回顾流行病中的慈善事业基金会的同事们分享了来自大洋彼岸的共同观点。

Robert J Bob Reid, Caroline Broadhurst
{"title":"回顾流行病中的慈善事业基金会的同事们分享了来自大洋彼岸的共同观点。","authors":"Robert J Bob Reid,&nbsp;Caroline Broadhurst","doi":"10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past year, the pandemic caused havoc globally touching the lives of most people. This included emerging challenges for nonprofits on the front lines of escalating need while at the same time limiting fundraising. Scaling up to meet needs in an extreme resource constrained environment pushed many nonprofits to the brink of insolvency. Many foundations have responded effectively to this circumstance by increasing grant making, reducing red tape, and extending greater flexibility for nonprofits. In doing so, foundations have exercised unusual humility in how they positioned themselves relative to nonprofits in protecting capacity to serve intended beneficiaries. This op-ed explores the relaxing of traditional tensions between foundations and grant seekers in ways that enabled more adequate and timely responses to pressing human needs in the face of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of community well-being","volume":"5 2","pages":"497-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Back on Philanthropy in a Pandemic Foundation Colleagues Share Common Perspectives from Across the Pond.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Bob Reid,&nbsp;Caroline Broadhurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the past year, the pandemic caused havoc globally touching the lives of most people. This included emerging challenges for nonprofits on the front lines of escalating need while at the same time limiting fundraising. Scaling up to meet needs in an extreme resource constrained environment pushed many nonprofits to the brink of insolvency. Many foundations have responded effectively to this circumstance by increasing grant making, reducing red tape, and extending greater flexibility for nonprofits. In doing so, foundations have exercised unusual humility in how they positioned themselves relative to nonprofits in protecting capacity to serve intended beneficiaries. This op-ed explores the relaxing of traditional tensions between foundations and grant seekers in ways that enabled more adequate and timely responses to pressing human needs in the face of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of community well-being\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"497-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of community well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of community well-being","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00115-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

过去一年,疫情在全球造成严重破坏,影响到大多数人的生活。这包括非营利组织面临的新挑战,这些挑战在需求不断升级的同时又限制了筹款。在资源极度紧张的环境下,扩大规模以满足需求,将许多非营利组织推到了破产的边缘。许多基金会通过增加拨款,减少繁文缛节,为非营利组织提供更大的灵活性,有效地应对了这种情况。在这样做的过程中,基金会在如何定位自己,保护自己为目标受益人服务的能力方面,表现出了不同寻常的谦逊。这篇专栏文章探讨了如何缓解基金会与寻求资助者之间的传统紧张关系,从而能够更充分、更及时地应对面临这一流行病的紧迫人类需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Looking Back on Philanthropy in a Pandemic Foundation Colleagues Share Common Perspectives from Across the Pond.

Over the past year, the pandemic caused havoc globally touching the lives of most people. This included emerging challenges for nonprofits on the front lines of escalating need while at the same time limiting fundraising. Scaling up to meet needs in an extreme resource constrained environment pushed many nonprofits to the brink of insolvency. Many foundations have responded effectively to this circumstance by increasing grant making, reducing red tape, and extending greater flexibility for nonprofits. In doing so, foundations have exercised unusual humility in how they positioned themselves relative to nonprofits in protecting capacity to serve intended beneficiaries. This op-ed explores the relaxing of traditional tensions between foundations and grant seekers in ways that enabled more adequate and timely responses to pressing human needs in the face of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Landscape of Gig Workers’ Well-Being: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Worker Satisfaction with Special Emphasis on Gig Economy: A Review for Potential Research Paradigm Do Children Matter in the Quest for Sustainable Development Goals Attainment? Children’s Vulnerability and Water Scarcity in Zimbabwe Ethnic Minority Inclusion in Well-Being Research: Beyond Widening Participation The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in Community Wellbeing Research: Deliberative Method and the Lens of ‘Pragmatic Complexity’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1