偏头痛相关的痛症:一个未被重视的实体。

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Audiology and Otology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-24 DOI:10.7874/jao.2021.00465
Sarah Sussman, Zachary Zimmerman, Taylor Chishom, Lauren Reid, Mohammad Seyyedi
{"title":"偏头痛相关的痛症:一个未被重视的实体。","authors":"Sarah Sussman,&nbsp;Zachary Zimmerman,&nbsp;Taylor Chishom,&nbsp;Lauren Reid,&nbsp;Mohammad Seyyedi","doi":"10.7874/jao.2021.00465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Otalgia can be primary/otogenic or secondary as a referred pain from another site, which can be difficult to establish owing to various causes and the complex innervation of the ear. In our center, we observed a large group of patients with unexplained otalgia that had a higher prevalence of migraine. We hypothesized that migraine may cause secondary otalgia. This study then aimed to determine the prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia and evaluate the efficacy of migraine treatment.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This 2-year retrospective study was conducted at a busy otology clinic. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes corresponding to otalgia. The prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia was determined, and the efficacy of migraine treatment was evaluated in these patients. The interventions included prophylactic and abortive migraine treatments. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare between the pre- and post-treatment symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 208 patients with otalgia were identified. Sixty-four out of ninety patients with unexplained otalgia met the criteria for migraine; of them, 30 patients had an adequate follow-up and were thus included in the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Otalgia improved in 87% of the patients who received migraine treatment. After treatment, the mean pain score and headache frequency significantly decreased from 7 to 2 and from 27 to 9 days per month, respectively (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Migraine should be considered as a source of secondary otalgia, and patients should receive treatment as they often respond to migraine treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/37/jao-2021-00465.PMC8996084.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migraine-Associated Otalgia: An Underappreciated Entity.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Sussman,&nbsp;Zachary Zimmerman,&nbsp;Taylor Chishom,&nbsp;Lauren Reid,&nbsp;Mohammad Seyyedi\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/jao.2021.00465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Otalgia can be primary/otogenic or secondary as a referred pain from another site, which can be difficult to establish owing to various causes and the complex innervation of the ear. In our center, we observed a large group of patients with unexplained otalgia that had a higher prevalence of migraine. We hypothesized that migraine may cause secondary otalgia. This study then aimed to determine the prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia and evaluate the efficacy of migraine treatment.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This 2-year retrospective study was conducted at a busy otology clinic. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes corresponding to otalgia. The prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia was determined, and the efficacy of migraine treatment was evaluated in these patients. The interventions included prophylactic and abortive migraine treatments. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare between the pre- and post-treatment symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 208 patients with otalgia were identified. Sixty-four out of ninety patients with unexplained otalgia met the criteria for migraine; of them, 30 patients had an adequate follow-up and were thus included in the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Otalgia improved in 87% of the patients who received migraine treatment. After treatment, the mean pain score and headache frequency significantly decreased from 7 to 2 and from 27 to 9 days per month, respectively (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Migraine should be considered as a source of secondary otalgia, and patients should receive treatment as they often respond to migraine treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/37/jao-2021-00465.PMC8996084.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Audiology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2021.00465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2021.00465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:耳痛可以是原发/耳源性的,也可以是继发的,作为其他部位的参考疼痛,由于各种原因和耳神经支配的复杂性,难以确定。在我们的中心,我们观察了一大群患有不明原因耳痛的患者,他们有较高的偏头痛患病率。我们假设偏头痛可能导致继发性耳痛。这项研究旨在确定偏头痛相关耳痛的患病率,并评估偏头痛治疗的疗效。研究对象和方法:本研究在一家繁忙的耳科诊所进行了为期2年的回顾性研究。使用与耳痛相对应的诊断代码识别患者。确定偏头痛相关耳痛的患病率,并评估这些患者偏头痛治疗的疗效。干预措施包括预防性和流产性偏头痛治疗。对治疗前后症状进行统计学分析比较。结果:共确诊耳痛患者208例。90例不明原因耳痛患者中有64例符合偏头痛的标准;其中30例患者随访充分,纳入疗效评价。接受偏头痛治疗的患者中,87%的人痛症得到改善。治疗后,平均疼痛评分和头痛频率分别从每月7天和27天显著下降到2天和9天。结论:偏头痛应被视为继发性耳痛的来源,患者应接受治疗,因为他们经常对偏头痛治疗有反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Migraine-Associated Otalgia: An Underappreciated Entity.

Background and objectives: Otalgia can be primary/otogenic or secondary as a referred pain from another site, which can be difficult to establish owing to various causes and the complex innervation of the ear. In our center, we observed a large group of patients with unexplained otalgia that had a higher prevalence of migraine. We hypothesized that migraine may cause secondary otalgia. This study then aimed to determine the prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia and evaluate the efficacy of migraine treatment.

Subjects and methods: This 2-year retrospective study was conducted at a busy otology clinic. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes corresponding to otalgia. The prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia was determined, and the efficacy of migraine treatment was evaluated in these patients. The interventions included prophylactic and abortive migraine treatments. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare between the pre- and post-treatment symptoms.

Results: A total of 208 patients with otalgia were identified. Sixty-four out of ninety patients with unexplained otalgia met the criteria for migraine; of them, 30 patients had an adequate follow-up and were thus included in the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Otalgia improved in 87% of the patients who received migraine treatment. After treatment, the mean pain score and headache frequency significantly decreased from 7 to 2 and from 27 to 9 days per month, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Migraine should be considered as a source of secondary otalgia, and patients should receive treatment as they often respond to migraine treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Audiology and Otology
Journal of Audiology and Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.
期刊最新文献
Does Cognitive Function Affect Performance and Listening Effort During Bilateral Wireless Streaming in Hearing Aid Users? Hearing Screening for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review. How to Help Deaf Children Who Do Not Understand Their Vestibular Symptoms and Motor Disorders as Abnormal? Test-Retest Reliability of Tone Burst-Induced 500 Hz Air-Conduction Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Healthy Individuals. The Relationship Between Lower Vitamin D Levels and Hearing Loss in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1