对用于微创手术的新型创新机器人系统Versius的培训计划进行评估。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2021-10-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057
Jessica Butterworth, Margaux Sadry, Danielle Julian, Fiona Haig
{"title":"对用于微创手术的新型创新机器人系统Versius的培训计划进行评估。","authors":"Jessica Butterworth,&nbsp;Margaux Sadry,&nbsp;Danielle Julian,&nbsp;Fiona Haig","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Versius surgical system has been developed for use in robot-assisted minimal access surgery (MAS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Versius training program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 3.5-day program following 10 hours of online didactic training. Participants were assessed during the technical training using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dry box exercises were conducted in classrooms, and wet lab sessions simulated an operating room environment using cadaveric specimens.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen surgical teams participated; surgeons represented general, colorectal, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology specialties. All surgeons had previous laparoscopic MAS experience, while experience with robotics varied.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Participants were scored on a five-point Likert Scale for each of six validated GEARS domains (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, autonomy, and robotic control). Additional metrics used to chart surgeon performance included: combined instrument path length; combined instrument angular path; and time taken to complete each task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants demonstrated an overall improvement in performance during the study, with a mean GEARS Score of 21.0 (SD: 1.9) in Assessment 1 increasing to 23.4 (SD: 2.9) in Validation. Greatest improvements were observed in the depth perception and robotic control domains. Greatest differences were observed when stratifying by robotic experience; those with extensive experience consistently scored higher than those with some or no experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Versius training program is effective; participants were able to successfully operate the system by program completion, and more surgeons achieved intermediate-level and expert-level GEARS scores in Validation compared with Assessment 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"3 1","pages":"e000057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/1b/bmjsit-2020-000057.PMC8647592.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the training program for Versius, a new innovative robotic system for use in minimal access surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Butterworth,&nbsp;Margaux Sadry,&nbsp;Danielle Julian,&nbsp;Fiona Haig\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Versius surgical system has been developed for use in robot-assisted minimal access surgery (MAS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Versius training program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A 3.5-day program following 10 hours of online didactic training. Participants were assessed during the technical training using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dry box exercises were conducted in classrooms, and wet lab sessions simulated an operating room environment using cadaveric specimens.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventeen surgical teams participated; surgeons represented general, colorectal, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology specialties. All surgeons had previous laparoscopic MAS experience, while experience with robotics varied.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Participants were scored on a five-point Likert Scale for each of six validated GEARS domains (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, autonomy, and robotic control). Additional metrics used to chart surgeon performance included: combined instrument path length; combined instrument angular path; and time taken to complete each task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants demonstrated an overall improvement in performance during the study, with a mean GEARS Score of 21.0 (SD: 1.9) in Assessment 1 increasing to 23.4 (SD: 2.9) in Validation. Greatest improvements were observed in the depth perception and robotic control domains. Greatest differences were observed when stratifying by robotic experience; those with extensive experience consistently scored higher than those with some or no experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Versius training program is effective; participants were able to successfully operate the system by program completion, and more surgeons achieved intermediate-level and expert-level GEARS scores in Validation compared with Assessment 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e000057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/1b/bmjsit-2020-000057.PMC8647592.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:Versius手术系统已开发用于机器人辅助最小通道手术(MAS)。本研究旨在评估Versius训练计划的有效性。设计:为期3.5天的课程,包括10小时的在线教学培训。参与者在技术培训期间使用机器人技能全球评估评估(GEARS)进行评估。设置:在教室中进行干箱练习,湿实验室使用尸体标本模拟手术室环境。参与者:17个手术小组;外科医生代表了普通外科、结直肠外科、产科/妇科和泌尿外科专业。所有外科医生以前都有腹腔镜MAS经验,而机器人的经验各不相同。主要结果测量:参与者在六个经过验证的GEARS领域(深度感知,双手灵活性,效率,力敏感性,自主性和机器人控制)的五个李克特量表上得分。用于记录外科医生表现的其他指标包括:联合器械路径长度;组合仪器角路径;以及完成每项任务所需的时间。结果:参与者在研究期间表现出整体的改善,在评估1中的平均GEARS得分为21.0 (SD: 1.9),在验证中增加到23.4 (SD: 2.9)。在深度感知和机器人控制领域观察到最大的改善。在机器人经验分层时观察到最大的差异;那些有丰富经验的人总是比那些有经验或没有经验的人得分更高。结论:Versius训练方案是有效的;通过项目完成,参与者能够成功地操作系统,与评估1相比,更多的外科医生在验证中获得中级和专家级的GEARS分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the training program for Versius, a new innovative robotic system for use in minimal access surgery.

Objectives: The Versius surgical system has been developed for use in robot-assisted minimal access surgery (MAS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Versius training program.

Design: A 3.5-day program following 10 hours of online didactic training. Participants were assessed during the technical training using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).

Setting: Dry box exercises were conducted in classrooms, and wet lab sessions simulated an operating room environment using cadaveric specimens.

Participants: Seventeen surgical teams participated; surgeons represented general, colorectal, obstetrics/gynecology, and urology specialties. All surgeons had previous laparoscopic MAS experience, while experience with robotics varied.

Main outcomes measures: Participants were scored on a five-point Likert Scale for each of six validated GEARS domains (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, autonomy, and robotic control). Additional metrics used to chart surgeon performance included: combined instrument path length; combined instrument angular path; and time taken to complete each task.

Results: Participants demonstrated an overall improvement in performance during the study, with a mean GEARS Score of 21.0 (SD: 1.9) in Assessment 1 increasing to 23.4 (SD: 2.9) in Validation. Greatest improvements were observed in the depth perception and robotic control domains. Greatest differences were observed when stratifying by robotic experience; those with extensive experience consistently scored higher than those with some or no experience.

Conclusions: The Versius training program is effective; participants were able to successfully operate the system by program completion, and more surgeons achieved intermediate-level and expert-level GEARS scores in Validation compared with Assessment 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Financial incentives and motivational intervention to improve gastric cancer screening in China: a randomized controlled trial study protocol. The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1