CDFA方法:一种在概念设计阶段评估飞机系统架构装配与安装性能的方法。

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s00163-021-00378-5
Giovanni Formentini, Francois Bouissiere, Claude Cuiller, Pierre-Eric Dereux, Claudio Favi
{"title":"CDFA方法:一种在概念设计阶段评估飞机系统架构装配与安装性能的方法。","authors":"Giovanni Formentini,&nbsp;Francois Bouissiere,&nbsp;Claude Cuiller,&nbsp;Pierre-Eric Dereux,&nbsp;Claudio Favi","doi":"10.1007/s00163-021-00378-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes an engineering design methodology, called conceptual design for assembly (CDFA) in the context of aircraft development, to assess aircraft systems' installation during conceptual phase, in relation to industrial performance objectives. The methodology is based on a given framework (hierarchical structure) which includes a set of attributes, collected in recognized domains that characterize the aircraft systems installation. The framework of the CDFA methodology enables to analyze product architectures at different levels of granularity, splitting the global analysis into sub-problems (problem discretization) with the aim to help architects and designers to identify product architecture weaknesses in terms of fit for assembly performances. The CDFA methodology was applied on a complex system (the nose-fuselage of a commercial aircraft) presenting a high number of criticalities both for the product and its assembly operations. Results identified the architectural components leading to the less efficient assembly operations and the rationales enabling to elaborate alternative architectures for an improved product industrial efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49629,"journal":{"name":"Research in Engineering Design","volume":"33 1","pages":"31-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763447/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CDFA method: a way to assess assembly and installation performance of aircraft system architectures at the conceptual design.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Formentini,&nbsp;Francois Bouissiere,&nbsp;Claude Cuiller,&nbsp;Pierre-Eric Dereux,&nbsp;Claudio Favi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00163-021-00378-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper describes an engineering design methodology, called conceptual design for assembly (CDFA) in the context of aircraft development, to assess aircraft systems' installation during conceptual phase, in relation to industrial performance objectives. The methodology is based on a given framework (hierarchical structure) which includes a set of attributes, collected in recognized domains that characterize the aircraft systems installation. The framework of the CDFA methodology enables to analyze product architectures at different levels of granularity, splitting the global analysis into sub-problems (problem discretization) with the aim to help architects and designers to identify product architecture weaknesses in terms of fit for assembly performances. The CDFA methodology was applied on a complex system (the nose-fuselage of a commercial aircraft) presenting a high number of criticalities both for the product and its assembly operations. Results identified the architectural components leading to the less efficient assembly operations and the rationales enabling to elaborate alternative architectures for an improved product industrial efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Engineering Design\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"31-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00378-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00378-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文描述了一种工程设计方法,称为概念装配设计(CDFA),在飞机开发的背景下,评估飞机系统在概念阶段的安装,与工业性能目标有关。该方法基于一个给定的框架(层次结构),其中包括一组属性,这些属性收集在表征飞机系统安装的识别域中。CDFA方法的框架能够在不同的粒度级别上分析产品架构,将全局分析分解为子问题(问题离散化),目的是帮助架构师和设计师识别产品架构在适合装配性能方面的弱点。CDFA方法应用于一个复杂的系统(商用飞机的机头机身),该系统对产品及其装配操作都具有大量的临界性。结果确定了导致效率较低的组装操作的架构组件,以及能够为改进产品工业效率而精心设计替代架构的基本原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CDFA method: a way to assess assembly and installation performance of aircraft system architectures at the conceptual design.

This paper describes an engineering design methodology, called conceptual design for assembly (CDFA) in the context of aircraft development, to assess aircraft systems' installation during conceptual phase, in relation to industrial performance objectives. The methodology is based on a given framework (hierarchical structure) which includes a set of attributes, collected in recognized domains that characterize the aircraft systems installation. The framework of the CDFA methodology enables to analyze product architectures at different levels of granularity, splitting the global analysis into sub-problems (problem discretization) with the aim to help architects and designers to identify product architecture weaknesses in terms of fit for assembly performances. The CDFA methodology was applied on a complex system (the nose-fuselage of a commercial aircraft) presenting a high number of criticalities both for the product and its assembly operations. Results identified the architectural components leading to the less efficient assembly operations and the rationales enabling to elaborate alternative architectures for an improved product industrial efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Engineering Design
Research in Engineering Design 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 months
期刊介绍: Research in Engineering Design is an international journal that publishes research papers on design theory and methodology in all fields of engineering, focussing on mechanical, civil, architectural, and manufacturing engineering. The journal is designed for professionals in academia, industry and government interested in research issues relevant to design practice. Papers emphasize underlying principles of engineering design and discipline-oriented research where results are of interest or extendible to other engineering domains. General areas of interest include theories of design, foundations of design environments, representations and languages, models of design processes, and integration of design and manufacturing. Representative topics include functional representation, feature-based design, shape grammars, process design, redesign, product data base models, and empirical studies. The journal also publishes state-of-the-art review articles.
期刊最新文献
The effect of targeting both quantitative and qualitative objectives in generative design tools on the design outcomes The impacts of non-perceptual cognition (NPC) on design process and ideation A new method to prioritize the QFDs’ engineering characteristics inspired by the Law of  Comparative Judgment Fostering self-efficacy through usability and emotional product design? An explorative study Evaluating the effectiveness of functional decomposition in early-stage design: development and application of problem space exploration metrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1