评估德国肿瘤动力学数据集的代表性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5414/CP204144
Svetlana Alymova, Karel Kostev, Vicky Casey, Nina Schmidt, Matthias Kalder, Christoph Roderburg, Nicole Friedersdorf
{"title":"评估德国肿瘤动力学数据集的代表性。","authors":"Svetlana Alymova,&nbsp;Karel Kostev,&nbsp;Vicky Casey,&nbsp;Nina Schmidt,&nbsp;Matthias Kalder,&nbsp;Christoph Roderburg,&nbsp;Nicole Friedersdorf","doi":"10.5414/CP204144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics (OD) dataset by comparing its projected patient population structure with that outlined in published epidemiological literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The OD is an international cross-sectional semi-retrospective survey collecting anonymized patient cases from a representative panel of physicians via a web-based questionnaire; the cases are quality-checked and projected to the drug-treated prevalence using physician workload information. The present study verifies the OD 2018 projected patient proportions by indication and sex against prevalence figures in IARC's Globocan and the Cancer in Germany report by the Robert Koch Institute. Additionally, age group and metastasis presence distributions in gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-treated prostate cancer patients are compared with the findings of a registry-based study: Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes by Hupe et al. [3].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OD demonstrated a cancer type distribution similar to the comparator sources. Cancer-specific sex distribution differences could be attributed to real-world diagnosis and treatment patterns. The age group distributions of GnRH-treated prostate cancer patients did not differ significantly between the OD and the Hupe et al. [3] study according to confidence interval comparisons and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Projected patient distributions for the OD Germany were similar to those documented in the published literature. The dissimilarities can be attributed to the low drug-treated prevalence of some cancer types and sex-specific diagnosis timeline differences. Further investigations are needed to verify the reliability of histological biomarker data as well as patient demographics in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"60 5","pages":"207-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics dataset.\",\"authors\":\"Svetlana Alymova,&nbsp;Karel Kostev,&nbsp;Vicky Casey,&nbsp;Nina Schmidt,&nbsp;Matthias Kalder,&nbsp;Christoph Roderburg,&nbsp;Nicole Friedersdorf\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics (OD) dataset by comparing its projected patient population structure with that outlined in published epidemiological literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The OD is an international cross-sectional semi-retrospective survey collecting anonymized patient cases from a representative panel of physicians via a web-based questionnaire; the cases are quality-checked and projected to the drug-treated prevalence using physician workload information. The present study verifies the OD 2018 projected patient proportions by indication and sex against prevalence figures in IARC's Globocan and the Cancer in Germany report by the Robert Koch Institute. Additionally, age group and metastasis presence distributions in gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-treated prostate cancer patients are compared with the findings of a registry-based study: Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes by Hupe et al. [3].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OD demonstrated a cancer type distribution similar to the comparator sources. Cancer-specific sex distribution differences could be attributed to real-world diagnosis and treatment patterns. The age group distributions of GnRH-treated prostate cancer patients did not differ significantly between the OD and the Hupe et al. [3] study according to confidence interval comparisons and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Projected patient distributions for the OD Germany were similar to those documented in the published literature. The dissimilarities can be attributed to the low drug-treated prevalence of some cancer types and sex-specific diagnosis timeline differences. Further investigations are needed to verify the reliability of histological biomarker data as well as patient demographics in other countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"207-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:通过比较德国肿瘤动力学(OD)数据集的预测患者群体结构与已发表的流行病学文献中概述的数据集的代表性来评估其代表性。材料和方法:OD是一项国际横断面半回顾性调查,通过网络问卷从具有代表性的医生小组收集匿名患者病例;这些病例经过质量检查,并利用医生工作量信息预测药物治疗的患病率。本研究验证了2018年根据适应症和性别预测的OD患者比例,以及IARC的Globocan和罗伯特·科赫研究所(Robert Koch Institute)的德国癌症报告中的患病率数据。此外,将促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRHa)治疗的前列腺癌患者的年龄组和转移存在分布与一项基于登记的研究结果进行比较:使用德国Claims数据库对启动GnRH激动剂/拮抗剂治疗的前列腺癌患者的回顾性分析:流行病学和患者结局Hupe等[3]。结果:OD表现出与比较源相似的癌症类型分布。癌症特异性的性别分布差异可归因于现实世界的诊断和治疗模式。通过置信区间比较和Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验,OD与Hupe等[3]研究中gnrh治疗前列腺癌患者的年龄组分布无显著差异。结论:预测的德国OD患者分布与已发表文献中记录的相似。这种差异可归因于某些癌症类型的低药物治疗患病率和性别特异性诊断时间的差异。需要进一步的调查来验证其他国家的组织学生物标志物数据以及患者人口统计数据的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics dataset.

Objectives: To evaluate the representativeness of the German Oncology Dynamics (OD) dataset by comparing its projected patient population structure with that outlined in published epidemiological literature.

Materials and methods: The OD is an international cross-sectional semi-retrospective survey collecting anonymized patient cases from a representative panel of physicians via a web-based questionnaire; the cases are quality-checked and projected to the drug-treated prevalence using physician workload information. The present study verifies the OD 2018 projected patient proportions by indication and sex against prevalence figures in IARC's Globocan and the Cancer in Germany report by the Robert Koch Institute. Additionally, age group and metastasis presence distributions in gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-treated prostate cancer patients are compared with the findings of a registry-based study: Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes by Hupe et al. [3].

Results: The OD demonstrated a cancer type distribution similar to the comparator sources. Cancer-specific sex distribution differences could be attributed to real-world diagnosis and treatment patterns. The age group distributions of GnRH-treated prostate cancer patients did not differ significantly between the OD and the Hupe et al. [3] study according to confidence interval comparisons and a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

Conclusion: Projected patient distributions for the OD Germany were similar to those documented in the published literature. The dissimilarities can be attributed to the low drug-treated prevalence of some cancer types and sex-specific diagnosis timeline differences. Further investigations are needed to verify the reliability of histological biomarker data as well as patient demographics in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Identification of factors associated with vancomycin-induced acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis using the Common Data Model. Retrospective evaluation of medical information for predicting tazobactam/piperacillin-induced liver injury. A disproportionality analysis of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Positive effects of magnesium supplementation in metabolic syndrome. Corrigendum for the article Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 11: 525-533.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1