脊柱畸形保守治疗指南-德尔菲共识问卷。

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-12-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1587
Elif E Dereli, Shaopeng Gong, Tuğba Kuru Çolak, Deborah Turnbull
{"title":"脊柱畸形保守治疗指南-德尔菲共识问卷。","authors":"Elif E Dereli,&nbsp;Shaopeng Gong,&nbsp;Tuğba Kuru Çolak,&nbsp;Deborah Turnbull","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal deformity is the oldest disease known to humankind. Many types of treatment methods, including both conservative and surgical, are in use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to validate a published guideline protocol based on the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used with a questionnaire sent out to professionals worldwide regarding the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study was completed after two rounds. A strong level of agreement of 80% and more (consensus cut-off point) was achieved in most questions in the first round. Some statements were below this margin, and they were sent to the participants via email in the second round for re-evaluation. Consensus was achieved in almost all of the statements in the second round. Only two items did not reach the cut-off point but were close to this value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This proposed Guideline Protocol was approved by the participants using the Delphi method and can be used as a valid tool for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A conservative treatment guideline in spinal deformity management, will provide consistency in treatment and will facilitate comparability with surgery. It will be useful in determining the cost-effectiveness of treatment and in choosing the right patient for the right method of treatment. This guideline might help in this context, and may also create a systematic method for clinicians to use as a reference in both research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"77 2","pages":"1587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678962/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities - Questionnaire for a Delphi consensus.\",\"authors\":\"Elif E Dereli,&nbsp;Shaopeng Gong,&nbsp;Tuğba Kuru Çolak,&nbsp;Deborah Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal deformity is the oldest disease known to humankind. Many types of treatment methods, including both conservative and surgical, are in use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to validate a published guideline protocol based on the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used with a questionnaire sent out to professionals worldwide regarding the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study was completed after two rounds. A strong level of agreement of 80% and more (consensus cut-off point) was achieved in most questions in the first round. Some statements were below this margin, and they were sent to the participants via email in the second round for re-evaluation. Consensus was achieved in almost all of the statements in the second round. Only two items did not reach the cut-off point but were close to this value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This proposed Guideline Protocol was approved by the participants using the Delphi method and can be used as a valid tool for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A conservative treatment guideline in spinal deformity management, will provide consistency in treatment and will facilitate comparability with surgery. It will be useful in determining the cost-effectiveness of treatment and in choosing the right patient for the right method of treatment. This guideline might help in this context, and may also create a systematic method for clinicians to use as a reference in both research and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"77 2\",\"pages\":\"1587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:脊柱畸形是人类已知的最古老的疾病。许多类型的治疗方法,包括保守和手术,都在使用。目的:我们旨在验证一项基于脊柱畸形保守治疗的已发表的指导方案。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法,向世界各地的专业人员发放关于脊柱畸形保守治疗的调查问卷。结果:我们的研究在两轮后完成。在第一轮中,大多数问题的一致性达到80%以上(共识分界点)。有些陈述低于这个范围,它们将在第二轮通过电子邮件发送给参与者进行重新评估。第二轮几乎所有发言都达成了共识。只有两个项目没有达到分界点,但接近这个值。结论:该指南方案通过德尔菲法得到了参与者的认可,可作为脊柱畸形保守治疗的有效工具。临床意义:脊柱畸形管理的保守治疗指南将提供治疗的一致性,并将促进与手术的可比性。它将有助于确定治疗的成本效益和选择合适的患者进行正确的治疗方法。本指南可能在这方面有所帮助,也可能为临床医生在研究和临床实践中提供一个系统的方法作为参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guidelines for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities - Questionnaire for a Delphi consensus.

Background: Spinal deformity is the oldest disease known to humankind. Many types of treatment methods, including both conservative and surgical, are in use.

Objective: We aimed to validate a published guideline protocol based on the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Method: A modified Delphi technique was used with a questionnaire sent out to professionals worldwide regarding the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Results: Our study was completed after two rounds. A strong level of agreement of 80% and more (consensus cut-off point) was achieved in most questions in the first round. Some statements were below this margin, and they were sent to the participants via email in the second round for re-evaluation. Consensus was achieved in almost all of the statements in the second round. Only two items did not reach the cut-off point but were close to this value.

Conclusion: This proposed Guideline Protocol was approved by the participants using the Delphi method and can be used as a valid tool for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities.

Clinical implications: A conservative treatment guideline in spinal deformity management, will provide consistency in treatment and will facilitate comparability with surgery. It will be useful in determining the cost-effectiveness of treatment and in choosing the right patient for the right method of treatment. This guideline might help in this context, and may also create a systematic method for clinicians to use as a reference in both research and clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acute exacerbation of COPD: Physiotherapy practice and factors that influence management. Low back pain treatment adherence barriers in Eswatini private physiotherapy practices: A pilot study. Efficacy of aerobic exercise for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders receiving ART: An RCT. Physiotherapists transgressions lodged at the Health Professions Council of South Africa between 2010 and 2020. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for rugby-related injuries: A survey of the Safari Sevens tournament.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1