彩鬼蟹(cypode gaudichaudii)觅食策略的可塑性对原位食物资源操纵实验的响应

IF 1.4 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Zoological Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.6620/ZS.2021.60-37
Adeline Y P Yong, Shirley S L Lim
{"title":"彩鬼蟹(cypode gaudichaudii)觅食策略的可塑性对原位食物资源操纵实验的响应","authors":"Adeline Y P Yong,&nbsp;Shirley S L Lim","doi":"10.6620/ZS.2021.60-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The feeding strategies of <i>Ocypode gaudichaudii</i> at two sandy beaches, Culebra Beach (CB) and Playa Venao (PV) in Panama, were studied via three experiments. Two separate manipulative <i>in situ</i> experiments were conducted to determine how the densities of food resources and the size of the supplemented food offered to the crabs can affect their diet and food handling behavior. The third experiment, a transplantation study, was also conducted to determine the plasticity of the feeding behavior of the displaced crabs. In the first experiment, freshly-emerged crabs showed different feeding modes when washed-sediment was seeded with different densities of diatoms and rove beetles, which suggests that they are optimal foragers. Crabs hoarded food in the second experiment when food augmentation was performed, in which small and large food pellets were placed around the burrows at the beginning and end of the crabs' feeding cycle. All freshly-emerged crabs from both sites foraged on the small pellets outside their burrows and did not cache food; when pellets were provided at the end of the feeding cycle, crabs from CB fed on some of the small pellets and returned to their burrows with the uneaten pellets left on the surface, whereas crabs at PV picked up all the small food pellets and transferred them into their burrows over several trips before plugging their burrow entrances. Only the crabs from PV carried the large food pellets supplemented at the start and end of the feeding cycle into their burrows. In contrast, the crabs at CB often left behind the partially-eaten pellets on the sand surface, probably due to the increased risk of predation associated with the prolonged handling time of the large food pellets. Excavation of the burrows of the crabs that hoarded food showed that all the pellets were deposited at the bend of the burrows, indicating that they were not consumed immediately. Crabs that fed in droves at PV stopped droving and foraged around their burrows after being transplanted to CB. This is the first documentation of food hoarding in a sandy beach macroinvertebrate at a resource-impoverished habitat. The plasticity of feeding strategies adopted by the painted ghost crab in response to different densities of food resources in the habitat could be an adaptation to the dynamic sandy beach environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49331,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Studies","volume":"60 ","pages":"e37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662320/pdf/zoolstud-60-037.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasticity of Foraging Strategies Adopted by the Painted Ghost Crab, <i>Ocypode gaudichaudii</i>, in Response to <i>in situ</i> Food Resource Manipulation Experiments.\",\"authors\":\"Adeline Y P Yong,&nbsp;Shirley S L Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.6620/ZS.2021.60-37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The feeding strategies of <i>Ocypode gaudichaudii</i> at two sandy beaches, Culebra Beach (CB) and Playa Venao (PV) in Panama, were studied via three experiments. Two separate manipulative <i>in situ</i> experiments were conducted to determine how the densities of food resources and the size of the supplemented food offered to the crabs can affect their diet and food handling behavior. The third experiment, a transplantation study, was also conducted to determine the plasticity of the feeding behavior of the displaced crabs. In the first experiment, freshly-emerged crabs showed different feeding modes when washed-sediment was seeded with different densities of diatoms and rove beetles, which suggests that they are optimal foragers. Crabs hoarded food in the second experiment when food augmentation was performed, in which small and large food pellets were placed around the burrows at the beginning and end of the crabs' feeding cycle. All freshly-emerged crabs from both sites foraged on the small pellets outside their burrows and did not cache food; when pellets were provided at the end of the feeding cycle, crabs from CB fed on some of the small pellets and returned to their burrows with the uneaten pellets left on the surface, whereas crabs at PV picked up all the small food pellets and transferred them into their burrows over several trips before plugging their burrow entrances. Only the crabs from PV carried the large food pellets supplemented at the start and end of the feeding cycle into their burrows. In contrast, the crabs at CB often left behind the partially-eaten pellets on the sand surface, probably due to the increased risk of predation associated with the prolonged handling time of the large food pellets. Excavation of the burrows of the crabs that hoarded food showed that all the pellets were deposited at the bend of the burrows, indicating that they were not consumed immediately. Crabs that fed in droves at PV stopped droving and foraged around their burrows after being transplanted to CB. This is the first documentation of food hoarding in a sandy beach macroinvertebrate at a resource-impoverished habitat. The plasticity of feeding strategies adopted by the painted ghost crab in response to different densities of food resources in the habitat could be an adaptation to the dynamic sandy beach environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoological Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"e37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662320/pdf/zoolstud-60-037.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2021.60-37\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2021.60-37","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

通过3个实验研究了高尾足虫在巴拿马Culebra Beach (CB)和Playa Venao (PV)两个沙滩上的摄食策略。进行了两次单独的原位操纵实验,以确定食物资源的密度和提供给螃蟹的补充食物的大小如何影响它们的饮食和食物处理行为。第三个实验,移植研究,也进行了确定迁移螃蟹摄食行为的可塑性。在第一个实验中,当在冲洗沉积物中播种不同密度的硅藻和甲虫时,新生螃蟹表现出不同的进食模式,这表明它们是最佳的觅食者。在第二个实验中,螃蟹在进行食物增强时囤积食物,在螃蟹摄食周期的开始和结束时,在洞穴周围放置大小食物颗粒。这两个地点的所有新出蟹都以洞穴外的小颗粒为食,没有储存食物;当喂食周期结束时提供颗粒时,CB组的螃蟹吃了一些小颗粒,并将未吃完的颗粒留在表面返回洞穴,而PV组的螃蟹则捡起所有小食物颗粒,并在几次旅行中将它们转移到洞穴中,然后堵塞洞穴入口。只有来自PV的螃蟹将在喂食周期开始和结束时补充的大食物颗粒携带到它们的洞穴中。相比之下,CB的螃蟹通常会将部分吃完的食物颗粒留在沙面上,这可能是由于大食物颗粒的处理时间延长而增加了被捕食的风险。对储存食物的螃蟹洞穴的挖掘表明,所有的颗粒都存放在洞穴的弯曲处,这表明它们没有立即被吃掉。成群结队在PV觅食的螃蟹在移植到CB后停止了成群结队地在洞穴周围觅食。这是在一个资源贫乏的栖息地的沙滩大型无脊椎动物的食物囤积的第一个文件。彩鬼蟹对生境中不同食物资源密度所采取的摄食策略的可塑性可能是对动态沙滩环境的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plasticity of Foraging Strategies Adopted by the Painted Ghost Crab, Ocypode gaudichaudii, in Response to in situ Food Resource Manipulation Experiments.

The feeding strategies of Ocypode gaudichaudii at two sandy beaches, Culebra Beach (CB) and Playa Venao (PV) in Panama, were studied via three experiments. Two separate manipulative in situ experiments were conducted to determine how the densities of food resources and the size of the supplemented food offered to the crabs can affect their diet and food handling behavior. The third experiment, a transplantation study, was also conducted to determine the plasticity of the feeding behavior of the displaced crabs. In the first experiment, freshly-emerged crabs showed different feeding modes when washed-sediment was seeded with different densities of diatoms and rove beetles, which suggests that they are optimal foragers. Crabs hoarded food in the second experiment when food augmentation was performed, in which small and large food pellets were placed around the burrows at the beginning and end of the crabs' feeding cycle. All freshly-emerged crabs from both sites foraged on the small pellets outside their burrows and did not cache food; when pellets were provided at the end of the feeding cycle, crabs from CB fed on some of the small pellets and returned to their burrows with the uneaten pellets left on the surface, whereas crabs at PV picked up all the small food pellets and transferred them into their burrows over several trips before plugging their burrow entrances. Only the crabs from PV carried the large food pellets supplemented at the start and end of the feeding cycle into their burrows. In contrast, the crabs at CB often left behind the partially-eaten pellets on the sand surface, probably due to the increased risk of predation associated with the prolonged handling time of the large food pellets. Excavation of the burrows of the crabs that hoarded food showed that all the pellets were deposited at the bend of the burrows, indicating that they were not consumed immediately. Crabs that fed in droves at PV stopped droving and foraged around their burrows after being transplanted to CB. This is the first documentation of food hoarding in a sandy beach macroinvertebrate at a resource-impoverished habitat. The plasticity of feeding strategies adopted by the painted ghost crab in response to different densities of food resources in the habitat could be an adaptation to the dynamic sandy beach environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoological Studies
Zoological Studies 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoological Studies publishes original research papers in five major fields: Animal Behavior, Comparative Physiology, Evolution, Ecology, and Systematics and Biogeography. Manuscripts are welcome from around the world and must be written in English. When the manuscript concerns the use of animals or specimens in research, a statement must be included to the effect that the author(s) has adhered to the legal requirements of the country in which the work was carried out or to any institutional guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Three New Cryptic Species of the Freshwater Shrimp Genus Caridina (Decapoda: Caridea: Atyidae) from Hong Kong, with Notes on the C. serrata Species Group. Descriptions of Two New Species of the Cyprinid Genus Hongshuia (Pisces: Cypriniformes) from the Pearl River Basin, Southwest China, with a Re-evaluation of the Taxonomic Status of H. paoli. Effects of Blue Light and Feeding on the Physiological Performance of Reef Corals, Stylophora pistillata and Pocillopora damicornis. Dry Season Feeding Profiles of a Characiformes Assemblage in a Brazilian Tropical Stream. Spatiotemporal, Microhabitat, and Climatic Variance in Disjunct Populations of Co-occurring Pinyon-Juniper Woodland Dwelling Chipmunks and Brushmice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1