Thaís Uenoyama Dezem, Ademir Franco, Carlos Eduardo Machado Palhares, Alexandre Raphael Deitos, Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva, Bianca Marques Santiago, Isabella Lima Arrais Ribeiro, Eduardo Daruge Junior
{"title":"巴西亚成人和成人x线片牙龄估计的Olze和time方法测试。","authors":"Thaís Uenoyama Dezem, Ademir Franco, Carlos Eduardo Machado Palhares, Alexandre Raphael Deitos, Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva, Bianca Marques Santiago, Isabella Lima Arrais Ribeiro, Eduardo Daruge Junior","doi":"10.15644/asc55/4/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to test the applicability of the methods proposed by Olze et al. (2012) and Timme et al. for dental age estimation in Brazilian subadults and adults.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs of 503 individuals aged between 20 and 70 years were analyzed. The mean chronological age of males and females of the sample was 29.04 and 29.97 years, receptively. Secondary dentin formation, cementum apposition, periodontal recession, and attrition of teeth #34, #35, #44 and #45 teeth were assessed as parameters to be calculated in the formulae designed by Olze et al. and Timme et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In males, the mean estimated age by the Olze method was 28.97 ± 2.86 years, while in females it was 27.85 ± 2.70 years. The Timme method estimated mean age for males of 32.54 ± 5.32 years and for females 33.09 ± 5.16 years. Low coefficients of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) for the application of tooth-specific formulae of both methods suggest that estimated and chronological ages were not properly associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of this study indicate that the Olze and Timme methods may be limited for forensic applications in Brazilian subadults and adults. Country-specific statistical adjustments might be useful for improvements in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/70/ASC_55(4)_390-396.PMC8734453.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Olze and Timme Methods for Dental Age Estimation in Radiographs of Brazilian Subadults and Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Thaís Uenoyama Dezem, Ademir Franco, Carlos Eduardo Machado Palhares, Alexandre Raphael Deitos, Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva, Bianca Marques Santiago, Isabella Lima Arrais Ribeiro, Eduardo Daruge Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.15644/asc55/4/6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to test the applicability of the methods proposed by Olze et al. (2012) and Timme et al. for dental age estimation in Brazilian subadults and adults.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Panoramic radiographs of 503 individuals aged between 20 and 70 years were analyzed. The mean chronological age of males and females of the sample was 29.04 and 29.97 years, receptively. Secondary dentin formation, cementum apposition, periodontal recession, and attrition of teeth #34, #35, #44 and #45 teeth were assessed as parameters to be calculated in the formulae designed by Olze et al. and Timme et al.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In males, the mean estimated age by the Olze method was 28.97 ± 2.86 years, while in females it was 27.85 ± 2.70 years. The Timme method estimated mean age for males of 32.54 ± 5.32 years and for females 33.09 ± 5.16 years. Low coefficients of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) for the application of tooth-specific formulae of both methods suggest that estimated and chronological ages were not properly associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of this study indicate that the Olze and Timme methods may be limited for forensic applications in Brazilian subadults and adults. Country-specific statistical adjustments might be useful for improvements in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/70/ASC_55(4)_390-396.PMC8734453.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/4/6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/4/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:本研究旨在检验Olze et al.(2012)和Timme et al.等人提出的方法在巴西亚成人和成人牙齿年龄估计中的适用性。材料与方法:对503例年龄在20 ~ 70岁的人的全景x线片进行分析。样本中男性和女性的平均实足年龄分别为29.04岁和29.97岁。根据Olze等和Timme等设计的计算公式,对34、35、44和45号牙的次牙本质形成、牙骨质增生、牙周萎缩和磨耗等参数进行评估。结果:用Olze方法估算的男性平均年龄为28.97±2.86岁,女性平均年龄为27.85±2.70岁。Timme法估计男性平均年龄32.54±5.32岁,女性平均年龄33.09±5.16岁。两种方法的牙齿特异性公式的低决定系数(r2)表明,估计年龄和实足年龄没有适当的关联。结论:本研究结果表明,Olze和Timme方法在巴西亚成虫和成虫的法医应用可能受到限制。针对具体国家的统计调整可能有助于改进实践。
Testing the Olze and Timme Methods for Dental Age Estimation in Radiographs of Brazilian Subadults and Adults.
Aim: This study aimed to test the applicability of the methods proposed by Olze et al. (2012) and Timme et al. for dental age estimation in Brazilian subadults and adults.
Material and methods: Panoramic radiographs of 503 individuals aged between 20 and 70 years were analyzed. The mean chronological age of males and females of the sample was 29.04 and 29.97 years, receptively. Secondary dentin formation, cementum apposition, periodontal recession, and attrition of teeth #34, #35, #44 and #45 teeth were assessed as parameters to be calculated in the formulae designed by Olze et al. and Timme et al.
Results: In males, the mean estimated age by the Olze method was 28.97 ± 2.86 years, while in females it was 27.85 ± 2.70 years. The Timme method estimated mean age for males of 32.54 ± 5.32 years and for females 33.09 ± 5.16 years. Low coefficients of determination (r2) for the application of tooth-specific formulae of both methods suggest that estimated and chronological ages were not properly associated.
Conclusion: The outcomes of this study indicate that the Olze and Timme methods may be limited for forensic applications in Brazilian subadults and adults. Country-specific statistical adjustments might be useful for improvements in practice.
期刊介绍:
The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.