兽医学中主人见证的心肺复苏术的经验和看法。

Sarah M Gradilla, Anusha Balakrishnan, Deborah C Silverstein, Chap L Pratt, Daniel J Fletcher, Jacob M Wolf
{"title":"兽医学中主人见证的心肺复苏术的经验和看法。","authors":"Sarah M Gradilla,&nbsp;Anusha Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Deborah C Silverstein,&nbsp;Chap L Pratt,&nbsp;Daniel J Fletcher,&nbsp;Jacob M Wolf","doi":"10.1111/vec.13180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed resuscitation (OWR) in veterinary medicine and to determine if previous experience with family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) influenced perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic and 2 private practice referral hospitals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Four hundred and seven clients presenting their small animal or exotic pet to the emergency service, or owners of patients hospitalized in the small animal ICU, April 1 to May 15, 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anonymous, online survey. Demographic variables, familiarity with CPR, previous experience with FWR or OWR, and open-ended questions and 4-point Likert items assessing level of agreement with statements on OWR were included. Scores equal or greater than 2 represented positive agreement. An overall OWR mean score was calculated from Likert items. Seventy-nine (19.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7%-23.7%) participants reported having been involved with FWR, and 13 (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-5.5%) reported having witnessed CPR on their pet. Owners were significantly more likely to participate in OWR if they had been present for FWR (P = 0.0004). Ninety-two percent of respondents who had been present for OWR would elect to be present again (95% CI, 62.1%-99.6%). Whether present for OWR or not, owners believed there may be benefits from witnessing CPR and had overall positive feelings toward the practice (OWR mean score, 2.87, SD 0.45 and 2.68, SD 0.54, respectively). Most respondents (78.6%; 95% CI, 74.2%-82.4%) felt that owners should be offered the opportunity to witness CPR on their pets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Owners expressed overall positive experiences with and attitudes toward OWR and believe the option for presence should be provided. As pet owners become more aware of FWR in human medicine, veterinarians may need to be prepared to entertain the possibility of OWR and owners' wishes to remain with their pet during CPR.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":"32 3","pages":"322-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M Gradilla,&nbsp;Anusha Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Deborah C Silverstein,&nbsp;Chap L Pratt,&nbsp;Daniel J Fletcher,&nbsp;Jacob M Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed resuscitation (OWR) in veterinary medicine and to determine if previous experience with family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) influenced perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic and 2 private practice referral hospitals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Four hundred and seven clients presenting their small animal or exotic pet to the emergency service, or owners of patients hospitalized in the small animal ICU, April 1 to May 15, 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anonymous, online survey. Demographic variables, familiarity with CPR, previous experience with FWR or OWR, and open-ended questions and 4-point Likert items assessing level of agreement with statements on OWR were included. Scores equal or greater than 2 represented positive agreement. An overall OWR mean score was calculated from Likert items. Seventy-nine (19.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7%-23.7%) participants reported having been involved with FWR, and 13 (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-5.5%) reported having witnessed CPR on their pet. Owners were significantly more likely to participate in OWR if they had been present for FWR (P = 0.0004). Ninety-two percent of respondents who had been present for OWR would elect to be present again (95% CI, 62.1%-99.6%). Whether present for OWR or not, owners believed there may be benefits from witnessing CPR and had overall positive feelings toward the practice (OWR mean score, 2.87, SD 0.45 and 2.68, SD 0.54, respectively). Most respondents (78.6%; 95% CI, 74.2%-82.4%) felt that owners should be offered the opportunity to witness CPR on their pets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Owners expressed overall positive experiences with and attitudes toward OWR and believe the option for presence should be provided. As pet owners become more aware of FWR in human medicine, veterinarians may need to be prepared to entertain the possibility of OWR and owners' wishes to remain with their pet during CPR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"322-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究兽医学中主人目击复苏(OWR)的经验和感知,并确定以前的家庭目击复苏(FWR)经验是否影响感知。设计:多中心调查。环境:美国两家学术医院和两家私人诊所转诊医院。研究对象:2019年4月1日至5月15日,447名将小动物或外来宠物送到急诊室的客户,或小动物ICU住院患者的主人。干预措施:无测量方法和主要结果:匿名在线调查。包括人口统计变量、对心肺复苏术的熟悉程度、以前使用FWR或OWR的经验、开放式问题和评估与OWR陈述的一致程度的4点李克特项目。分数等于或大于2表示积极同意。总体OWR平均得分由李克特项目计算。七十九(19.4%;95%可信区间[CI], 15.7%-23.7%)的参与者报告参与了FWR, 13名(3.2%;95%可信区间(CI), 1.8%-5.5%)报告说他们目睹了宠物的心肺复苏术。如果业主参加了FWR,他们更有可能参加OWR (P = 0.0004)。曾出席OWR的受访者中有92%会选择再次出席(95% CI, 62.1%-99.6%)。无论是否参加OWR,业主都相信目睹心肺复苏术可能会有好处,并且对这种做法总体上有积极的感觉(OWR平均得分为2.87,SD分别为0.45和2.68,SD分别为0.54)。大多数受访者(78.6%;95%可信区间(CI, 74.2%-82.4%)认为,应该为宠物主人提供目睹宠物心肺复苏的机会。结论:业主总体上表达了对OWR的积极体验和态度,并认为应该提供在场的选择。随着宠物主人越来越意识到人类医学中的FWR,兽医可能需要准备好接受OWR的可能性以及主人在心肺复苏术期间留在宠物身边的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed CPR in veterinary medicine.

Objective: To examine owner experiences with and perceptions of owner-witnessed resuscitation (OWR) in veterinary medicine and to determine if previous experience with family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) influenced perceptions.

Design: Multicenter survey.

Setting: Two academic and 2 private practice referral hospitals in the United States.

Subjects: Four hundred and seven clients presenting their small animal or exotic pet to the emergency service, or owners of patients hospitalized in the small animal ICU, April 1 to May 15, 2019.

Interventions: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anonymous, online survey. Demographic variables, familiarity with CPR, previous experience with FWR or OWR, and open-ended questions and 4-point Likert items assessing level of agreement with statements on OWR were included. Scores equal or greater than 2 represented positive agreement. An overall OWR mean score was calculated from Likert items. Seventy-nine (19.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.7%-23.7%) participants reported having been involved with FWR, and 13 (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-5.5%) reported having witnessed CPR on their pet. Owners were significantly more likely to participate in OWR if they had been present for FWR (P = 0.0004). Ninety-two percent of respondents who had been present for OWR would elect to be present again (95% CI, 62.1%-99.6%). Whether present for OWR or not, owners believed there may be benefits from witnessing CPR and had overall positive feelings toward the practice (OWR mean score, 2.87, SD 0.45 and 2.68, SD 0.54, respectively). Most respondents (78.6%; 95% CI, 74.2%-82.4%) felt that owners should be offered the opportunity to witness CPR on their pets.

Conclusions: Owners expressed overall positive experiences with and attitudes toward OWR and believe the option for presence should be provided. As pet owners become more aware of FWR in human medicine, veterinarians may need to be prepared to entertain the possibility of OWR and owners' wishes to remain with their pet during CPR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of a nasopharyngeal tamponade device in canine cadavers. Evaluation of the Trauma-Associated Severe Hemorrhage score as a predictor of transfusion in traumatized dogs. Analysis of cannabinoids in plasma from 38 cases of suspected cannabinoid intoxication in dogs. Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in a weanling donkey jack. The establishment of reference intervals for the ClotPro thromboelastometry device in healthy dogs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1