{"title":"呼气末肺容量与PaO2引导下PEEP测定对中重度ARDS呼吸力学和氧合的影响。","authors":"Kazim Rollas, Pervin Hanci, Arzu Topeli","doi":"10.1080/01902148.2021.2021326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no ideal method for determination of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. We compared the effects of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)-guided versus PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during the first 48 hours in moderate to severe ARDS.</p><p><p>Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe ARDS admitted to an academic medical ICU were assigned to PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided (<i>n</i> = 11) or to EELV-guided PEEP determination (<i>n</i> = 11) group. First, an incremental PEEP trial was performed by increasing PEEP by 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O steps from 8 to 20 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and in each step EELV and lung mechanics were measured in both groups. Then, oxygenation and respiratory mechanics were measured under the determined PEEP at 4, 12, 24, and 48th hours.</p><p><p>After the incremental PEEP trial, over the 48 hours of the study period, in the EELV-guided group PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increased (<i>p</i> = 0.04 and <i>p</i> = 0.02; respectively), whereas they did not change in PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided group (<i>p</i> = 0.09 and <i>p</i> = 0.27; respectively). In all patients, the median value of EELV change (ΔEELV) during incremental PEEP trial was 25%. In patients with ΔEELV > 25% (<i>n</i> = 11) PaO<sub>2</sub>, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> and Cs increased over time in 48 hours (<i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < 0.01, and <i>p</i> = 0.04; respectively), whereas they did not change in those with ΔEELV ≤ 25% (<i>n</i> = 11) (<i>p</i> = 0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.51, and <i>p</i> = 0.73; respectively).</p><p><p>Compared to PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided PEEP determination, EELV-guided PEEP determination resulted in greater improvement in oxygenation over time. Patients who had > 25% improvement in EELV during a PEEP trial had greater improvement in oxygenation and compliance over 48 hours.</p><p><p>Supplemental data for this article is available online at.</p>","PeriodicalId":12206,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Lung Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"12-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of end-expiratory lung volume versus PaO<sub>2</sub> guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in moderate to severe ARDS.\",\"authors\":\"Kazim Rollas, Pervin Hanci, Arzu Topeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01902148.2021.2021326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is no ideal method for determination of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. We compared the effects of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)-guided versus PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during the first 48 hours in moderate to severe ARDS.</p><p><p>Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe ARDS admitted to an academic medical ICU were assigned to PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided (<i>n</i> = 11) or to EELV-guided PEEP determination (<i>n</i> = 11) group. First, an incremental PEEP trial was performed by increasing PEEP by 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O steps from 8 to 20 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and in each step EELV and lung mechanics were measured in both groups. Then, oxygenation and respiratory mechanics were measured under the determined PEEP at 4, 12, 24, and 48th hours.</p><p><p>After the incremental PEEP trial, over the 48 hours of the study period, in the EELV-guided group PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> increased (<i>p</i> = 0.04 and <i>p</i> = 0.02; respectively), whereas they did not change in PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided group (<i>p</i> = 0.09 and <i>p</i> = 0.27; respectively). In all patients, the median value of EELV change (ΔEELV) during incremental PEEP trial was 25%. In patients with ΔEELV > 25% (<i>n</i> = 11) PaO<sub>2</sub>, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> and Cs increased over time in 48 hours (<i>p</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < 0.01, and <i>p</i> = 0.04; respectively), whereas they did not change in those with ΔEELV ≤ 25% (<i>n</i> = 11) (<i>p</i> = 0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.51, and <i>p</i> = 0.73; respectively).</p><p><p>Compared to PaO<sub>2</sub>-guided PEEP determination, EELV-guided PEEP determination resulted in greater improvement in oxygenation over time. Patients who had > 25% improvement in EELV during a PEEP trial had greater improvement in oxygenation and compliance over 48 hours.</p><p><p>Supplemental data for this article is available online at.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Lung Research\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"12-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Lung Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01902148.2021.2021326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Lung Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01902148.2021.2021326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of end-expiratory lung volume versus PaO2 guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in moderate to severe ARDS.
There is no ideal method for determination of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. We compared the effects of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)-guided versus PaO2-guided PEEP determination on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation during the first 48 hours in moderate to severe ARDS.
Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe ARDS admitted to an academic medical ICU were assigned to PaO2-guided (n = 11) or to EELV-guided PEEP determination (n = 11) group. First, an incremental PEEP trial was performed by increasing PEEP by 3 cmH2O steps from 8 to 20 cmH2O and in each step EELV and lung mechanics were measured in both groups. Then, oxygenation and respiratory mechanics were measured under the determined PEEP at 4, 12, 24, and 48th hours.
After the incremental PEEP trial, over the 48 hours of the study period, in the EELV-guided group PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 increased (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02; respectively), whereas they did not change in PaO2-guided group (p = 0.09 and p = 0.27; respectively). In all patients, the median value of EELV change (ΔEELV) during incremental PEEP trial was 25%. In patients with ΔEELV > 25% (n = 11) PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 and Cs increased over time in 48 hours (p = 0.03, p < 0.01, and p = 0.04; respectively), whereas they did not change in those with ΔEELV ≤ 25% (n = 11) (p = 0.73, p = 0.51, and p = 0.73; respectively).
Compared to PaO2-guided PEEP determination, EELV-guided PEEP determination resulted in greater improvement in oxygenation over time. Patients who had > 25% improvement in EELV during a PEEP trial had greater improvement in oxygenation and compliance over 48 hours.
Supplemental data for this article is available online at.
期刊介绍：
Experimental Lung Research publishes original articles in all fields of respiratory tract anatomy, biology, developmental biology, toxicology, and pathology. Emphasis is placed on investigations concerned with molecular, biochemical, and cellular mechanisms of normal function, pathogenesis, and responses to injury. The journal publishes reports on important methodological advances on new experimental modes. Also published are invited reviews on important and timely research advances, as well as proceedings of specialized symposia.
Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
