{"title":"老年人防护帽产品在模拟与坠落有关的头部撞击中提供的撞击衰减。","authors":"Daniel R Martel, Michelle R Tanel, Andrew C Laing","doi":"10.1177/20556683211050357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While protective headwear products (PHP) are designed to protect older adults from fall-related head injuries, there are limited data on their protective capacity. This study's goal was to assess the impact attenuation provided by commercially available PHP during simulated head impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A drop tower and Hybrid III headform measured the decrease in peak linear acceleration (<i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> ) provided by 12 PHP for front- and back-of-head impacts at low (clinically relevant: 3.5 m/s) and high (5.7 m/s) impact velocities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range of <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> across PHP was larger at the low velocity (56% and 41% for back and frontal impacts, respectively) vs. high velocity condition (27% and 38% for back and frontal impacts, respectively). A significant interaction between impact location and velocity was observed (<i>p</i> < .05), with significantly greater <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> for back-of-head compared to front-of-head impacts at the low impact velocity (19% mean difference). While not significant, there was a modest positive association between <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> and product padding thickness for back-of-head impacts (<i>p</i> = .095; r = 0.349).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the wide range in impact attenuation across commercially available PHP, and suggests that existing products provide greater impact attenuation during back-of-head impacts. These data may inform evidence-based decisions for clinicians and consumers and help drive industry innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/15/10.1177_20556683211050357.PMC8645304.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact attenuation provided by older adult protective headwear products during simulated fall-related head impacts.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R Martel, Michelle R Tanel, Andrew C Laing\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683211050357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While protective headwear products (PHP) are designed to protect older adults from fall-related head injuries, there are limited data on their protective capacity. This study's goal was to assess the impact attenuation provided by commercially available PHP during simulated head impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A drop tower and Hybrid III headform measured the decrease in peak linear acceleration (<i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> ) provided by 12 PHP for front- and back-of-head impacts at low (clinically relevant: 3.5 m/s) and high (5.7 m/s) impact velocities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range of <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> across PHP was larger at the low velocity (56% and 41% for back and frontal impacts, respectively) vs. high velocity condition (27% and 38% for back and frontal impacts, respectively). A significant interaction between impact location and velocity was observed (<i>p</i> < .05), with significantly greater <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> for back-of-head compared to front-of-head impacts at the low impact velocity (19% mean difference). While not significant, there was a modest positive association between <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> and product padding thickness for back-of-head impacts (<i>p</i> = .095; r = 0.349).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the wide range in impact attenuation across commercially available PHP, and suggests that existing products provide greater impact attenuation during back-of-head impacts. These data may inform evidence-based decisions for clinicians and consumers and help drive industry innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/15/10.1177_20556683211050357.PMC8645304.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211050357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211050357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact attenuation provided by older adult protective headwear products during simulated fall-related head impacts.
Introduction: While protective headwear products (PHP) are designed to protect older adults from fall-related head injuries, there are limited data on their protective capacity. This study's goal was to assess the impact attenuation provided by commercially available PHP during simulated head impacts.
Methods: A drop tower and Hybrid III headform measured the decrease in peak linear acceleration (gatten ) provided by 12 PHP for front- and back-of-head impacts at low (clinically relevant: 3.5 m/s) and high (5.7 m/s) impact velocities.
Results: The range of gatten across PHP was larger at the low velocity (56% and 41% for back and frontal impacts, respectively) vs. high velocity condition (27% and 38% for back and frontal impacts, respectively). A significant interaction between impact location and velocity was observed (p < .05), with significantly greater gatten for back-of-head compared to front-of-head impacts at the low impact velocity (19% mean difference). While not significant, there was a modest positive association between gatten and product padding thickness for back-of-head impacts (p = .095; r = 0.349).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the wide range in impact attenuation across commercially available PHP, and suggests that existing products provide greater impact attenuation during back-of-head impacts. These data may inform evidence-based decisions for clinicians and consumers and help drive industry innovation.