, and practical considerations. Male nurses exhibited significantly higher Euthanasia Attitude Scale scores, specifically in regard to ethical and practical considerations compared with female nurses. The most Iranian nurses in the intensive care unit had a negative attitude toward euthanasia for patients in the later stages of the disease. However, this opposition was less than similar studies in Iran in the past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Care Bundle Approach for Oral Health Maintenance and Reduction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Cryoanalgesia for Reducing Unconscious Patients' Pain During Arterial Puncture. Developing and Validating a Bundle for Safe Intra-Hospital Transporting of the Critically Ill Patients: Mixed Qualitative Design With Delphi Approach. Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1