伊朗东北部呼罗珊省蜱类生物多样性指数及医学意义

Pub Date : 2021-06-30 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.18502/jad.v15i2.7488
Kourosh Arzamani, Abedin Saghafipour, Seyed Ahmad Hashemi, Hassan Vatandoost, Mohammad Alavinia, Saber Raeghi, Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy
{"title":"伊朗东北部呼罗珊省蜱类生物多样性指数及医学意义","authors":"Kourosh Arzamani,&nbsp;Abedin Saghafipour,&nbsp;Seyed Ahmad Hashemi,&nbsp;Hassan Vatandoost,&nbsp;Mohammad Alavinia,&nbsp;Saber Raeghi,&nbsp;Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy","doi":"10.18502/jad.v15i2.7488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ticks are considered as the main vectors for the transmission of various pathogens such as relapsing fever and CCHF to humans. This study was investigated the biodiversity indices and medically importance of ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran during 2015-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Specimens were captured from infested ruminants including cows, sheep, and goats. Additionally, tick collections also were performed on non-domesticated creatures such as turtles, rodents, and hedgehogs. Specimens were identified using valid identification keys. Species diversity, species richness and evenness indices have been calculated to estimate species biodiversity of ticks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1478 adult ticks were collected. The specimens were from two families: <i>Ixodidae</i> (90.05%) and <i>Argasidae</i> (9.95%), 6 genera and 17 species including: <i>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</i> (55.9%), <i>Rhipicephalus bursa</i> (13.4%), <i>Hyalomma marginatum</i> (9.5%), <i>Hyalomma anatolicum</i> (9.5%), <i>Hyalomma asiaticum</i> (0.2%), <i>Hyalomma aegyptium</i> (0.5%), <i>Hyalomma scupense</i> (1.3%), <i>Hyalomma sp</i> (1.2%), <i>Haemaphysalis sulcata</i> (0.7%), <i>Haemaphysalis erinacea</i> (0.1%), <i>Haemaphysalis inermis</i> (0.1%), <i>Haemaphysalis punctata</i> (0.2%), <i>Haemaphysalis concinna</i> (0.1% <i>Boophilus annulatus</i> (1.2), and <i>Dermacentor marginatus</i> (6.1%) among hard ticks as well as <i>Argas persicus</i> (91.8%) and <i>Argas reflexus</i> (8.2%) amongst soft ticks. <i>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</i>, <i>Rh. Bursa, Hy. marginatum</i> and <i>Hy. anatolicum</i> were known as the most frequent species of hard ticks. Tick's species richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson index in this area were S= 17, H'= 1.69, D= 0.294 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on tick distribution veterinary authority, public health organizations and other officials should act for implementation of disease prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/d8/JAD-15-187.PMC8782747.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity Indices and Medically Importance of Ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran.\",\"authors\":\"Kourosh Arzamani,&nbsp;Abedin Saghafipour,&nbsp;Seyed Ahmad Hashemi,&nbsp;Hassan Vatandoost,&nbsp;Mohammad Alavinia,&nbsp;Saber Raeghi,&nbsp;Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jad.v15i2.7488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ticks are considered as the main vectors for the transmission of various pathogens such as relapsing fever and CCHF to humans. This study was investigated the biodiversity indices and medically importance of ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran during 2015-2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Specimens were captured from infested ruminants including cows, sheep, and goats. Additionally, tick collections also were performed on non-domesticated creatures such as turtles, rodents, and hedgehogs. Specimens were identified using valid identification keys. Species diversity, species richness and evenness indices have been calculated to estimate species biodiversity of ticks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1478 adult ticks were collected. The specimens were from two families: <i>Ixodidae</i> (90.05%) and <i>Argasidae</i> (9.95%), 6 genera and 17 species including: <i>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</i> (55.9%), <i>Rhipicephalus bursa</i> (13.4%), <i>Hyalomma marginatum</i> (9.5%), <i>Hyalomma anatolicum</i> (9.5%), <i>Hyalomma asiaticum</i> (0.2%), <i>Hyalomma aegyptium</i> (0.5%), <i>Hyalomma scupense</i> (1.3%), <i>Hyalomma sp</i> (1.2%), <i>Haemaphysalis sulcata</i> (0.7%), <i>Haemaphysalis erinacea</i> (0.1%), <i>Haemaphysalis inermis</i> (0.1%), <i>Haemaphysalis punctata</i> (0.2%), <i>Haemaphysalis concinna</i> (0.1% <i>Boophilus annulatus</i> (1.2), and <i>Dermacentor marginatus</i> (6.1%) among hard ticks as well as <i>Argas persicus</i> (91.8%) and <i>Argas reflexus</i> (8.2%) amongst soft ticks. <i>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</i>, <i>Rh. Bursa, Hy. marginatum</i> and <i>Hy. anatolicum</i> were known as the most frequent species of hard ticks. Tick's species richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson index in this area were S= 17, H'= 1.69, D= 0.294 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on tick distribution veterinary authority, public health organizations and other officials should act for implementation of disease prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/d8/JAD-15-187.PMC8782747.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v15i2.7488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v15i2.7488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蜱被认为是各种病原体(如回归热和CCHF)向人类传播的主要媒介。本研究调查了2015-2019年伊朗东北部呼罗珊省蜱类生物多样性指数及其医学意义。方法:采集奶牛、绵羊、山羊等反刍动物标本。此外,蜱虫收集也进行了非驯化的生物,如乌龟,啮齿动物和刺猬。使用有效的识别密钥对标本进行鉴定。通过计算物种多样性指数、物种丰富度指数和均匀度指数来估计蜱类的物种多样性。结果:共捕获成蜱1478只。标本分属伊蚊科(90.05%)和剑蛾科(9.95%)2科6属17种,其中:血状鼻虫(55.9%)、粘液状鼻虫(13.4%)、边缘透明虫(9.5%)、鸭状鼻虫(9.5%)、亚洲透明虫(0.2%)、埃及透明虫(0.5%)、scupense透明虫(1.3%)、sp透明虫(1.2%)、sulcata血虫(0.7%)、erinacea血虫(0.1%)、inermis血虫(0.1%)、punctata血虫(0.2%)、concinna血虫(0.1%)、Boophilus annulatus(1.2%)、Boophilus annulatus(1.2%)、硬蜱中有边缘革蜱(6.1%),软蜱中有灰蜱(91.8%)和反射灰蜱(8.2%)。Rh.多血棘头猪布氏蜱、边缘蜱和安纳托利蜱是最常见的硬蜱。该地区蜱类物种丰富度、Shannon多样性指数和Simpson指数分别为S= 17、H′= 1.69、D= 0.294。结论:根据蜱虫的分布情况,兽医当局应采取行动,加强疾病预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Biodiversity Indices and Medically Importance of Ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran.

Background: Ticks are considered as the main vectors for the transmission of various pathogens such as relapsing fever and CCHF to humans. This study was investigated the biodiversity indices and medically importance of ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran during 2015-2019.

Methods: Specimens were captured from infested ruminants including cows, sheep, and goats. Additionally, tick collections also were performed on non-domesticated creatures such as turtles, rodents, and hedgehogs. Specimens were identified using valid identification keys. Species diversity, species richness and evenness indices have been calculated to estimate species biodiversity of ticks.

Results: A total of 1478 adult ticks were collected. The specimens were from two families: Ixodidae (90.05%) and Argasidae (9.95%), 6 genera and 17 species including: Rhipicephalus sanguineus (55.9%), Rhipicephalus bursa (13.4%), Hyalomma marginatum (9.5%), Hyalomma anatolicum (9.5%), Hyalomma asiaticum (0.2%), Hyalomma aegyptium (0.5%), Hyalomma scupense (1.3%), Hyalomma sp (1.2%), Haemaphysalis sulcata (0.7%), Haemaphysalis erinacea (0.1%), Haemaphysalis inermis (0.1%), Haemaphysalis punctata (0.2%), Haemaphysalis concinna (0.1% Boophilus annulatus (1.2), and Dermacentor marginatus (6.1%) among hard ticks as well as Argas persicus (91.8%) and Argas reflexus (8.2%) amongst soft ticks. Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rh. Bursa, Hy. marginatum and Hy. anatolicum were known as the most frequent species of hard ticks. Tick's species richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson index in this area were S= 17, H'= 1.69, D= 0.294 respectively.

Conclusion: Based on tick distribution veterinary authority, public health organizations and other officials should act for implementation of disease prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1