使用明确标准评价65岁以上住院患者潜在不适当用药:系统文献综述。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2021-11-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S303101
Hesah Alshammari, Eman Al-Saeed, Zamzam Ahmed, Zoe Aslanpour
{"title":"使用明确标准评价65岁以上住院患者潜在不适当用药:系统文献综述。","authors":"Hesah Alshammari,&nbsp;Eman Al-Saeed,&nbsp;Zamzam Ahmed,&nbsp;Zoe Aslanpour","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S303101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is a primary health concern affecting the quality of life of patients over 65. PIM is associated with adverse drug reactions including falls, increased healthcare costs, health services utilization and hospital admissions. Various strategies, clinical guidelines and tools (explicit and implicit) have been developed to tackle this health concern. Despite these efforts, evidence still indicates a high prevalence of PIM in the older adult population. This systematic review explored the practice of using explicit tools to review PIM in hospitalized patients and examined the outcomes of PIM reduction. A literature search was conducted in several databases from their inception to 2019. Original studies that had an interventional element using explicit criteria detecting PIM in hospitalized patients over 65 were included. Descriptive narrative synthesis was used to analyze the included studies. The literature search yielded 6116 articles; 25 quantitative studies were included in this systematic literature review. Twenty were prospective studies and five were retrospective. Approximately, 15,500 patients were included in the review. Various healthcare professionals were involved in reviewing PIM including physicians and hospital pharmacists. Several tools were used to review PIM for hospitalized patients over 65, most frequently Beer's criteria and the STOPP/START tool. The reduction of PIM ranged from 3.5% up to 87%. The most common PIM were benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. This systematic review showed promising outcomes in terms of improving patient outcomes. However, the reduction of PIM varied in the studies, raising the question of the variance between hospitals in the explicit tools used for review. Additional studies need to be conducted to further investigate the outcomes of reviewing PIM at different levels, as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of using explicit tools in reducing PIM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"13 ","pages":"183-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/45/dhps-13-183.PMC8572741.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Hospitalized Patients Over 65 Using Explicit Criteria: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hesah Alshammari,&nbsp;Eman Al-Saeed,&nbsp;Zamzam Ahmed,&nbsp;Zoe Aslanpour\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S303101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is a primary health concern affecting the quality of life of patients over 65. PIM is associated with adverse drug reactions including falls, increased healthcare costs, health services utilization and hospital admissions. Various strategies, clinical guidelines and tools (explicit and implicit) have been developed to tackle this health concern. Despite these efforts, evidence still indicates a high prevalence of PIM in the older adult population. This systematic review explored the practice of using explicit tools to review PIM in hospitalized patients and examined the outcomes of PIM reduction. A literature search was conducted in several databases from their inception to 2019. Original studies that had an interventional element using explicit criteria detecting PIM in hospitalized patients over 65 were included. Descriptive narrative synthesis was used to analyze the included studies. The literature search yielded 6116 articles; 25 quantitative studies were included in this systematic literature review. Twenty were prospective studies and five were retrospective. Approximately, 15,500 patients were included in the review. Various healthcare professionals were involved in reviewing PIM including physicians and hospital pharmacists. Several tools were used to review PIM for hospitalized patients over 65, most frequently Beer's criteria and the STOPP/START tool. The reduction of PIM ranged from 3.5% up to 87%. The most common PIM were benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. This systematic review showed promising outcomes in terms of improving patient outcomes. However, the reduction of PIM varied in the studies, raising the question of the variance between hospitals in the explicit tools used for review. Additional studies need to be conducted to further investigate the outcomes of reviewing PIM at different levels, as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of using explicit tools in reducing PIM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"183-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/45/dhps-13-183.PMC8572741.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S303101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S303101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

潜在不适当用药(PIM)是影响65岁以上患者生活质量的主要健康问题。PIM与药物不良反应有关,包括跌倒、医疗费用增加、卫生服务利用和住院。已经制定了各种战略、临床指南和工具(明确的和隐含的)来解决这一健康问题。尽管做出了这些努力,但证据仍然表明,PIM在老年人中的患病率很高。本系统综述探讨了使用明确的工具来评估住院患者PIM的实践,并检查了PIM降低的结果。从建立到2019年,在几个数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入了使用明确标准检测65岁以上住院患者PIM的介入因素的原始研究。采用描述性叙事综合法对纳入的研究进行分析。文献检索得到6116篇;本系统文献综述纳入了25项定量研究。20项为前瞻性研究,5项为回顾性研究。大约15,500名患者被纳入该综述。各种医疗保健专业人员参与了PIM的审查,包括医生和医院药剂师。有几种工具用于评估65岁以上住院患者的PIM,最常见的是Beer标准和STOPP/START工具。PIM的降低幅度从3.5%到87%不等。最常见的PIM是苯二氮卓类药物和抗精神病药物。该系统综述显示了改善患者预后的良好结果。然而,在研究中,PIM的减少有所不同,这就提出了用于审查的明确工具在医院之间差异的问题。需要进行更多的研究,以进一步调查在不同层次审查PIM的结果,并评估使用明确工具减少PIM的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reviewing Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Hospitalized Patients Over 65 Using Explicit Criteria: A Systematic Literature Review.

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is a primary health concern affecting the quality of life of patients over 65. PIM is associated with adverse drug reactions including falls, increased healthcare costs, health services utilization and hospital admissions. Various strategies, clinical guidelines and tools (explicit and implicit) have been developed to tackle this health concern. Despite these efforts, evidence still indicates a high prevalence of PIM in the older adult population. This systematic review explored the practice of using explicit tools to review PIM in hospitalized patients and examined the outcomes of PIM reduction. A literature search was conducted in several databases from their inception to 2019. Original studies that had an interventional element using explicit criteria detecting PIM in hospitalized patients over 65 were included. Descriptive narrative synthesis was used to analyze the included studies. The literature search yielded 6116 articles; 25 quantitative studies were included in this systematic literature review. Twenty were prospective studies and five were retrospective. Approximately, 15,500 patients were included in the review. Various healthcare professionals were involved in reviewing PIM including physicians and hospital pharmacists. Several tools were used to review PIM for hospitalized patients over 65, most frequently Beer's criteria and the STOPP/START tool. The reduction of PIM ranged from 3.5% up to 87%. The most common PIM were benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. This systematic review showed promising outcomes in terms of improving patient outcomes. However, the reduction of PIM varied in the studies, raising the question of the variance between hospitals in the explicit tools used for review. Additional studies need to be conducted to further investigate the outcomes of reviewing PIM at different levels, as well as assessing the cost-effectiveness of using explicit tools in reducing PIM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Response to Letter]. Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Letter]. Adverse Drug Reactions Related with Antibiotic Medicines in Malawi: A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1