结合药物包衣球囊特性的新型西罗莫司洗脱支架在以年龄<35岁的真实患者中的安全性和有效性研究

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2021-10-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1279
Santosh Kumar Sinha, Umeshwar Pandey, Mahmodullah Razi, Awadesh Kumar Sharma, Puneet Aggarwal, Mohit Sachan, Praveen Shukla, Ramesh Thakur
{"title":"结合药物包衣球囊特性的新型西罗莫司洗脱支架在以年龄<35岁的真实患者中的安全性和有效性研究","authors":"Santosh Kumar Sinha,&nbsp;Umeshwar Pandey,&nbsp;Mahmodullah Razi,&nbsp;Awadesh Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Puneet Aggarwal,&nbsp;Mohit Sachan,&nbsp;Praveen Shukla,&nbsp;Ramesh Thakur","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim of study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of abluminal Mitigator DES + Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Envision Scientific, Surat, India) incorporating novel technology of fusion coating of bioresorbable polymer on both abluminal surface of stent and exposed parts of balloon among real world patients specially focusing younger patients (<35 years).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>1293 patients received Mitigator DES + at LPS Institute of Cardiology, Kanpur, India. Primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF)- composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) and secondary end points including peri-procedural device failure (failure of stent delivery, change of stent, stent fracture), target vessel failure (TVF), and patient oriented composite end point (POCE)-composite of all deaths, MI, and revascularization and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Younger population comprised of 374 (29%) patients. Various indications of interventions were STEMI (n = 614; 47.4%), NSTEMI (n = 416; 32.2%), UA (n = 161; 12.5%), and CCS (n = 102; 7.9%). TLF at 1 year in young and overall population were 3.4% and 3.5% respectively which was driven by TVMI and TLR in 1.3% and 1.1% patients respectively. POCE was observed in 9.5% in each group mainly contributed by any revascularization (3.9%). Device failure was significantly lower in young group than overall population (1.3% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.04) which was mainly driven by stent delivery (1.1%) and edge dissection (0.5%). Definite and probable ST was 1.3% and 1.7% respectively which was not significant. Young patients showed insignificantly lower TLF, TVF, ST and POCE and significantly lower device failure (1.3% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.04) when compared to patients >35 years. On multivariate regression analysis, complex lesion, in-stent restenosis, failure of stent delivery and edge dissection were independent predictors of events or device success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mitigator DES+™ is safe among real world patients, including young population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"33 4","pages":"321-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/b8/sha-33-4-321.PMC8754438.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of Safety and Efficacy of Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Incorporating Properties of Drug Coating Balloon Among Real World Patients Focusing Younger Population (<35 years).\",\"authors\":\"Santosh Kumar Sinha,&nbsp;Umeshwar Pandey,&nbsp;Mahmodullah Razi,&nbsp;Awadesh Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Puneet Aggarwal,&nbsp;Mohit Sachan,&nbsp;Praveen Shukla,&nbsp;Ramesh Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.37616/2212-5043.1279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim of study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of abluminal Mitigator DES + Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Envision Scientific, Surat, India) incorporating novel technology of fusion coating of bioresorbable polymer on both abluminal surface of stent and exposed parts of balloon among real world patients specially focusing younger patients (<35 years).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>1293 patients received Mitigator DES + at LPS Institute of Cardiology, Kanpur, India. Primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF)- composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) and secondary end points including peri-procedural device failure (failure of stent delivery, change of stent, stent fracture), target vessel failure (TVF), and patient oriented composite end point (POCE)-composite of all deaths, MI, and revascularization and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Younger population comprised of 374 (29%) patients. Various indications of interventions were STEMI (n = 614; 47.4%), NSTEMI (n = 416; 32.2%), UA (n = 161; 12.5%), and CCS (n = 102; 7.9%). TLF at 1 year in young and overall population were 3.4% and 3.5% respectively which was driven by TVMI and TLR in 1.3% and 1.1% patients respectively. POCE was observed in 9.5% in each group mainly contributed by any revascularization (3.9%). Device failure was significantly lower in young group than overall population (1.3% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.04) which was mainly driven by stent delivery (1.1%) and edge dissection (0.5%). Definite and probable ST was 1.3% and 1.7% respectively which was not significant. Young patients showed insignificantly lower TLF, TVF, ST and POCE and significantly lower device failure (1.3% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.04) when compared to patients >35 years. On multivariate regression analysis, complex lesion, in-stent restenosis, failure of stent delivery and edge dissection were independent predictors of events or device success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mitigator DES+™ is safe among real world patients, including young population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"321-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/b8/sha-33-4-321.PMC8754438.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:研究采用新型生物可吸收聚合物在支架和球囊暴露部位的腔面融合涂层技术的消化道Mitigator DES +西罗莫司洗脱支架(Envision Scientific, Surat, India)在现实患者中的安全性和有效性,特别是针对年轻患者(方法:1293例在印度坎普尔LPS心脏病研究所接受Mitigator DES +的患者)。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF)——心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TVMI)和靶病变血运重建术(TLR)的复合终点;次要终点包括术中器械失败(支架输送失败、支架更换、支架断裂)、靶血管衰竭(TVF),以及患者导向的复合终点(POCE)——1年随访时所有死亡、心肌梗死、血管重建术和支架血栓形成(ST)的复合终点。结果:年轻人群374例(29%)。各种干预指征包括STEMI (n = 614;47.4%), NSTEMI (n = 416;32.2%), UA (n = 161;12.5%), CCS (n = 102;7.9%)。年轻人和总体人群1年TLF分别为3.4%和3.5%,其中TVMI和TLR分别为1.3%和1.1%。POCE发生率为9.5%,主要由血运重建术引起(3.9%)。年轻组的器械失败率明显低于整体人群(1.3% vs. 2.2%;P = 0.04),主要由支架放置(1.1%)和边缘剥离(0.5%)驱动。确定ST和可能ST分别为1.3%和1.7%,差异不显著。年轻患者的TLF、TVF、ST和POCE均无显著降低,设备失效显著降低(1.3% vs. 2.6%;P = 0.04),与>35岁的患者相比。在多元回归分析中,复杂病变、支架内再狭窄、支架输送失败和边缘剥离是事件或装置成功率的独立预测因素。结论:缓解剂DES+™在现实世界患者中是安全的,包括年轻人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of Safety and Efficacy of Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Incorporating Properties of Drug Coating Balloon Among Real World Patients Focusing Younger Population (<35 years).

Objective: Aim of study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of abluminal Mitigator DES + Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Envision Scientific, Surat, India) incorporating novel technology of fusion coating of bioresorbable polymer on both abluminal surface of stent and exposed parts of balloon among real world patients specially focusing younger patients (<35 years).

Method: 1293 patients received Mitigator DES + at LPS Institute of Cardiology, Kanpur, India. Primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF)- composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) and secondary end points including peri-procedural device failure (failure of stent delivery, change of stent, stent fracture), target vessel failure (TVF), and patient oriented composite end point (POCE)-composite of all deaths, MI, and revascularization and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1-year follow-up.

Result: Younger population comprised of 374 (29%) patients. Various indications of interventions were STEMI (n = 614; 47.4%), NSTEMI (n = 416; 32.2%), UA (n = 161; 12.5%), and CCS (n = 102; 7.9%). TLF at 1 year in young and overall population were 3.4% and 3.5% respectively which was driven by TVMI and TLR in 1.3% and 1.1% patients respectively. POCE was observed in 9.5% in each group mainly contributed by any revascularization (3.9%). Device failure was significantly lower in young group than overall population (1.3% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.04) which was mainly driven by stent delivery (1.1%) and edge dissection (0.5%). Definite and probable ST was 1.3% and 1.7% respectively which was not significant. Young patients showed insignificantly lower TLF, TVF, ST and POCE and significantly lower device failure (1.3% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.04) when compared to patients >35 years. On multivariate regression analysis, complex lesion, in-stent restenosis, failure of stent delivery and edge dissection were independent predictors of events or device success rate.

Conclusion: Mitigator DES+™ is safe among real world patients, including young population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Versus Mitral-valve Surgery in Elderly Patients With Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mitral Valve Prolapse with Syncope: Don't Judge the Book by its Cover! Comparison of Sternotomy Access Versus Thoracotomy Access in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Coarctation: A Propensity Score-matched Study. A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease. Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrollment and Secondary Prevention Adherence in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1