微创二尖瓣修复的综合疼痛控制策略。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2022-06-20 Epub Date: 2021-12-07 DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131
Mitsuharu Hosono, Hiroshi Yasumoto, Shintaro Kuwauchi, Yoshino Mitsunaga, Uetsuki Tomohiko, Naoki Minato, Kohei Kawazoe
{"title":"微创二尖瓣修复的综合疼痛控制策略。","authors":"Mitsuharu Hosono,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yasumoto,&nbsp;Shintaro Kuwauchi,&nbsp;Yoshino Mitsunaga,&nbsp;Uetsuki Tomohiko,&nbsp;Naoki Minato,&nbsp;Kohei Kawazoe","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of our comprehensive strategy to reduce pain after minimally invasive mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy was assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our comprehensive strategy constituted the following: planned rib cutting to avoid rib injury, sufficient intercostal muscle division to mobilize the cut rib, limiting the number of intercostal ports, avoiding nerve entrapment, continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block, and regular use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared patients treated with this comprehensive strategy (Group S, n = 13) and patients before this strategy was implemented (Group C, n = 13). We used a numerical rating scale (NRS) as a pain scale during the first 3 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average NRS was significantly lower in Group S (0.82 ± 0.49) than in Group C (2.40 ± 1.46) (P <0.01). The maximum NRS was also significantly lower in Group S (3.23 ± 1.17) than in Group C (5.69 ± 2.43) (P <0.01). The number of patients using additional single-dose analgesic were significantly less in Group S (23.1%) than in Group C (84.6%) (P <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our comprehensive pain control strategy effectively reduced postoperative pain in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":8037,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"28 3","pages":"180-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/55/atcs-28-180.PMC9209889.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Pain Control Strategy in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuharu Hosono,&nbsp;Hiroshi Yasumoto,&nbsp;Shintaro Kuwauchi,&nbsp;Yoshino Mitsunaga,&nbsp;Uetsuki Tomohiko,&nbsp;Naoki Minato,&nbsp;Kohei Kawazoe\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of our comprehensive strategy to reduce pain after minimally invasive mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy was assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our comprehensive strategy constituted the following: planned rib cutting to avoid rib injury, sufficient intercostal muscle division to mobilize the cut rib, limiting the number of intercostal ports, avoiding nerve entrapment, continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block, and regular use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared patients treated with this comprehensive strategy (Group S, n = 13) and patients before this strategy was implemented (Group C, n = 13). We used a numerical rating scale (NRS) as a pain scale during the first 3 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average NRS was significantly lower in Group S (0.82 ± 0.49) than in Group C (2.40 ± 1.46) (P <0.01). The maximum NRS was also significantly lower in Group S (3.23 ± 1.17) than in Group C (5.69 ± 2.43) (P <0.01). The number of patients using additional single-dose analgesic were significantly less in Group S (23.1%) than in Group C (84.6%) (P <0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our comprehensive pain control strategy effectively reduced postoperative pain in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"180-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/55/atcs-28-180.PMC9209889.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:回顾性评价经右小开胸微创二尖瓣修复术后综合治疗方案的效果。方法:我们的综合策略是:有计划的肋骨切割以避免肋骨损伤,充分的肋间肌分隔以调动被切割的肋骨,限制肋间端口的数量,避免神经卡压,持续的胸膜外肋间神经阻滞,定期使用口服非甾体类抗炎药。我们比较采用该综合策略治疗的患者(S组,n = 13)和未采用该策略的患者(C组,n = 13)。我们使用数值评定量表(NRS)作为术后前3天的疼痛量表。结果:S组的平均NRS(0.82±0.49)明显低于C组(2.40±1.46)(P)。结论:综合疼痛控制策略可有效减轻微创二尖瓣修复术后的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive Pain Control Strategy in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair.

Purpose: The effect of our comprehensive strategy to reduce pain after minimally invasive mitral valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy was assessed retrospectively.

Methods: Our comprehensive strategy constituted the following: planned rib cutting to avoid rib injury, sufficient intercostal muscle division to mobilize the cut rib, limiting the number of intercostal ports, avoiding nerve entrapment, continuous extra-pleural intercostal nerve block, and regular use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We compared patients treated with this comprehensive strategy (Group S, n = 13) and patients before this strategy was implemented (Group C, n = 13). We used a numerical rating scale (NRS) as a pain scale during the first 3 days postoperatively.

Results: The average NRS was significantly lower in Group S (0.82 ± 0.49) than in Group C (2.40 ± 1.46) (P <0.01). The maximum NRS was also significantly lower in Group S (3.23 ± 1.17) than in Group C (5.69 ± 2.43) (P <0.01). The number of patients using additional single-dose analgesic were significantly less in Group S (23.1%) than in Group C (84.6%) (P <0.01).

Conclusion: Our comprehensive pain control strategy effectively reduced postoperative pain in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Arterial Embolization and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Resection for Anomalous Systemic Arterial Blood Supply to Normal Lung: Two Case Reports. Surgery for Ascending Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Valve Insufficiency in Conditions of Active Proceeding Syphilitic Aortitis and Valvulitis. Impact of Graft Velocity on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Surgery for Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Chronic Lung Diseases. Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1