使用助听器的儿童低水平语音识别。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-10 DOI:10.1055/a-1692-9670
Jace Wolfe, Mila Duke, Sharon Miller, Erin Schafer, Christine Jones, Lori Rakita, Andrea Dunn, Jarrod Battles, Sara Neumann, Jacy Manning
{"title":"使用助听器的儿童低水平语音识别。","authors":"Jace Wolfe,&nbsp;Mila Duke,&nbsp;Sharon Miller,&nbsp;Erin Schafer,&nbsp;Christine Jones,&nbsp;Lori Rakita,&nbsp;Andrea Dunn,&nbsp;Jarrod Battles,&nbsp;Sara Neumann,&nbsp;Jacy Manning","doi":"10.1055/a-1692-9670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For children with hearing loss, the primary goal of hearing aids is to provide improved access to the auditory environment within the limits of hearing aid technology and the child's auditory abilities. However, there are limited data examining aided speech recognition at very low (40 decibels A [dBA]) and low (50 dBA) presentation levels.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the paucity of studies exploring aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss, the present study aimed to (1) compare aided speech recognition at different presentation levels between groups of children with \"normal\" hearing and hearing loss, (2) explore the effects of aided pure tone average and aided Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) on aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss ranging in degree from mild to severe, and (3) evaluate the effect of increasing low-level gain on aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>In phase 1 of this study, a two-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate differences in speech recognition. In phase 2 of this study, a single-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate the potential benefit of additional low-level hearing aid gain for low-level aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The first phase of the study included 27 school-age children with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and 12 school-age children with \"normal\" hearing. The second phase included eight children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Prior to the study, children with hearing loss were fitted binaurally with digital hearing aids. Children in the second phase were fitted binaurally with digital study hearing aids and completed a trial period with two different gain settings: (1) gain required to match hearing aid output to prescriptive targets (i.e., primary program), and (2) a 6-dB increase in overall gain for low-level inputs relative to the primary program. In both phases of this study, real-ear verification measures were completed to ensure the hearing aid output matched prescriptive targets.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Phase 1 included monosyllabic word recognition and syllable-final plural recognition at three presentation levels (40, 50, and 60 dBA). Phase 2 compared speech recognition performance for the same test measures and presentation levels with two differing gain prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In phase 1 of the study, aided speech recognition was significantly poorer in children with hearing loss at all presentation levels. Higher aided SII in the better ear (55 dB sound pressure level input) was associated with higher Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition at a 40 dBA presentation level. In phase 2, increasing the hearing aid gain for low-level inputs provided a significant improvement in syllable-final plural recognition at very low-level inputs and resulted in a nonsignificant trend toward better monosyllabic word recognition at very low presentation levels. Additional research is needed to document the speech recognition difficulties children with hearing aids may experience with low-level speech in the real world as well as the potential benefit or detriment of providing additional low-level hearing aid gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.\",\"authors\":\"Jace Wolfe,&nbsp;Mila Duke,&nbsp;Sharon Miller,&nbsp;Erin Schafer,&nbsp;Christine Jones,&nbsp;Lori Rakita,&nbsp;Andrea Dunn,&nbsp;Jarrod Battles,&nbsp;Sara Neumann,&nbsp;Jacy Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1692-9670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For children with hearing loss, the primary goal of hearing aids is to provide improved access to the auditory environment within the limits of hearing aid technology and the child's auditory abilities. However, there are limited data examining aided speech recognition at very low (40 decibels A [dBA]) and low (50 dBA) presentation levels.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the paucity of studies exploring aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss, the present study aimed to (1) compare aided speech recognition at different presentation levels between groups of children with \\\"normal\\\" hearing and hearing loss, (2) explore the effects of aided pure tone average and aided Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) on aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss ranging in degree from mild to severe, and (3) evaluate the effect of increasing low-level gain on aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>In phase 1 of this study, a two-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate differences in speech recognition. In phase 2 of this study, a single-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate the potential benefit of additional low-level hearing aid gain for low-level aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>The first phase of the study included 27 school-age children with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and 12 school-age children with \\\"normal\\\" hearing. The second phase included eight children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Prior to the study, children with hearing loss were fitted binaurally with digital hearing aids. Children in the second phase were fitted binaurally with digital study hearing aids and completed a trial period with two different gain settings: (1) gain required to match hearing aid output to prescriptive targets (i.e., primary program), and (2) a 6-dB increase in overall gain for low-level inputs relative to the primary program. In both phases of this study, real-ear verification measures were completed to ensure the hearing aid output matched prescriptive targets.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Phase 1 included monosyllabic word recognition and syllable-final plural recognition at three presentation levels (40, 50, and 60 dBA). Phase 2 compared speech recognition performance for the same test measures and presentation levels with two differing gain prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In phase 1 of the study, aided speech recognition was significantly poorer in children with hearing loss at all presentation levels. Higher aided SII in the better ear (55 dB sound pressure level input) was associated with higher Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition at a 40 dBA presentation level. In phase 2, increasing the hearing aid gain for low-level inputs provided a significant improvement in syllable-final plural recognition at very low-level inputs and resulted in a nonsignificant trend toward better monosyllabic word recognition at very low presentation levels. Additional research is needed to document the speech recognition difficulties children with hearing aids may experience with low-level speech in the real world as well as the potential benefit or detriment of providing additional low-level hearing aid gain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1692-9670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1692-9670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于听力损失的儿童,助听器的主要目标是在助听器技术和儿童听觉能力的限制下提供更好的听觉环境。然而,在非常低(40分贝A [dBA])和低(50分贝)表示水平下检查辅助语音识别的数据有限。目的:由于缺乏对听力损失儿童低呈现水平辅助语音识别的研究,本研究旨在(1)比较听力正常儿童和听力损失儿童在不同呈现水平下的辅助语音识别;(2)探讨辅助纯音平均和辅助语音清晰度指数(SII)对轻度至重度听力损失儿童低呈现水平辅助语音识别的影响;(3)评价提高低呈现水平对听力损失儿童辅助语音识别的影响。研究设计:在本研究的第一阶段,采用两组重复测量设计来评估语音识别的差异。在本研究的第二阶段,采用单组重复测量设计来评估额外的低水平助听器增益对听力损失儿童低水平辅助语音识别的潜在益处。研究样本:研究的第一阶段包括27名轻度至重度感音神经性听力损失的学龄儿童和12名听力正常的学龄儿童。第二阶段包括8名轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的儿童。干预措施:在研究之前,听力损失的儿童被安装双耳数字助听器。第二阶段的儿童双耳配备数字学习助听器,并完成了两种不同增益设置的试验期:(1)将助听器输出与规定目标(即初级程序)相匹配所需的增益;(2)相对于初级程序,低水平输入的总增益增加6db。在本研究的两个阶段都完成了实耳验证措施,以确保助听器输出符合规定的目标。数据收集和分析:第一阶段包括单音节词识别和音节末复数识别,在三个表示级别(40、50和60 dBA)。第二阶段比较了两种不同增益处方下相同测试措施和表示水平下的语音识别性能。结论:在第一阶段的研究中,所有表现水平的听力损失儿童的辅助语音识别都明显较差。在较好的耳朵(55 dB声压级输入)中,较高的辅助SII与在40 dBA呈现水平下较高的辅音-核-辅音单词识别相关。在第二阶段,增加低水平输入的助听器增益可以显著改善极低水平输入时的音节末复数识别,并导致极低呈现水平时单音节单词识别的不显著趋势。需要进一步的研究来证明使用助听器的儿童在现实世界中可能遇到的低水平语音识别困难,以及提供额外的低水平助听器增益的潜在利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-Level Speech Recognition of Children with Hearing Aids.

Background: For children with hearing loss, the primary goal of hearing aids is to provide improved access to the auditory environment within the limits of hearing aid technology and the child's auditory abilities. However, there are limited data examining aided speech recognition at very low (40 decibels A [dBA]) and low (50 dBA) presentation levels.

Purpose: Due to the paucity of studies exploring aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss, the present study aimed to (1) compare aided speech recognition at different presentation levels between groups of children with "normal" hearing and hearing loss, (2) explore the effects of aided pure tone average and aided Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) on aided speech recognition at low presentation levels for children with hearing loss ranging in degree from mild to severe, and (3) evaluate the effect of increasing low-level gain on aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.

Research design: In phase 1 of this study, a two-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate differences in speech recognition. In phase 2 of this study, a single-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate the potential benefit of additional low-level hearing aid gain for low-level aided speech recognition of children with hearing loss.

Study sample: The first phase of the study included 27 school-age children with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss and 12 school-age children with "normal" hearing. The second phase included eight children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Intervention: Prior to the study, children with hearing loss were fitted binaurally with digital hearing aids. Children in the second phase were fitted binaurally with digital study hearing aids and completed a trial period with two different gain settings: (1) gain required to match hearing aid output to prescriptive targets (i.e., primary program), and (2) a 6-dB increase in overall gain for low-level inputs relative to the primary program. In both phases of this study, real-ear verification measures were completed to ensure the hearing aid output matched prescriptive targets.

Data collection and analysis: Phase 1 included monosyllabic word recognition and syllable-final plural recognition at three presentation levels (40, 50, and 60 dBA). Phase 2 compared speech recognition performance for the same test measures and presentation levels with two differing gain prescriptions.

Conclusion: In phase 1 of the study, aided speech recognition was significantly poorer in children with hearing loss at all presentation levels. Higher aided SII in the better ear (55 dB sound pressure level input) was associated with higher Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition at a 40 dBA presentation level. In phase 2, increasing the hearing aid gain for low-level inputs provided a significant improvement in syllable-final plural recognition at very low-level inputs and resulted in a nonsignificant trend toward better monosyllabic word recognition at very low presentation levels. Additional research is needed to document the speech recognition difficulties children with hearing aids may experience with low-level speech in the real world as well as the potential benefit or detriment of providing additional low-level hearing aid gain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1