8719例个体生殖系变异的外显子组泛癌分析发现很少有罕见变异关联的证据。

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Heredity Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1159/000519355
Zoe Guan, Ronglai Shen, Colin B Begg
{"title":"8719例个体生殖系变异的外显子组泛癌分析发现很少有罕见变异关联的证据。","authors":"Zoe Guan,&nbsp;Ronglai Shen,&nbsp;Colin B Begg","doi":"10.1159/000519355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The \"rare variant hypothesis\" proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":13226,"journal":{"name":"Human Heredity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889565/pdf/nihms-1780279.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exome-Wide Pan-Cancer Analysis of Germline Variants in 8,719 Individuals Finds Little Evidence of Rare Variant Associations.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Guan,&nbsp;Ronglai Shen,&nbsp;Colin B Begg\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000519355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The \\\"rare variant hypothesis\\\" proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Heredity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8889565/pdf/nihms-1780279.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Heredity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:许多癌症类型显示出相当大的遗传性,并且已经进行了广泛的研究来确定种系易感性变异。连锁研究发现了许多罕见的高风险变异,全基因组关联研究(GWAS)发现了许多常见的低风险变异。然而,人们认为,相当大比例的癌症遗传性仍然无法解释已知的易感性变异。“罕见变异假说”提出,大部分缺失的遗传性存在于无法通过连锁分析或GWAS可靠地检测到的罕见变异中。直到最近,高昂的测序成本阻碍了对罕见变异的广泛调查,但技术进步现在使得在更大范围内分析罕见变异成为可能。目的:在这项研究中,我们调查了罕见变异与14种癌症类型之间的关系。方法:我们使用来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的全外显子组测序数据进行关联测试,并使用来自泛癌症全基因组分析联盟(PCAWG)的数据验证研究结果。结果:我们确定了TCGA的四个显著关联,其中只有一个在PCAWG中被重复(BRCA1和卵巢癌)。结论:我们的结果提供了很少的证据支持罕见变异假说。可能需要更大的样本量来检测未被发现的罕见癌症变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exome-Wide Pan-Cancer Analysis of Germline Variants in 8,719 Individuals Finds Little Evidence of Rare Variant Associations.

Background: Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The "rare variant hypothesis" proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale.

Objectives: In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types.

Methods: We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG).

Results: We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer).

Conclusions: Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Heredity
Human Heredity 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gathering original research reports and short communications from all over the world, ''Human Heredity'' is devoted to methodological and applied research on the genetics of human populations, association and linkage analysis, genetic mechanisms of disease, and new methods for statistical genetics, for example, analysis of rare variants and results from next generation sequencing. The value of this information to many branches of medicine is shown by the number of citations the journal receives in fields ranging from immunology and hematology to epidemiology and public health planning, and the fact that at least 50% of all ''Human Heredity'' papers are still cited more than 8 years after publication (according to ISI Journal Citation Reports). Special issues on methodological topics (such as ‘Consanguinity and Genomics’ in 2014; ‘Analyzing Rare Variants in Complex Diseases’ in 2012) or reviews of advances in particular fields (‘Genetic Diversity in European Populations: Evolutionary Evidence and Medical Implications’ in 2014; ‘Genes and the Environment in Obesity’ in 2013) are published every year. Renowned experts in the field are invited to contribute to these special issues.
期刊最新文献
Place of concordance-discordance model in evaluating NGS performance. Implications of the Co-Dominance Model for Hardy-Weinberg Testing in Genetic Association Studies. Joint Linkage and Association Analysis Using GENEHUNTER-MODSCORE with an Application to Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Investigation of Recessive Effects of Coding Variants on Common Clinical Phenotypes in Exome-Sequenced UK Biobank Participants. comorbidPGS: An R Package Assessing Shared Predisposition between Phenotypes Using Polygenic Scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1