捷克共和国25-64岁人群动脉高血压的患病率和管理,重点是糖尿病患者。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie Pub Date : 2021-01-01
V Vejtasová, M Lustigová, J Urbanová, K Žejglicová, J Malinovská, D Janíčková Žďárská, L Brunerová, K Kučera, J Brož
{"title":"捷克共和国25-64岁人群动脉高血压的患病率和管理,重点是糖尿病患者。","authors":"V Vejtasová,&nbsp;M Lustigová,&nbsp;J Urbanová,&nbsp;K Žejglicová,&nbsp;J Malinovská,&nbsp;D Janíčková Žďárská,&nbsp;L Brunerová,&nbsp;K Kučera,&nbsp;J Brož","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of arterial hypertension and its awareness rate and control rate among diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in the Czech Republic between 25-64 years of age and to compare the results with those in age-matched non-diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blood pressure measurement data of 1 170 respondents (467 men and 703 women) obtained during the EHES study in 2014 were analysed. DM was diagnosed in 95 (8.2%) respondents (44 men and 51 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean systolic blood pressure in DM patients was 130.7 ± 18.3 vs. 123.2 ± 16.8 mmHg in non-DM subjects (p &lt; 0.001). The difference in diastolic blood pressure was on the borderline of statistical significance (82.2 ± 9.4 mmHg in DM vs. 80.0 ± 10.6 mmHg in non-DM subjects, p = 0.051). Among the study population, 69.5% of DM and 34.2% of non-DM subjects suffered from arterial hypertension (p &lt; 0.001). The hypertension awareness rates were 87.9% in the DM group and 66.8 % in the non-DM group. (p = 0.001). The percentage of treated arterial hypertension was 94.8% in DM patients vs. 80.5% in the non-DM group (p = 0.010). The blood pressure target of &lt; 140/90 mmHg was achieved in 47.3% of DM patients vs. 60.6% in non-DM subjects (p = 0.077). Using a blood pressure target of &lt; 130/80 mmHg, adequate arterial hypertension control was achieved in only 29.1% of DM patients. When comparing the achievement of the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (&lt; 130/80 mmHg) and non-DM patients (&lt; 140/90 mmHg), the difference between these groups was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) in favour of the non-diabetic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study has shown the prevalence of arterial hypertension to be twice as high in DM patients aged 25-64 compared to the age-matched non-DM subjects in the Czech Republic. The adequate blood pressure control rate is significantly lower in DM patients than in the non-diabetic population. The study results indicate that the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (&lt; 130/80 mmHg) are not always reached in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54374,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","volume":"70 4","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and management of arterial hypertension in the population aged 25-64 in the Czech Republic with a focus on diabetic patients.\",\"authors\":\"V Vejtasová,&nbsp;M Lustigová,&nbsp;J Urbanová,&nbsp;K Žejglicová,&nbsp;J Malinovská,&nbsp;D Janíčková Žďárská,&nbsp;L Brunerová,&nbsp;K Kučera,&nbsp;J Brož\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of arterial hypertension and its awareness rate and control rate among diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in the Czech Republic between 25-64 years of age and to compare the results with those in age-matched non-diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blood pressure measurement data of 1 170 respondents (467 men and 703 women) obtained during the EHES study in 2014 were analysed. DM was diagnosed in 95 (8.2%) respondents (44 men and 51 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean systolic blood pressure in DM patients was 130.7 ± 18.3 vs. 123.2 ± 16.8 mmHg in non-DM subjects (p &lt; 0.001). The difference in diastolic blood pressure was on the borderline of statistical significance (82.2 ± 9.4 mmHg in DM vs. 80.0 ± 10.6 mmHg in non-DM subjects, p = 0.051). Among the study population, 69.5% of DM and 34.2% of non-DM subjects suffered from arterial hypertension (p &lt; 0.001). The hypertension awareness rates were 87.9% in the DM group and 66.8 % in the non-DM group. (p = 0.001). The percentage of treated arterial hypertension was 94.8% in DM patients vs. 80.5% in the non-DM group (p = 0.010). The blood pressure target of &lt; 140/90 mmHg was achieved in 47.3% of DM patients vs. 60.6% in non-DM subjects (p = 0.077). Using a blood pressure target of &lt; 130/80 mmHg, adequate arterial hypertension control was achieved in only 29.1% of DM patients. When comparing the achievement of the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (&lt; 130/80 mmHg) and non-DM patients (&lt; 140/90 mmHg), the difference between these groups was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) in favour of the non-diabetic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study has shown the prevalence of arterial hypertension to be twice as high in DM patients aged 25-64 compared to the age-matched non-DM subjects in the Czech Republic. The adequate blood pressure control rate is significantly lower in DM patients than in the non-diabetic population. The study results indicate that the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (&lt; 130/80 mmHg) are not always reached in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"247-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解捷克25-64岁糖尿病(DM)患者动脉高血压的患病率、知晓率和控制率,并与年龄匹配的非糖尿病患者进行比较。材料与方法:对2014年EHES研究中获得的1170名调查对象(男性467人,女性703人)血压测量数据进行分析。95名(8.2%)受访者(44名男性和51名女性)被诊断为糖尿病。结果:糖尿病患者平均收缩压为130.7±18.3 mmHg,非糖尿病患者为123.2±16.8 mmHg (p <0.001)。两组舒张压差异处于有统计学意义的边缘(糖尿病组82.2±9.4 mmHg vs非糖尿病组80.0±10.6 mmHg, p = 0.051)。在研究人群中,69.5%的糖尿病患者和34.2%的非糖尿病患者患有动脉高血压(p <0.001)。糖尿病组高血压知晓率为87.9%,非糖尿病组为66.8%。(p = 0.001)。糖尿病组动脉高血压治疗百分比为94.8%,非糖尿病组为80.5% (p = 0.010)。血压目标:糖尿病患者达到140/90 mmHg的比例为47.3%,非糖尿病患者为60.6% (p = 0.077)。使用血压目标为<130/80 mmHg,只有29.1%的糖尿病患者达到了适当的动脉高血压控制。当比较糖尿病患者推荐血压指标的实现情况(<130/80 mmHg)和非糖尿病患者(<140/90 mmHg),两组间差异有统计学意义(p <0.001),有利于非糖尿病组。结论:该研究表明,捷克共和国25-64岁糖尿病患者的动脉高血压患病率是年龄匹配的非糖尿病患者的两倍。糖尿病患者的适当血压控制率明显低于非糖尿病人群。研究结果提示,糖尿病患者推荐的血压指标(<130/80 mmHg)在临床实践中并不总是达到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and management of arterial hypertension in the population aged 25-64 in the Czech Republic with a focus on diabetic patients.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of arterial hypertension and its awareness rate and control rate among diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in the Czech Republic between 25-64 years of age and to compare the results with those in age-matched non-diabetic patients.

Materials and methods: Blood pressure measurement data of 1 170 respondents (467 men and 703 women) obtained during the EHES study in 2014 were analysed. DM was diagnosed in 95 (8.2%) respondents (44 men and 51 women).

Results: Mean systolic blood pressure in DM patients was 130.7 ± 18.3 vs. 123.2 ± 16.8 mmHg in non-DM subjects (p < 0.001). The difference in diastolic blood pressure was on the borderline of statistical significance (82.2 ± 9.4 mmHg in DM vs. 80.0 ± 10.6 mmHg in non-DM subjects, p = 0.051). Among the study population, 69.5% of DM and 34.2% of non-DM subjects suffered from arterial hypertension (p < 0.001). The hypertension awareness rates were 87.9% in the DM group and 66.8 % in the non-DM group. (p = 0.001). The percentage of treated arterial hypertension was 94.8% in DM patients vs. 80.5% in the non-DM group (p = 0.010). The blood pressure target of < 140/90 mmHg was achieved in 47.3% of DM patients vs. 60.6% in non-DM subjects (p = 0.077). Using a blood pressure target of < 130/80 mmHg, adequate arterial hypertension control was achieved in only 29.1% of DM patients. When comparing the achievement of the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (< 130/80 mmHg) and non-DM patients (< 140/90 mmHg), the difference between these groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) in favour of the non-diabetic group.

Conclusion: The study has shown the prevalence of arterial hypertension to be twice as high in DM patients aged 25-64 compared to the age-matched non-DM subjects in the Czech Republic. The adequate blood pressure control rate is significantly lower in DM patients than in the non-diabetic population. The study results indicate that the blood pressure targets recommended for diabetic patients (< 130/80 mmHg) are not always reached in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie
Epidemiologie Mikrobiologie Imunologie Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers, information from practice, reviews on epidemiological and microbiological subjects. Sufficient space is devoted to diagnostic methods from medical microbiology, parasitology, immunology, and to general aspects and discussions pertaining to preventive medicine. It also brings translations and book reviews useful for medical doctors and research workers and professionals in public health.
期刊最新文献
Posibilities for use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for the analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Human papillomavirus infection (HPV) and pregnancy. Issues of risky behaviours in university students. Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Infection of respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) in the Czech Republic - analysis of hospitalizations and deaths in 2017-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1