肝-肝交界区肝癌用AXB算法替代AAA行SBRT对肿瘤控制概率的影响

IF 2.1 BJR open Pub Date : 2021-11-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1259/bjro.20210041
Michael Lok Man Cheung, Monica Wk Kan, Vanessa Ty Yeung, Darren Mc Poon, Michael Km Kam, Louis Ky Lee, Anthony Tc Chan
{"title":"肝-肝交界区肝癌用AXB算法替代AAA行SBRT对肿瘤控制概率的影响","authors":"Michael Lok Man Cheung,&nbsp;Monica Wk Kan,&nbsp;Vanessa Ty Yeung,&nbsp;Darren Mc Poon,&nbsp;Michael Km Kam,&nbsp;Louis Ky Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Tc Chan","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20210041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":" ","pages":"20210041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611685/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect on tumour control probability of using AXB algorithm in replacement of AAA for SBRT of hepatocellular carcinoma located at lung-liver boundary region.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lok Man Cheung,&nbsp;Monica Wk Kan,&nbsp;Vanessa Ty Yeung,&nbsp;Darren Mc Poon,&nbsp;Michael Km Kam,&nbsp;Louis Ky Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Tc Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjro.20210041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJR open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20210041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJR open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:回顾性分析acros XB算法(AXB)替代各向异性分析算法(AAA)对肺肝交界肝细胞癌立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的临床影响。方法:在相同的治疗参数下,分别采用AAA和AXB计算23个SBRT体积调节弧治疗(VMAT)方案。比较计划靶体积(PTVs)的剂量-体积数据。采用已发表的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)模型计算AAA与AXB剂量学差异对肿瘤控制概率的影响。结果:AXB计算的剂量(剂量到培养基),PTV的D95%和D98%比AAA计算的D95%和D98%平均低2.4和3.1%;AXB计算的剂量(剂量到水),PTV的D95%和D98%比AAA计算的D95%和D98%平均低1.8%,比AAA计算的低2.7%,最严重的病例D95%和D98%的差异可达5%和8%。与AAA相比,AXB计算的D95%显着下降可能导致2年TCP下降%,最坏情况下下降8%(从46.8%降至42.9%)。结论:AAA和AXB计算剂量的差异可导致位于肺肝交界区HCC SBRT的TCP有显著差异。知识进展:比较AAA算法和AXB算法在肺肝边界区肝癌SBRT计算剂量和肿瘤控制概率的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect on tumour control probability of using AXB algorithm in replacement of AAA for SBRT of hepatocellular carcinoma located at lung-liver boundary region.

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical impact on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located at lung-liver boundary due to the use of Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) in replacement of anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA).

Methods: 23 SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for HCC located at lung-liver boundary were calculated using AAA and AXB respectively with the same treatment parameters. The dose-volume data of the planned target volumes (PTVs) were compared. A published tumour control probability (TCP) model was used to calculate the effect of dosimetric difference between AAA and AXB on tumour control probability.

Results: For dose calculated by AXB (Dose to medium), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 2.4 and 3.1% less than that calculated by AAA. For dose calculated by AXB (dose to water), the D95% and D98% of the PTV were on average 1.8%, and 2.7% less than that calculated by AAA. Up to 5% difference in D95% and 8% difference in D98% were observed in the worst cases. The significant decrease in D95% calculated by AXB compared to AAA could result in a % decrease in 2 year TCP up to 8% in the worst case (from 46.8 to 42.9%).

Conclusion: The difference in dose calculated by AAA and AXB could lead to significant difference in TCP for HCC SBRT located at lung-liver boundary region.

Advances in knowledge: The difference in calculated dose and tumour control probability for HCC SBRT between AAA and AXB algorithm at lung-liver boundary region was compared.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal time for MRI response evaluation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Triple-bolus CT urography: an optimized approach for vascular assessment in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Medico-legal considerations in post-mortem imaging data: governance, ethics, and evidential use. Are radiology residents safe to report feeding nasogastric (NG) tubes on chest X-rays? Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for the prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: literature analysis and practical challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1