[腹侧壁疝气的处理]。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Chirurg Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z
Gernot Köhler, Richard Kaltenböck, Hans-Jörg Fehrer, Reinhold Függer, Odo Gangl
{"title":"[腹侧壁疝气的处理]。","authors":"Gernot Köhler, Richard Kaltenböck, Hans-Jörg Fehrer, Reinhold Függer, Odo Gangl","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lateral abdominal wall hernias are rare and inconsistently defined, which is why the use of the European Hernia Society classification makes sense, not least for the purpose of comparing the quality of surgical results. A distinction must be made between true fascial defects and denervation atrophy. Based on the available literature, there is generally a low level of evidence with no consensus on the best operative strategy. The proximity to bony structures and the complex anatomy of the three-layer abdominal wall make the technical treatment of lateral hernias difficult. The surgical variations include laparoendoscopic, robotic, minimally invasive, open or hybrid approaches with different mesh positions in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. The extensive preperitoneal mesh reinforcement open, transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair or total extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair has met with the greatest approval. The extent of the required medial mesh overlap is determined by the distance between the medial defect boundary and the lateral edge of the straight rectus abdominus muscles. The medially directed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal dissection can be extended into the homolateral retrorectus compartment by laterally incising the posterior rectus sheath or by crossing the midline behind the intact linea alba into the contralateral retrorectus compartment. The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique is a suitable procedure only for smaller defects with possible defect closure but it is also important as an exit strategy in the case of a defective peritoneum. Individualized prehabilitative and preconditioning measures are just as important as the assessment of preoperative anamnestic and clinical findings and risks with radiographic cross-sectional imaging diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 4","pages":"373-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Management of lateral abdominal wall hernias].\",\"authors\":\"Gernot Köhler, Richard Kaltenböck, Hans-Jörg Fehrer, Reinhold Függer, Odo Gangl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lateral abdominal wall hernias are rare and inconsistently defined, which is why the use of the European Hernia Society classification makes sense, not least for the purpose of comparing the quality of surgical results. A distinction must be made between true fascial defects and denervation atrophy. Based on the available literature, there is generally a low level of evidence with no consensus on the best operative strategy. The proximity to bony structures and the complex anatomy of the three-layer abdominal wall make the technical treatment of lateral hernias difficult. The surgical variations include laparoendoscopic, robotic, minimally invasive, open or hybrid approaches with different mesh positions in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. The extensive preperitoneal mesh reinforcement open, transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair or total extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair has met with the greatest approval. The extent of the required medial mesh overlap is determined by the distance between the medial defect boundary and the lateral edge of the straight rectus abdominus muscles. The medially directed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal dissection can be extended into the homolateral retrorectus compartment by laterally incising the posterior rectus sheath or by crossing the midline behind the intact linea alba into the contralateral retrorectus compartment. The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique is a suitable procedure only for smaller defects with possible defect closure but it is also important as an exit strategy in the case of a defective peritoneum. Individualized prehabilitative and preconditioning measures are just as important as the assessment of preoperative anamnestic and clinical findings and risks with radiographic cross-sectional imaging diagnostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurg\",\"volume\":\"93 4\",\"pages\":\"373-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01537-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹壁外侧疝非常罕见,定义也不一致,因此使用欧洲疝气协会的分类方法是有意义的,尤其是为了比较手术结果的质量。必须区分真正的筋膜缺损和神经支配萎缩。从现有文献来看,证据水平普遍较低,最佳手术策略尚未达成共识。外侧疝邻近骨性结构,且腹壁三层解剖结构复杂,这给外侧疝的技术治疗带来了困难。手术方法多种多样,包括腹腔镜、机器人、微创、开腹或混合手术,网片与腹壁各层的位置也各不相同。腹膜前广泛网片加固开放式、经腹腹膜(TAPP)腹腔镜修复术或全腹膜外(TEP)内窥镜修复术最受欢迎。所需的内侧网片重叠范围取决于内侧缺损边界与腹直肌外侧边缘之间的距离。内侧定向的腹膜前和腹膜后剥离可通过横向切开直肌后鞘或在完整白线后方穿过中线进入对侧直肌后间隙而扩展到同侧直肌后间隙。腹膜内嵌网(IPOM)技术仅适用于较小的腹膜缺损,并有可能进行缺损闭合,但作为腹膜缺损情况下的一种退出策略也很重要。个性化的术前康复和预处理措施与术前肛门和临床检查结果评估以及放射横断面成像诊断风险同样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Management of lateral abdominal wall hernias].

Lateral abdominal wall hernias are rare and inconsistently defined, which is why the use of the European Hernia Society classification makes sense, not least for the purpose of comparing the quality of surgical results. A distinction must be made between true fascial defects and denervation atrophy. Based on the available literature, there is generally a low level of evidence with no consensus on the best operative strategy. The proximity to bony structures and the complex anatomy of the three-layer abdominal wall make the technical treatment of lateral hernias difficult. The surgical variations include laparoendoscopic, robotic, minimally invasive, open or hybrid approaches with different mesh positions in relation to the layers of the abdominal wall. The extensive preperitoneal mesh reinforcement open, transabdominal peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic repair or total extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic repair has met with the greatest approval. The extent of the required medial mesh overlap is determined by the distance between the medial defect boundary and the lateral edge of the straight rectus abdominus muscles. The medially directed preperitoneal and retroperitoneal dissection can be extended into the homolateral retrorectus compartment by laterally incising the posterior rectus sheath or by crossing the midline behind the intact linea alba into the contralateral retrorectus compartment. The intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique is a suitable procedure only for smaller defects with possible defect closure but it is also important as an exit strategy in the case of a defective peritoneum. Individualized prehabilitative and preconditioning measures are just as important as the assessment of preoperative anamnestic and clinical findings and risks with radiographic cross-sectional imaging diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
期刊最新文献
[Elective colorectal fast-track resections-Treatment adherence due to coordination by specialized nursing personnel]. [Anal incontinence]. [Impact of the Nursing Personnel Strengthening Act on minimally invasive surgery exemplified by right-sided hemicolectomy from an economic perspective]. [Molecule pathology in the treatment of lung cancer-Interdisciplinary view of the importance in thoracic surgery]. [Is there an indication for thyroidectomy in cases of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1