脑电图信号的分类揭示10hz经颅交流电刺激运动皮层的局灶后效。

Cerebral cortex communications Pub Date : 2022-01-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/texcom/tgab067
Elinor Tzvi, Jalal Alizadeh, Christine Schubert, Joseph Classen
{"title":"脑电图信号的分类揭示10hz经颅交流电刺激运动皮层的局灶后效。","authors":"Elinor Tzvi,&nbsp;Jalal Alizadeh,&nbsp;Christine Schubert,&nbsp;Joseph Classen","doi":"10.1093/texcom/tgab067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates oscillations in a frequency- and location-specific manner and affects cognitive and motor functions. This effect appears during stimulation as well as \"offline,\" following stimulation, presumably reflecting neuroplasticity. Whether tACS produces long-lasting aftereffects that are physiologically meaningful, is still of current debate. Thus, for tACS to serve as a reliable method for modulating activity within neural networks, it is important to first establish whether \"offline\" aftereffects are robust and reliable. In this study, we employed a novel machine-learning approach to detect signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz tACS to two critical nodes of the motor network: left motor cortex (lMC) and right cerebellum (rCB). To this end, we trained a classifier to distinguish between signals following lMC-tACS, rCB-tACS, and sham. Our results demonstrate better classification of electroencephalography (EEG) signals in both theta (θ, 4-8 Hz) and alpha (α, 8-13 Hz) frequency bands to lMC-tACS compared with rCB-tACS/sham, at lMC-tACS stimulation location. Source reconstruction allocated these effects to premotor cortex. Stronger correlation between classification accuracies in θ and α in lMC-tACS suggested an association between θ and α efffects. Together these results suggest that EEG signals over premotor cortex contains unique signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz motor cortex tACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72551,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex communications","volume":" ","pages":"tgab067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790173/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of EEG Signals Reveals a Focal Aftereffect of 10 Hz Motor Cortex Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.\",\"authors\":\"Elinor Tzvi,&nbsp;Jalal Alizadeh,&nbsp;Christine Schubert,&nbsp;Joseph Classen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/texcom/tgab067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates oscillations in a frequency- and location-specific manner and affects cognitive and motor functions. This effect appears during stimulation as well as \\\"offline,\\\" following stimulation, presumably reflecting neuroplasticity. Whether tACS produces long-lasting aftereffects that are physiologically meaningful, is still of current debate. Thus, for tACS to serve as a reliable method for modulating activity within neural networks, it is important to first establish whether \\\"offline\\\" aftereffects are robust and reliable. In this study, we employed a novel machine-learning approach to detect signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz tACS to two critical nodes of the motor network: left motor cortex (lMC) and right cerebellum (rCB). To this end, we trained a classifier to distinguish between signals following lMC-tACS, rCB-tACS, and sham. Our results demonstrate better classification of electroencephalography (EEG) signals in both theta (θ, 4-8 Hz) and alpha (α, 8-13 Hz) frequency bands to lMC-tACS compared with rCB-tACS/sham, at lMC-tACS stimulation location. Source reconstruction allocated these effects to premotor cortex. Stronger correlation between classification accuracies in θ and α in lMC-tACS suggested an association between θ and α efffects. Together these results suggest that EEG signals over premotor cortex contains unique signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz motor cortex tACS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral cortex communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"tgab067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral cortex communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

经颅交流电刺激(tACS)以频率和位置特异性的方式调节振荡,并影响认知和运动功能。这种效应出现在刺激过程中,以及刺激后的“离线”,可能反映了神经的可塑性。tACS是否会产生长期的、有生理意义的后遗症,目前仍存在争议。因此,要使tACS作为调节神经网络活动的可靠方法,首先要确定“离线”后效是否鲁棒和可靠。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种新的机器学习方法来检测运动网络的两个关键节点:左运动皮层(lMC)和右小脑(rCB)的10赫兹tACS后神经可塑性的特征。为此,我们训练了一个分类器来区分lMC-tACS、rCB-tACS和sham之后的信号。结果表明,在lMC-tACS刺激位置,与rCB-tACS/sham相比,theta (θ, 4-8 Hz)和alpha (α, 8-13 Hz)频段的脑电图(EEG)信号对lMC-tACS的分类更好。源重构将这些效应分配到运动前皮层。在lMC-tACS中,θ和α的分类准确率之间存在较强的相关性,表明θ和α效应之间存在关联。综上所述,这些结果表明运动前皮层的脑电图信号包含了10hz运动皮层tACS后神经可塑性的独特特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classification of EEG Signals Reveals a Focal Aftereffect of 10 Hz Motor Cortex Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates oscillations in a frequency- and location-specific manner and affects cognitive and motor functions. This effect appears during stimulation as well as "offline," following stimulation, presumably reflecting neuroplasticity. Whether tACS produces long-lasting aftereffects that are physiologically meaningful, is still of current debate. Thus, for tACS to serve as a reliable method for modulating activity within neural networks, it is important to first establish whether "offline" aftereffects are robust and reliable. In this study, we employed a novel machine-learning approach to detect signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz tACS to two critical nodes of the motor network: left motor cortex (lMC) and right cerebellum (rCB). To this end, we trained a classifier to distinguish between signals following lMC-tACS, rCB-tACS, and sham. Our results demonstrate better classification of electroencephalography (EEG) signals in both theta (θ, 4-8 Hz) and alpha (α, 8-13 Hz) frequency bands to lMC-tACS compared with rCB-tACS/sham, at lMC-tACS stimulation location. Source reconstruction allocated these effects to premotor cortex. Stronger correlation between classification accuracies in θ and α in lMC-tACS suggested an association between θ and α efffects. Together these results suggest that EEG signals over premotor cortex contains unique signatures of neuroplasticity following 10-Hz motor cortex tACS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the coupling and decoupling of mind wandering and perception: a shared metabolism account. Striatal correlates of Bayesian beliefs in self-efficacy in adolescents and their relation to mood and autonomy: a pilot study Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans Detection and characterization of resting state functional networks in squirrel monkey brain. Methamphetamine enhances neural activation during anticipation of loss in the monetary incentive delay task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1