这是经桡动脉进入左心室心肌内膜活检的最佳时机吗?

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2021-10-18 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2021.20
Zaccharie Tyler, Oliver P Guttmann, Konstantinos Savvatis, Daniel Jones, Constantinos O'Mahony
{"title":"这是经桡动脉进入左心室心肌内膜活检的最佳时机吗?","authors":"Zaccharie Tyler,&nbsp;Oliver P Guttmann,&nbsp;Konstantinos Savvatis,&nbsp;Daniel Jones,&nbsp;Constantinos O'Mahony","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/e4/icr-16-e29.PMC8548872.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?\",\"authors\":\"Zaccharie Tyler,&nbsp;Oliver P Guttmann,&nbsp;Konstantinos Savvatis,&nbsp;Daniel Jones,&nbsp;Constantinos O'Mahony\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/icr.2021.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"e29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/e4/icr-16-e29.PMC8548872.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左心室心肌内膜活检(EMB)是治疗心肌炎的重要工具,通常通过经股通道(TFA)进行。Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB)是一种新颖的替代方法,作者试图通过对文献进行系统的回顾来确定其安全性和可行性。Medline在2020年进行了检索,并从选定的研究中提取了队列人口统计数据、程序细节和并发症。四项观察性研究共纳入496项手术。TRA-EMB最常采用无鞘MP1导管经右桡动脉。最常见的并发症是心包积液(在一项研究中高达11%),但心包填塞引流是罕见的(一个报告病例)。死亡和二尖瓣损伤未见报道。TRA-EMB在99%的报告程序中成功获得了样品。作者认为TRA-EMB是TFA-EMB的一种安全可行的替代方法,最常见的并发症是无并发症的心包积液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?

Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1