亚克力连杆插针数量和位置的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 Veterinary Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Claire Leriquier, Florence Audet-Robin, Guy Beauchamp, Xavier Montasell
{"title":"亚克力连杆插针数量和位置的影响。","authors":"Claire Leriquier,&nbsp;Florence Audet-Robin,&nbsp;Guy Beauchamp,&nbsp;Xavier Montasell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acrylic columns are commonly used in external skeletal fixators, especially for fracture management or trans-articular fixations. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating if the number or position of the transfixation pins influence the ultimate strength and stiffness of the acrylic column. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the number and position of transfixation pins (concentric <i>versus</i> eccentric) on the strength and stiffness of acrylic columns placed in axial compression. We hypothesized that strength and stiffness of acrylic columns under axial compression would not be affected by the number or position of the transfixation pins through the column. Three different groups of 12 acrylic columns were constructed with 4, 6, and 8 pins. In each group, 6 columns were constructed with the pins placed concentrically and the remaining 6 columns with the pins placed eccentrically. Each column was then placed under axial compression using a biomechanical testing machine. No significant differences were observed in ultimate strength regarding the number or position of transfixation pins (<i>P</i> = 0.83 and <i>P</i> = 0.27, respectively). However, stiffness was significantly decreased for columns with 4 eccentric pins compared with columns with 6 and 8 eccentric pins (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and with columns with 4 concentric pins (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although the effects of transfixation pins on the rigidity of acrylic columns do not appear to be clinically significant, these tests were performed only in compression and results might differ if complete external fixator systems are used with different models of testing. Future studies are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9550,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","volume":" ","pages":"35-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697316/pdf/cjvr_01_35.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the number and the position of transfixation pins in acrylic connecting bars.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Leriquier,&nbsp;Florence Audet-Robin,&nbsp;Guy Beauchamp,&nbsp;Xavier Montasell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acrylic columns are commonly used in external skeletal fixators, especially for fracture management or trans-articular fixations. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating if the number or position of the transfixation pins influence the ultimate strength and stiffness of the acrylic column. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the number and position of transfixation pins (concentric <i>versus</i> eccentric) on the strength and stiffness of acrylic columns placed in axial compression. We hypothesized that strength and stiffness of acrylic columns under axial compression would not be affected by the number or position of the transfixation pins through the column. Three different groups of 12 acrylic columns were constructed with 4, 6, and 8 pins. In each group, 6 columns were constructed with the pins placed concentrically and the remaining 6 columns with the pins placed eccentrically. Each column was then placed under axial compression using a biomechanical testing machine. No significant differences were observed in ultimate strength regarding the number or position of transfixation pins (<i>P</i> = 0.83 and <i>P</i> = 0.27, respectively). However, stiffness was significantly decreased for columns with 4 eccentric pins compared with columns with 6 and 8 eccentric pins (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and with columns with 4 concentric pins (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although the effects of transfixation pins on the rigidity of acrylic columns do not appear to be clinically significant, these tests were performed only in compression and results might differ if complete external fixator systems are used with different models of testing. Future studies are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"35-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697316/pdf/cjvr_01_35.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丙烯酸柱通常用于骨骼外固定架,特别是骨折管理或经关节固定。据作者所知,没有研究表明,如果穿孔销的数量或位置影响丙烯酸柱的极限强度和刚度。本研究的目的是评估穿针的数量和位置(同心与偏心)对轴向压缩丙烯酸柱的强度和刚度的影响。我们假设亚克力柱在轴压下的强度和刚度不会受到贯穿柱的插针数量或位置的影响。三组不同的12个丙烯酸柱由4、6和8个销钉组成。在每组中,6个柱以同心放置销,其余6个柱以偏心放置销。然后使用生物力学试验机将每个柱置于轴向压缩下。在最终强度方面,穿针的数量和位置没有显著差异(P = 0.83和P = 0.27)。然而,与6、8偏心销柱和4同心销柱相比,4偏心销柱的刚度显著降低(P < 0.01)。虽然穿针对丙烯酸柱刚性的影响在临床上似乎没有显著意义,但这些测试仅在压缩情况下进行,如果使用完整的外固定架系统进行不同模型的测试,结果可能会有所不同。建议将来进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the number and the position of transfixation pins in acrylic connecting bars.

Acrylic columns are commonly used in external skeletal fixators, especially for fracture management or trans-articular fixations. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies demonstrating if the number or position of the transfixation pins influence the ultimate strength and stiffness of the acrylic column. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the number and position of transfixation pins (concentric versus eccentric) on the strength and stiffness of acrylic columns placed in axial compression. We hypothesized that strength and stiffness of acrylic columns under axial compression would not be affected by the number or position of the transfixation pins through the column. Three different groups of 12 acrylic columns were constructed with 4, 6, and 8 pins. In each group, 6 columns were constructed with the pins placed concentrically and the remaining 6 columns with the pins placed eccentrically. Each column was then placed under axial compression using a biomechanical testing machine. No significant differences were observed in ultimate strength regarding the number or position of transfixation pins (P = 0.83 and P = 0.27, respectively). However, stiffness was significantly decreased for columns with 4 eccentric pins compared with columns with 6 and 8 eccentric pins (P < 0.01) and with columns with 4 concentric pins (P < 0.001). Although the effects of transfixation pins on the rigidity of acrylic columns do not appear to be clinically significant, these tests were performed only in compression and results might differ if complete external fixator systems are used with different models of testing. Future studies are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, published by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association, is Canada''s only veterinary research publication. This quarterly peer-reviewed online-only journal has earned a wide international readership through the publishing of high quality scientific papers in the field of veterinary medicine. The Journal publishes the results of original research in veterinary and comparative medicine.
期刊最新文献
Changing of the guard: Exits from and entrances to the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association Editorial Committee. Greetings from the new CJVR Editor. Iliopsoas strain demographics, concurrent injuries, and grade determined by musculoskeletal ultrasound in 72 agility dogs. Comparison of two ratios of xylazine:ketamine for the anesthesia of free-ranging North American beavers (Castor canadensis) in a remote setting. Relationship between the degree of stifle flexion and the proximal patellofemoral angle in the sagittal plane: A radiographic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1