左翼威权主义的奇特案例:当威权主义者遇到反威权主义规范时

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI:10.1002/jts5.108
Lucian Gideon Conway III, James D. McFarland, Thomas H. Costello, Scott O. Lilienfeld
{"title":"左翼威权主义的奇特案例:当威权主义者遇到反威权主义规范时","authors":"Lucian Gideon Conway III,&nbsp;James D. McFarland,&nbsp;Thomas H. Costello,&nbsp;Scott O. Lilienfeld","doi":"10.1002/jts5.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives by proposing that ideologically based authoritarian <i>norms</i> are sometimes in conflict with the processes that create authoritarian <i>individuals</i>. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms <i>are</i> more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian attributes can occur in both conservatives <i>and</i> liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in <i>conflict</i>. We review existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by considering the model's place in current research on the complexities of ideology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 4","pages":"423-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.108","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The curious case of left-wing authoritarianism: When authoritarian persons meet anti-authoritarian norms\",\"authors\":\"Lucian Gideon Conway III,&nbsp;James D. McFarland,&nbsp;Thomas H. Costello,&nbsp;Scott O. Lilienfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts5.108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives by proposing that ideologically based authoritarian <i>norms</i> are sometimes in conflict with the processes that create authoritarian <i>individuals</i>. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms <i>are</i> more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian attributes can occur in both conservatives <i>and</i> liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in <i>conflict</i>. We review existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by considering the model's place in current research on the complexities of ideology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"423-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.108\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

左翼威权主义(LWA)在心理学上有着争议的历史。一些研究人员对LWA的存在表示怀疑,而另一些人则认为LWA是一个有效的结构。在本文中,我们通过提出基于意识形态的专制规范有时与创造专制个体的过程相冲突,提供了一个框架来调和这两种观点。在西方政治背景下,威权主义规范更有可能出现在政治光谱的保守一方;但威权主义的特质可能出现在保守派和自由派身上。因此,在我们的模型中,左翼威权主义者经常占据影响威权主义的力量发生冲突的空间。我们回顾了与模型相关的现有证据,提出了与模型相关的新证据,从模型中得出了四个假设,并讨论了模型证伪的标准。最后,我们考虑了该模型在当前意识形态复杂性研究中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The curious case of left-wing authoritarianism: When authoritarian persons meet anti-authoritarian norms

Left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) has a controversial history in psychology. Some researchers have expressed skepticism about the existence of LWA, whereas others have argued that LWA is a valid construct. In the present article, we offer a framework to reconcile these two perspectives by proposing that ideologically based authoritarian norms are sometimes in conflict with the processes that create authoritarian individuals. In Western political contexts, authoritarian norms are more likely to occur on the conservative side of the political spectrum; but authoritarian attributes can occur in both conservatives and liberals. In our model, left-wing authoritarians thus often occupy the space where forces influencing authoritarianism are in conflict. We review existing evidence related to the model, present novel evidence related to the model, derive four hypotheses from the model, and discuss criteria for falsifying the model. We conclude by considering the model's place in current research on the complexities of ideology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Differential Pattern of Consequences of Self-Compassion Across Gender Individual and Contextual Factors Associated With the Prevention of Corruption: A Qualitative Study Among Iranian Public Employees Navigating the Role of Emotional Health and Positive Life Outlook on Work-Life Balance in Professional Married Women Atmosphere at Briefing Sessions and Its Influence on Local Residents’ Intention to Participate in Discussion Exploring the (Mal)adaptive Consequences of Self-Deceptive Enhancement: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1