实时超声测量视神经鞘直径的可靠性。

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s13089-021-00255-1
Jason B Jennings, Cynthia Oliva, Michael Joyce, Michael J Vitto, Jordan Tozer, Lindsay A Taylor, David P Evans
{"title":"实时超声测量视神经鞘直径的可靠性。","authors":"Jason B Jennings,&nbsp;Cynthia Oliva,&nbsp;Michael Joyce,&nbsp;Michael J Vitto,&nbsp;Jordan Tozer,&nbsp;Lindsay A Taylor,&nbsp;David P Evans","doi":"10.1186/s13089-021-00255-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a rapid, non-invasive means to indirectly assess intracranial pressure. Previous research has demonstrated the ability of emergency physicians to measure ONSD accurately with bedside ultrasound when compared to CT scan or MRI, however the reliability of this measurement between two or more operators has been called into question (Hassen et al. in J Emerg Med 48:450-457, 2015; Shirodkar et al. in Ind J Crit Care Med 19:466-470, 2015). Given the need for accurate and precise measurement to use this as a screening exam, we sought to determine the inter-rater reliability between ONSD measurements obtained in real time by fellowship-trained emergency ultrasound physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians measured bilateral ONSD of 10 healthy volunteers using a high-frequency linear transducer. The physicians were blinded to the other scanners' measurements, and no instructions were given other than to obtain the ONSD. Each sonographer measured the ONSD in real time and it was recorded by a research coordinator. All measurements were recorded in millimeters. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to estimate the inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 measurements of ONSD were obtained. The average measurement was 4.3 mm (3.83-4.77). Very little variation was found between the three physicians, with a calculated ICC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONSD measurement obtained by ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency medicine physicians is a reliable measurement with a high degree of correlation between scanners.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":" ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748557/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-rater reliability of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using real-time ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Jason B Jennings,&nbsp;Cynthia Oliva,&nbsp;Michael Joyce,&nbsp;Michael J Vitto,&nbsp;Jordan Tozer,&nbsp;Lindsay A Taylor,&nbsp;David P Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13089-021-00255-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a rapid, non-invasive means to indirectly assess intracranial pressure. Previous research has demonstrated the ability of emergency physicians to measure ONSD accurately with bedside ultrasound when compared to CT scan or MRI, however the reliability of this measurement between two or more operators has been called into question (Hassen et al. in J Emerg Med 48:450-457, 2015; Shirodkar et al. in Ind J Crit Care Med 19:466-470, 2015). Given the need for accurate and precise measurement to use this as a screening exam, we sought to determine the inter-rater reliability between ONSD measurements obtained in real time by fellowship-trained emergency ultrasound physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians measured bilateral ONSD of 10 healthy volunteers using a high-frequency linear transducer. The physicians were blinded to the other scanners' measurements, and no instructions were given other than to obtain the ONSD. Each sonographer measured the ONSD in real time and it was recorded by a research coordinator. All measurements were recorded in millimeters. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to estimate the inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 measurements of ONSD were obtained. The average measurement was 4.3 mm (3.83-4.77). Very little variation was found between the three physicians, with a calculated ICC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONSD measurement obtained by ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency medicine physicians is a reliable measurement with a high degree of correlation between scanners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00255-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00255-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:超声测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是一种快速、无创的间接评估颅内压的方法。先前的研究表明,与CT扫描或MRI相比,急诊医生使用床边超声准确测量ONSD的能力,然而,两个或更多操作员之间测量的可靠性受到质疑(Hassen等人,J Emerg Med 48:450-457, 2015;Shirodkar et al. journal of clinical nursing, 2015)。考虑到需要准确和精确的测量来作为筛查检查,我们试图确定由研究人员培训的急诊超声医生实时获得的ONSD测量值之间的可靠性。方法:三名超声研究员培训的急诊医师使用高频线性换能器测量10名健康志愿者的双侧ONSD。医生对其他扫描仪的测量结果一无所知,除了获取ONSD外,没有任何指示。每位超声医师实时测量ONSD,并由研究协调员记录。所有测量都以毫米为单位记录。计算组内相关系数(ICCs)来估计组间信度。结果:共测得ONSD 60次。平均测量4.3 mm(3.83 ~ 4.77)。三位医生之间的差异很小,计算出的ICC为0.82(95%可信区间为0.63-0.92)。结论:由超声研究员培训的急诊医师获得的ONSD测量值是一种可靠的测量值,扫描仪之间具有高度相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-rater reliability of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using real-time ultrasonography.

Objectives: Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a rapid, non-invasive means to indirectly assess intracranial pressure. Previous research has demonstrated the ability of emergency physicians to measure ONSD accurately with bedside ultrasound when compared to CT scan or MRI, however the reliability of this measurement between two or more operators has been called into question (Hassen et al. in J Emerg Med 48:450-457, 2015; Shirodkar et al. in Ind J Crit Care Med 19:466-470, 2015). Given the need for accurate and precise measurement to use this as a screening exam, we sought to determine the inter-rater reliability between ONSD measurements obtained in real time by fellowship-trained emergency ultrasound physicians.

Methods: Three ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians measured bilateral ONSD of 10 healthy volunteers using a high-frequency linear transducer. The physicians were blinded to the other scanners' measurements, and no instructions were given other than to obtain the ONSD. Each sonographer measured the ONSD in real time and it was recorded by a research coordinator. All measurements were recorded in millimeters. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to estimate the inter-rater reliability.

Results: A total of 60 measurements of ONSD were obtained. The average measurement was 4.3 mm (3.83-4.77). Very little variation was found between the three physicians, with a calculated ICC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.63-0.92).

Conclusions: ONSD measurement obtained by ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency medicine physicians is a reliable measurement with a high degree of correlation between scanners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between right atrial pressure measured via right heart catheterization and venous excess ultrasound, inferior vena cava diameter, and ultrasound-measured jugular venous pressure: a prospective observational study. VExUS: common misconceptions, clinical use and future directions. Decoding VExUS: a practical guide for excelling in point-of-care ultrasound assessment of venous congestion. Quantitative lung ultrasound findings correlate with radial alveolar count in experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Tele-education in point-of-care ultrasound training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1