IF 1.5 4区 医学Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINEPediatric dentistryPub Date : 2021-11-15
Stacy Michels, Naveen Bansal, Colleen Greene
{"title":"全麻下牙科康复后随访时间建议的影响。","authors":"Stacy Michels, Naveen Bansal, Colleen Greene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i><b>Purpose:</b></i> Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. <i><b>Methods:</b></i> The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. <i><b>Results:</b></i> The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). <i><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"43 6","pages":"470-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Follow-Up Visit Timing Recommendations After Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Michels, Naveen Bansal, Colleen Greene\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i><b>Purpose:</b></i> Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. <i><b>Methods:</b></i> The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. <i><b>Results:</b></i> The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). <i><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"470-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Follow-Up Visit Timing Recommendations After Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia.
Purpose: Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. Methods: The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. Results: The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). Conclusion: Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.