社区慈善实践:以“千流”为例。

Fahad Ahmad, Ashlesha Khadse
{"title":"社区慈善实践:以“千流”为例。","authors":"Fahad Ahmad,&nbsp;Ashlesha Khadse","doi":"10.1007/s42413-021-00158-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As philanthropy has emerged to play a prominent role in supporting community well-being efforts, important critiques have been raised about the undemocratic nature of philanthropy that appears to privilege private interests over community needs. In response to these concerns, Community Philanthropy (CP) has emerged as a philanthropic model that prioritizes community asset-building, agency, and trust in order to \"shift power\" to beneficiary communities (Hodgson & Pond (2018). How community philanthropy shifts power. Grantcraft. Retrieved August 14, 2021, from https://grantcraft.org/content/guides/how-community-philanthropy-shifts-power). Despite its promise, questions remain about how CP can practically achieve the goals of sharing power, building trust, and showing solidarity toward community self-determination for well-being. To address these gaps, we examine the case of Thousand Currents, a public foundation that has pioneered a CP inspired grantmaking model. Thousand Currents provides long-term unrestricted grants to grassroots partners (grantees), learns about partner concerns, acts upon partner feedback, and is self-reflexive about its positional power as a funder. The foundation achieves its grantmaking objectives by taking deliberate fundraising and staffing decisions. Our case study showcases how other foundations can take steps towards actualizing CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":73439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of community well-being","volume":"5 2","pages":"359-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community philanthropy as practice: A case study of Thousand Currents.\",\"authors\":\"Fahad Ahmad,&nbsp;Ashlesha Khadse\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42413-021-00158-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As philanthropy has emerged to play a prominent role in supporting community well-being efforts, important critiques have been raised about the undemocratic nature of philanthropy that appears to privilege private interests over community needs. In response to these concerns, Community Philanthropy (CP) has emerged as a philanthropic model that prioritizes community asset-building, agency, and trust in order to \\\"shift power\\\" to beneficiary communities (Hodgson & Pond (2018). How community philanthropy shifts power. Grantcraft. Retrieved August 14, 2021, from https://grantcraft.org/content/guides/how-community-philanthropy-shifts-power). Despite its promise, questions remain about how CP can practically achieve the goals of sharing power, building trust, and showing solidarity toward community self-determination for well-being. To address these gaps, we examine the case of Thousand Currents, a public foundation that has pioneered a CP inspired grantmaking model. Thousand Currents provides long-term unrestricted grants to grassroots partners (grantees), learns about partner concerns, acts upon partner feedback, and is self-reflexive about its positional power as a funder. The foundation achieves its grantmaking objectives by taking deliberate fundraising and staffing decisions. Our case study showcases how other foundations can take steps towards actualizing CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of community well-being\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"359-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8751465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of community well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00158-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of community well-being","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00158-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着慈善事业在支持社区福祉方面发挥着重要作用,人们对慈善事业的不民主性质提出了重要批评,慈善事业似乎将私人利益置于社区需求之上。针对这些担忧,社区慈善(CP)作为一种慈善模式出现了,它优先考虑社区资产建设、代理和信任,以便将权力“转移”给受益社区(Hodgson & Pond(2018))。社区慈善如何改变权力。Grantcraft。检索日期:2021年8月14日,网址:https://grantcraft.org/content/guides/how-community-philanthropy-shifts-power)。尽管有这样的承诺,但CP如何才能真正实现分享权力、建立信任和团结一致的目标,以实现社区自决的福祉,这些问题仍然存在。为了解决这些差距,我们研究了“千流”的案例,这是一个公共基金会,它开创了一种受CP启发的资助模式。千流为基层合作伙伴(受助人)提供长期无限制的资助,了解合作伙伴的关切,根据合作伙伴的反馈采取行动,并对其作为资助方的地位权力进行自我反思。基金会通过深思熟虑的筹款和人员配置决定来实现其资助目标。我们的案例研究展示了其他基金会如何采取措施实现CP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community philanthropy as practice: A case study of Thousand Currents.

As philanthropy has emerged to play a prominent role in supporting community well-being efforts, important critiques have been raised about the undemocratic nature of philanthropy that appears to privilege private interests over community needs. In response to these concerns, Community Philanthropy (CP) has emerged as a philanthropic model that prioritizes community asset-building, agency, and trust in order to "shift power" to beneficiary communities (Hodgson & Pond (2018). How community philanthropy shifts power. Grantcraft. Retrieved August 14, 2021, from https://grantcraft.org/content/guides/how-community-philanthropy-shifts-power). Despite its promise, questions remain about how CP can practically achieve the goals of sharing power, building trust, and showing solidarity toward community self-determination for well-being. To address these gaps, we examine the case of Thousand Currents, a public foundation that has pioneered a CP inspired grantmaking model. Thousand Currents provides long-term unrestricted grants to grassroots partners (grantees), learns about partner concerns, acts upon partner feedback, and is self-reflexive about its positional power as a funder. The foundation achieves its grantmaking objectives by taking deliberate fundraising and staffing decisions. Our case study showcases how other foundations can take steps towards actualizing CP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Landscape of Gig Workers’ Well-Being: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Worker Satisfaction with Special Emphasis on Gig Economy: A Review for Potential Research Paradigm Do Children Matter in the Quest for Sustainable Development Goals Attainment? Children’s Vulnerability and Water Scarcity in Zimbabwe Ethnic Minority Inclusion in Well-Being Research: Beyond Widening Participation The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in Community Wellbeing Research: Deliberative Method and the Lens of ‘Pragmatic Complexity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1