全麻下牙科康复后随访时间建议的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2021-11-15
Stacy Michels, Naveen Bansal, Colleen Greene
{"title":"全麻下牙科康复后随访时间建议的影响。","authors":"Stacy Michels,&nbsp;Naveen Bansal,&nbsp;Colleen Greene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i><b>Purpose:</b></i> Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. <i><b>Methods:</b></i> The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. <i><b>Results:</b></i> The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). <i><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"43 6","pages":"470-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Follow-Up Visit Timing Recommendations After Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Michels,&nbsp;Naveen Bansal,&nbsp;Colleen Greene\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i><b>Purpose:</b></i> Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. <i><b>Methods:</b></i> The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. <i><b>Results:</b></i> The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). <i><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"43 6\",\"pages\":\"470-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全麻下牙科康复(DRGA)越来越多地应用于儿科牙医。drga后的随访和持续的召回率较低。目前没有关于最佳DRGA随访时间建议的指南或发表的研究。在威斯康星州儿童牙科中心进行了一项质量改进计划,以提高drga后的随访率。本研究的目的是评估在全麻随访下采用两周访视建议而不是六周随访间隔后随访依从性的变化。方法:DRGA随访建议由术后6周改为术后2周。通过17个月的随访,评估实施前后回忆考试的出勤率(n = 544)。然后根据年龄、特殊保健需求、寄养状况和龋齿复发率进行比较。结果:干预提高了各年龄段患者的DRGA随访依从性(p)。结论:将全麻下牙科康复随访时间由6周改为2周,提高了患者随访6个月的依从性,减少了总体失访人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Follow-Up Visit Timing Recommendations After Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia.

Purpose: Dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is performed increasingly by pediatric dentists. Follow-up visits and ongoing recall attendance are shown to be low post-DRGA. There is currently no guideline or published study on optimal DRGA follow-up timing recommendations. A quality improvement initiative was performed at Children's Dental Center of Children's Wisconsin to increase the rate of follow-up post-DRGA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in follow-up compliance after implementing a two-week visit recommendation instead of a six-week interval for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up. Methods: The DRGA follow-up visit recommendation was changed from six weeks to two weeks postsurgery. Attendance rates for recall exams were evaluated before and after implementation with 17 months follow-up (n equals 544). Attendance was then compared by age, special health care needs, foster care status, and caries recurrence. Results: The intervention improved compliance with DRGA follow-up for all ages (P<0.001) and six-month recall visits for ages zero to five (83.3 percent of cases, P=0.001). Patients were more likely to return for any visit within 17 months in the two-week follow-up group compared to the six-week group (P=0.002). There was no difference in caries recurrence requiring treatment between the two follow-up timing groups (P=0.86). Conclusion: Changing the dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia follow-up from six weeks to two weeks improved compliance through six months and decreased the overall number of patients lost to follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric dentistry
Pediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINEPEDIATRI-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite and Glass Hybrid Restoration for Molars Affected by Molar Hypomineralization. Oral Health in the Down Syndrome Population: Parental Perceptions on Dental Care in the United States. Early Introduction of Total Sugar Foods and Early Childhood Caries. Articaine Infiltration Versus Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Mandibular Molars: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pre-, Peri-, and Postnatal Risk for the Development of Enamel Defects in Permanent Dentition: A Birth Cohort in Southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1