对办公室麻醉师感兴趣的当前文献综述。

Q3 Medicine Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245
Mark A Saxen
{"title":"对办公室麻醉师感兴趣的当前文献综述。","authors":"Mark A Saxen","doi":"10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has been, and continues to be, associated with severe morbidity and death despite recent advances in relevant guidelines and airway management. In this closed claim analysis, 115 cases of pulmonary aspiration were retrieved from the Anesthesia Closed Claims Database for the period between 2000 and 2015. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with surgical, procedural, or obstetric anesthesia care were included, whereas claims associated with acute or chronic pain management were excluded. Death occurred in 57% of the claims and severe permanent injury occurred in another 14%. Risk factors that occurred in 10% ormore of cases included emergency procedure, gastrointestinal obstruction or other acute intra-abdominal process, body mass index . 35 kg/m, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and recent oral intake (defined as more recent than standard nil per os recommendations). The presence of at least 1 aspiration risk factor was identified in 93% of the claims. Of the patients identified within the claims, 61% had either gastrointestinal obstruction or another intraabdominal process. Management of the aspiration event was judged to be substandard in 59% of the 115 claims. Comment: The findings from this study failed to confirm the application of cricoid pressure and rapid sequence induction as strategies for preventing aspiration. The authors note that although pregnancy and delivery have historically been considered major aspiration risk factors, only 3 of 115 patients in this series were pregnant. Because no definitive treatment for aspiration has been described to date, the best strategy for prevention is to avoid known risk factors.","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"68 4","pages":"245-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674850/pdf/i0003-3006-68-4-245.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist.\",\"authors\":\"Mark A Saxen\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has been, and continues to be, associated with severe morbidity and death despite recent advances in relevant guidelines and airway management. In this closed claim analysis, 115 cases of pulmonary aspiration were retrieved from the Anesthesia Closed Claims Database for the period between 2000 and 2015. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with surgical, procedural, or obstetric anesthesia care were included, whereas claims associated with acute or chronic pain management were excluded. Death occurred in 57% of the claims and severe permanent injury occurred in another 14%. Risk factors that occurred in 10% ormore of cases included emergency procedure, gastrointestinal obstruction or other acute intra-abdominal process, body mass index . 35 kg/m, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and recent oral intake (defined as more recent than standard nil per os recommendations). The presence of at least 1 aspiration risk factor was identified in 93% of the claims. Of the patients identified within the claims, 61% had either gastrointestinal obstruction or another intraabdominal process. Management of the aspiration event was judged to be substandard in 59% of the 115 claims. Comment: The findings from this study failed to confirm the application of cricoid pressure and rapid sequence induction as strategies for preventing aspiration. The authors note that although pregnancy and delivery have historically been considered major aspiration risk factors, only 3 of 115 patients in this series were pregnant. Because no definitive treatment for aspiration has been described to date, the best strategy for prevention is to avoid known risk factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"245-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674850/pdf/i0003-3006-68-4-245.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-68.4.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist.
Perioperative pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has been, and continues to be, associated with severe morbidity and death despite recent advances in relevant guidelines and airway management. In this closed claim analysis, 115 cases of pulmonary aspiration were retrieved from the Anesthesia Closed Claims Database for the period between 2000 and 2015. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with surgical, procedural, or obstetric anesthesia care were included, whereas claims associated with acute or chronic pain management were excluded. Death occurred in 57% of the claims and severe permanent injury occurred in another 14%. Risk factors that occurred in 10% ormore of cases included emergency procedure, gastrointestinal obstruction or other acute intra-abdominal process, body mass index . 35 kg/m, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and recent oral intake (defined as more recent than standard nil per os recommendations). The presence of at least 1 aspiration risk factor was identified in 93% of the claims. Of the patients identified within the claims, 61% had either gastrointestinal obstruction or another intraabdominal process. Management of the aspiration event was judged to be substandard in 59% of the 115 claims. Comment: The findings from this study failed to confirm the application of cricoid pressure and rapid sequence induction as strategies for preventing aspiration. The authors note that although pregnancy and delivery have historically been considered major aspiration risk factors, only 3 of 115 patients in this series were pregnant. Because no definitive treatment for aspiration has been described to date, the best strategy for prevention is to avoid known risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Sedation Levels Using SedLine During Intravenous Sedation for Dental Procedures: A Case-Series Study. Cardiac Arrest Due to Pacing Failure From Pilsicainide Poisoning. A New Dental Specialty in Canada. Literature Review for Office-Based Anesthesia. Hypotension Without Skin Symptoms at Local Anesthesia in Dental Treatment: Anaphylaxis? Or Vasovagal Reaction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1