肝-肝交界区肝癌用AXB算法替代AAA行SBRT对肿瘤控制概率的影响

BJR open Pub Date : 2021-11-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1259/bjro.20210041
Michael Lok Man Cheung, Monica Wk Kan, Vanessa Ty Yeung, Darren Mc Poon, Michael Km Kam, Louis Ky Lee, Anthony Tc Chan
{"title":"肝-肝交界区肝癌用AXB算法替代AAA行SBRT对肿瘤控制概率的影响","authors":"Michael Lok Man Cheung,&nbsp;Monica Wk Kan,&nbsp;Vanessa Ty Yeung,&nbsp;Darren Mc Poon,&nbsp;Michael Km Kam,&nbsp;Louis Ky Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Tc Chan","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20210041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611685/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect on tumour control probability of using AXB algorithm in replacement of AAA for SBRT of hepatocellular carcinoma located at lung-liver boundary region.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lok Man Cheung,&nbsp;Monica Wk Kan,&nbsp;Vanessa Ty Yeung,&nbsp;Darren Mc Poon,&nbsp;Michael Km Kam,&nbsp;Louis Ky Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Tc Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjro.20210041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJR open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJR open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:回顾性分析acros XB算法(AXB)替代各向异性分析算法(AAA)对肺肝交界肝细胞癌立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的临床影响。方法:在相同的治疗参数下,分别采用AAA和AXB计算23个SBRT体积调节弧治疗(VMAT)方案。比较计划靶体积(PTVs)的剂量-体积数据。采用已发表的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)模型计算AAA与AXB剂量学差异对肿瘤控制概率的影响。结果:AXB计算的剂量(剂量到培养基),PTV的D95%和D98%比AAA计算的D95%和D98%平均低2.4和3.1%;AXB计算的剂量(剂量到水),PTV的D95%和D98%比AAA计算的D95%和D98%平均低1.8%,比AAA计算的低2.7%,最严重的病例D95%和D98%的差异可达5%和8%。与AAA相比,AXB计算的D95%显着下降可能导致2年TCP下降%,最坏情况下下降8%(从46.8%降至42.9%)。结论:AAA和AXB计算剂量的差异可导致位于肺肝交界区HCC SBRT的TCP有显著差异。知识进展:比较AAA算法和AXB算法在肺肝边界区肝癌SBRT计算剂量和肿瘤控制概率的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect on tumour control probability of using AXB algorithm in replacement of AAA for SBRT of hepatocellular carcinoma located at lung-liver boundary region.

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).

Methods: 23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.

Results: For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).

Conclusion: The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.

Advances in knowledge: The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional dose prediction based on deep convolutional neural networks for brain cancer in CyberKnife: accurate beam modelling of homogeneous tissue. Advancing radiology practice and research: harnessing the potential of large language models amidst imperfections. Improvement in paediatric CT use and justification: a single-centre experience. Deuterium MR spectroscopy: potential applications in oncology research. Unlocking the potential of photon counting detector CT for paediatric imaging: a pictorial essay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1