基于智能手机的助听器应用的电声评估。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-08 DOI:10.21053/ceo.2021.01004
Willy Nguyen, Miseung Koo, Jun Ho Lee, Seung-Ha Oh, Moo Kyun Park
{"title":"基于智能手机的助听器应用的电声评估。","authors":"Willy Nguyen,&nbsp;Miseung Koo,&nbsp;Jun Ho Lee,&nbsp;Seung-Ha Oh,&nbsp;Moo Kyun Park","doi":"10.21053/ceo.2021.01004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the electroacoustic characteristics of smartphone-based hearing aid applications (apps).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated hearing aid apps based on processing delay measurements, hearing instrument testing, simulated real ear measurements, and a head-and-torso simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many apps exceeded the recommended level for processing delay. Hearing instrument testing showed the highest amplification characteristics and the best sound quality when a hearing aid was used, followed by the high-end apps and then the low-end apps. The simulated real ear measurements results showed that the high-end apps had a better ability to match the amplification targets than the low-end apps, but there was no consistent pattern among apps when controlling the output. Only a few apps could improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the head-and-torso simulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the apps showed relatively poor electroacoustic performance in comparison with hearing aids. Generalizing access to hearing care through hearing aid apps induces a wide diversity of hearing performance with no fixed standard for reliability. However, we expect their overall quality to improve over the next few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10318,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/1a/ceo-2021-01004.PMC9149231.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroacoustic Evaluation of Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Applications.\",\"authors\":\"Willy Nguyen,&nbsp;Miseung Koo,&nbsp;Jun Ho Lee,&nbsp;Seung-Ha Oh,&nbsp;Moo Kyun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.21053/ceo.2021.01004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the electroacoustic characteristics of smartphone-based hearing aid applications (apps).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated hearing aid apps based on processing delay measurements, hearing instrument testing, simulated real ear measurements, and a head-and-torso simulator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many apps exceeded the recommended level for processing delay. Hearing instrument testing showed the highest amplification characteristics and the best sound quality when a hearing aid was used, followed by the high-end apps and then the low-end apps. The simulated real ear measurements results showed that the high-end apps had a better ability to match the amplification targets than the low-end apps, but there was no consistent pattern among apps when controlling the output. Only a few apps could improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the head-and-torso simulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the apps showed relatively poor electroacoustic performance in comparison with hearing aids. Generalizing access to hearing care through hearing aid apps induces a wide diversity of hearing performance with no fixed standard for reliability. However, we expect their overall quality to improve over the next few years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/1a/ceo-2021-01004.PMC9149231.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2021.01004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2021.01004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究评估了基于智能手机的助听器应用程序的电声特性。方法:我们调查了基于处理延迟测量、助听器测试、模拟真实耳朵测量和头部躯干模拟器的助听器应用程序。结果:许多应用程序超过了建议的处理延迟水平。助听器测试显示,使用助听器时的放大特性和音质最高,其次是高端应用程序,然后是低端应用程序。模拟实耳测量结果表明,高端应用程序比低端应用程序具有更好的放大目标匹配能力,但在控制输出时,应用程序之间没有一致的模式。只有少数几个应用程序可以提高头部和躯干模拟器的信噪比。结论:与助听器相比,大多数应用程序的电声性能相对较差。通过助听器应用程序来普及听力保健,导致了听力表现的广泛多样性,没有固定的可靠性标准。然而,我们预计他们的整体质量将在未来几年内得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electroacoustic Evaluation of Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Applications.

Objectives: This study evaluated the electroacoustic characteristics of smartphone-based hearing aid applications (apps).

Methods: We investigated hearing aid apps based on processing delay measurements, hearing instrument testing, simulated real ear measurements, and a head-and-torso simulator.

Results: Many apps exceeded the recommended level for processing delay. Hearing instrument testing showed the highest amplification characteristics and the best sound quality when a hearing aid was used, followed by the high-end apps and then the low-end apps. The simulated real ear measurements results showed that the high-end apps had a better ability to match the amplification targets than the low-end apps, but there was no consistent pattern among apps when controlling the output. Only a few apps could improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the head-and-torso simulator.

Conclusion: Most of the apps showed relatively poor electroacoustic performance in comparison with hearing aids. Generalizing access to hearing care through hearing aid apps induces a wide diversity of hearing performance with no fixed standard for reliability. However, we expect their overall quality to improve over the next few years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology (Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, CEO) is an international peer-reviewed journal on recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and dedicated to the advancement of patient care in ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders. This journal publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic researches, reviews, and clinical trials, encompassing the whole topics of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery. CEO was first issued in 2008 and this journal is published in English four times (the last day of February, May, August, and November) per year by the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The Journal aims at publishing evidence-based, scientifically written articles from different disciplines of otorhinolaryngology field. The readership contains clinical/basic research into current practice in otorhinolaryngology, audiology, speech pathology, head and neck oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The readers are otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons and oncologists, audiologists, and speech pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Video Head Impulse Test Coherence Predicts Vertigo Recovery in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Vertigo. Long-term Assessment of Speech and Swallowing Function in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer Patients After J-Flap Reconstruction. Clinical significance of gross extrathyroidal extension to only the strap muscle according to tumor size in differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Consensus Statement: Postoperative Management after Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube. Therapeutic Effectiveness SNOT 22-based interdose interval adjustment of dupilumab for CRSwNP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1